Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses

Hearing Research

Volumn 228, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 44-57

  Guiraud, Jeanne ^a,b,c   Gallego, Stéphane ^b,c   Arnold, Laure ^d   Boyle, Patrick ^d   Truy, Eric ^a,b,c   Collet, Lionel ^a,b,c  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Advanced Bionics UK Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Deafness characteristics; ELAR latencies; Tonotopy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN STEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COCHLEAR NERVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE DURATION; ELECTRODE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; NERVE CONDUCTION; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34247538035     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Abbas P.J. Electrophysiology. Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations (1993), Singular Publishing Group, San Diego
2. Abbas P.J., and Brown C.J. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with current level. Hear. Res. 51 1 (1991) 123-137
3. Advanced Bionics Corporation, 2000. SCLIN2000: Audiologists Fitting Manual.
4. Allum J.H., Shallop J.K., Hotz M., and Pfaltz C.R. Characteristics of electrically evoked 'auditory' brainstem responses elicited with the nucleus 22-electrode intracochlear implant. Scand. Audiol. 19 4 (1990) 263-267
5. Barnet A.B. Auditory evoked potentials during sleep in normal children from ten days to three years of age. Electroen. Clin. Neurophysiol. 39 1 (1975) 29-41
6. Blamey P. Are spiral ganglion cell numbers important for speech perception with a cochlear implant?. Am. J. Otol. 18 Suppl. 6 (1997) S11-S12
7. Blamey P., Arndt P., Bergeron F., Bredberg G., Brimacombe J., Facer G., Larky J., Lindstrom B., Nedzelski J., Peterson A., Shipp D., Staller S., and Whitford L. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol. Neurootol. 1 5 (1996) 293-306
8. Brimacombe J.A., and Eisenberg L.S. Tone decay in subjects with the single channel cochlear implant. Audiology 23 (1984) 321-332
9. Bruneau N., Roux S., Guerin P., Barthelemy C., and Lelord G. Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4-8-year-old children. Psychophysiology 34 1 (1997) 32-38
10. Ceponiené R., Cheour M., and Näätänen R. Interstimulus interval and auditory event-related potentials in children: evidence for multiple generators. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 108 (1998) 345-354
11. Chouard C.H., Josset P., Meyer B., and Buche J.F. Effect of chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve on development of cochlear nuclei in guinea-pig. Ann. Otol. Laryngol. (Paris) 100 (1983) 417-422
12. Clark G.M. Nucleus multichannel implant. Adv. Otorhinolaryngol. 38 (1987) 1-189
13. Courchesne E. Neurophysiological correlates of cognitive development: Changes in long latency event-related potentials from childhood to adulthood. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45 (1978) 468-482
14. Courchesne E. Chronology of postnatal human brain development: event-related potentials, positron emission tomography, myelogenesis, and synaptogenesis studies. In: Rohrbaugh J.W., Parasuraman R., and Johnson Jr. R. (Eds). Event-Related Brain Potentials: Basic Issues and Applications (1990), Oxford University Press, New York 210-241
15. Cowan W.M. Anterograde and retrograde transneuronal degeneration in the central and peripheral nervous system. In: Nauta W.J.H., and Ebbesson S.O.E. (Eds). Contemporary Research Methods in Neuroanatomy (1970), Springer Verlag, New York 217-251
16. Cunningham J., Nicol T., Zecker S., and Kraus N. Speech-evoked neurophysiologic responses in children with problems in learning: Development and behavioral correlates of perception. Ear Hearing 21 (2000) 554-568
17. Eggermont J.J. On the rate of maturation of sensory evoked potentials. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol. 70 (1988) 293-305
18. Eggermont J.J., Ponton C.W., Don M., Waring M.D., and Kwong B. Maturational delays in cortical evoked potentials in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol. 117 (1997) 161-163
19. Fayad J., Linthicum Jr. F.H., Otto S.R., Galey F.R., and House W.F. Cochlear implants: histopathologic findings related to performance in 16 human temporal bones. Ann. Otol., Rhinol. Laryngol. 100 (1991) 807-811
20. Finney E.M., Fine I., and Dobkins K.R. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nature Neurosci. 4 (2001) 1171-1173
21. Firszt J.B., Chambers R.D., Kraus N., and Reeder R.M. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response. Ear Hear. 23 6 (2002) 502-515
22. Firszt J.B., Chambers And R.D., and Kraus N. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures. Ear Hear. 23 6 (2002) 516-531
23. Globus A. Brain morphology as a function of presynaptic morphology and activity. In: Riesen (Ed). The Developmental Neuropsychology of Sensory Deprivation (1975), Academic, New York
24. Gorga M.P., Kaminski J.R., Beauchaine K.A., and Jesteadt W. Auditory brainstem responses to tone bursts in normally hearing subjects. J. Speech Hear. Res. 31 1 (1988) 87-97
25. Groenen P.A.P., Makhdoum M., Van den Brink J., Stollman M., Snik A.F.M., and Van den Broek P. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh) 116 (1996) 785-790
26. Groenen P.A.P., Snik A.F.M., and Van den Broek P. Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus perception abilities in cochlear implant users. Audiology 36 (1997) 83-97
27. Guiraud J., Gallego S., Arnold L., Boyle P., Truy E., and Collet L. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. Hear. Res. 223 1-2 (2007) 48-60
28. Hackett T.A., Preuss T.M., and Kaas J.H. Architectonic identification of the core region in auditory cortex of macaques, chimpanzees, and humans. J. Comp. Neurol. 441 3 (2001) 197-222
29. Hall R.D. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear. Res. 49 1-3 (1990) 155-168
30. Hardie N., and Shepherd R. Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem. Hear. Res. 128 (1999) 147-165
31. Hinojosa R., Seligsohn R., and Lerner S.A. Ganglion cell counts in the cochleae of patients with normal audiograms. Acta Otolaryngol. 99 1-2 (1985) 8-13
32. Huttenlocher P.R. Synaptic density in human frontal cortex - developmental changes and effects of aging. Brain Res. 163 (1979) 195-205
33. Jacobson G., Lombardi D., Gibbens N., Ahmad B., and Newman C. The effects of stimulus frequency and recording site on the amplitude and latency of multichannel cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) component N1. Ear Hear. 13 (1992) 300-306
34. Johnsson L.-G. Sequence of degeneration of Corti's Organ and its first-order neurones. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 83 (1974) 294-303
35. Jyung R.W., Miller J.M., and Cannon S.C. Evaluation of eighth nerve integrity by the electrically evoked middle latency response. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 101 (1989) 670-682
36. Kawano A., Seldon H.L., Clark G.M., Ramsden R.T., and Raine C.H. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol. 118 3 (1998) 313-326
37. Kelly A.S., Purdy S.C., and Thorne P.R. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116 6 (2005) 1235-1246
38. Kiang N.Y., and Moxon E.C. Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Annal Otol, Rhinol, Laryngol 81 (1972) 714-730
39. Kileny P.R., Boerst A., and Zwolan T. Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 117 (1997) 161-169
40. Kohenen A. Effect of some ototoxic drugs upon the pattern and innervation of cochlear sensory cells in the guinea pig. Acta Otololaryngol. 208 Suppl. (1965) 1-66
41. Kral A., Hartmann R., Tillein J., Heid S., and Klinke R. Congenital auditory deprivation reduces synaptic activity within the auditory cortex in a layer-specific manner. Cereb. Cortex 10 (2000) 714-726
42. Kraus N., and McGee T. Electrophysiology of the human auditory system. In: Popper A.N., and Fay R.R. (Eds). The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neurophysiology (1992), Springer-Verlag, New York
43. Kraus N., Smith D.I., Reed N.L., Stein L.K., and Cartee C. Auditory middle latency responses in children: effects of age and diagnostic category. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 62 (1985) 343-351
44. Kraus N., McGee T., Ferre J., Hoeppner J., Carrell T., Sharma A., and Nicol T. Mismatch negativity in the neurophysiologic/behavioral evaluation of auditory processing deficits: a case study. Ear Hear. 14 (1993) 223-234
45. Kraus N., Micco A.G., Koch D.B., McGee T., Carrell T., Sharma A., Wiet R.J., and Weingarten C.Z. The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear-implant users. Hear. Res. 65 (1993) 118-124
46. Kraus N., McGee T.J., and Koch D.B. Speech sound representation, perception, and plasticity: a neurophysiologic perspective. Audiol Neuro-Otol. 3 (1998) 168-182
47. Kurtzberg D., Vaughan H., Kreuzer J., and Fliegler K. Developmental studies and clinical applications of mismatch negativity: problems and prospects. Ear Hear. 16 (1995) 105-117
48. Kwon B.J., and van den Honert C. Effect of electrode configuration on psychophysical forward masking in cochlear implant listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (2006) 2994-3002
49. Lafon, J.C., 1964. Le test phonétique et la mesure de l'audition. In: Eindhoven (Eds.), Centrex.
50. Leake P.A., and Hradek G.T. Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats. Hear. Res. 33 1 (1988) 11-33
51. Leake P., Snyder R., Hradek G., and Rebscher S. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear. Res. 64 (1992) 99-117
52. Lee D.S., Lee J.S., Oh S.H., Kim S.K., Kim J.W., Chung J.K., Lee M.C., and Kim C.S. Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants. Nature 409 (2001) 149-150
53. Loeb G.E., White M.W., and Jenkins W.M. Biophysical considerations in the electrical stimulation of the auditory system. Annal. NY Acad. Sci. 405 (1983) 123-136
54. Lusted H.S., Shelton C., and Simmons F.B. Comparison of electrode sites in electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Laryngoscope 94 7 (1984) 878-882
55. Makhdoum M.J., Groenen P.A., Snik A.F., and van den Broek P. Intra- and interindividual correlations between auditory evoked potentials and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Scand. Audiol. 27 1 (1998) 13-20
56. Martin L., Barajas J.J., Fernandez R., and Torres E. Auditory event-related potentials in well-characterized groups of children. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71 (1988) 375-381
57. Maurer D., Lewis T.L., Brent H.P., and Levin A.V. Rapid improvement in the acuity of infants after visual input. Science 286 (1999) 108-110
58. Maurer J., Collet L., Pelster H., Truy E., and Gallego S. Auditory late cortical response and speech recognition in digisonic cochlear implant users. Laryngoscope. 112 12 (2002) 2220-2224
59. McFeely Jr. W.J., Antonelli P.J., Rodriguez F.J., and Holmes A.E. Somatosensory phenomena after multichannel cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf adults. Am. J. Otol. 19 (1998) 467-471
60. Micco A.G., Kraus N., Koch D.B., McGee T.J., Carrell T.D., Sharma A., Nicol T., and Wiet R.J. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am. J. Otol. 16 (1995) 514-520
61. Miller M.R. In: Webster D.B., Fay R.R., and Popper A.N. (Eds). The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing (1992), Springer, New York 463-487
62. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., and Brown C.J. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response to stimulation of different sites in the cochlea. Hear. Res. 66 2 (1993) 130-142
63. Moore J.K. The human auditory brain stem: a comparative view. Hear. Res. 29 1 (1987) 1-32
64. Moore D.R. Auditory brainstem of the ferret: long survival following cochlear removal progressively changes projections from the cochlear nucleus to the inferior colliculus. J. Comp. Neurol. 339 (1994) 301-310
65. Morgan D.L., and Proske U. On the branching of motoneurons. Muscle Nerve 24 (2001) 372-379
66. Näätanen R., and Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24 (1987) 375-425
67. Nadol Jr. J.B., Young Y.S., and Glynn R.J. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 98 (1989) 411-416
68. Nicolas-Puel C., Durrieu J.P., Lenoir M., Tran Ba Huy T., Uziel A., and Puel J.L. Electrical stimulation activates two different sites within the guinea pig cochlea. Hear. Res. 100 1-2 (1996) 181-191
69. Nishimura H., Hashikawa K., Doi K., Iwaki T., Watanabe Y., Kusuaka H., Nishimura T., and Kubo T. Sign language "heard" in the auditory cortex. Nature 397 (1999) 116
70. Nordeen K.W., Killackey H.P., and Kitzes L.M. Ascending projections to the inferior colliculus following unilateral cochlear ablation in the neonatal gerbil, Meriones unguicultus. Journal of Computational Neurology 214 (1983) 144-153
71. Ohlrich E.S., Barnet A.B., Weiss I.P., and Shanks B.L. Auditory evoked potential development in early childhood: a longitudinal study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 44 (1978) 411-423
72. Otte J., Schunknecht H.F., and Kerr A.G. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 8 8 (1978) 1231-1246
73. Oviatt D.L., and Kileny P.R. Auditory event related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. Am. J. Audiol. 1 (1991) 48-55
74. Paetau R., Ahonen A., Salonen O., and Sams M. Auditory evoked magnetic fields to tones and pseudowords in healthy children and adults. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 12 2 (1995) 177-185
75. Pantev C., Hoke M., Lehnertz K., Lütkenhöner B., Anogianakis G., and Wittkowski W. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69 (1988) 160-170
76. Pauler M., Schuknecht H., and Thornton R. Correlative studies of cochlear neuronal loss with speech discrimination and pure-tone thresholds. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 243 (1986) 200-206
77. Pelizzone M., Kasper A., and Montandon P. Electrically evoked responses in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 28 (1989) 230-238
78. Pfingst B.E. Operating ranges and intensity psychophysics for cochlear implants. Implications for speech processing strategies. Arch. Otolaryngol. 110 (1984) 140-144
79. Pfingst B.E., Spelman F.A., and Sutton D. Operating ranges for cochlear implants. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 89 Suppl. 2 (1980) 1-4
80. Pfingst B.E., Zwolan T.A., and Holloway L.A. Effects of stimulus configuration on psychophysical operating levels and on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Hear Res. 112 1-2 (1997) 247-260
81. Picton T.W., Hillyard S.A., Krausz H.I., and Galambos R. Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 36 (1974) 179-190
82. Picton T.W., Woods D.L., Baribeau-Braun J., and Healey T.M. Evoked potential audiometry. J. Otolaryngol. 6 2 (1976) 90-119
83. Ponton C.W., and Don M. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 16 (1995) 131-146
84. Ponton C.W., and Eggermont J.J. Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use. Audiol. Neurotol. 6 (2001) 363-380
85. Ponton C.W., Don M., Eggermont J.J., Waring M.D., Kwong B., and Masuda A. Auditory system plasticity in children after long periods of complete deafness. Neuroreport 8 (1996) 61-65
86. Ponton C.W., Don M., Eggermont J.J., Waring M.D., and Masuda A. Maturation of human cortical auditory function: Differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 17 (1996) 430-437
87. Ponton C.W., Moore J.K., and Eggermont J.J. Prolonged deafness limits auditory system developmental plasticity: evidence from an evoked potentials study in children with cochlear implants. Scand. Audiol. 28 (1999) 13-22
88. Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B., and Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111 (2000) 220-236
89. Purves D., and Lichtman J.W. Principles of Neural Development (1985), Sinauer Sunderland, MA, USA
90. Rapin I., Schimmel H., Tourk L.M., Krasnegor N.A., and Pollak C. Evoked responses to clicks and tones of varying intensity in waking adults. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 21 (1966) 335-344
91. Rattay F. Ways to approximate current-distance relations for electrically stimulated fibers. J. Theor. Biol. 125 3 (1987) 339-349
92. Redies H., Sieben U., and Creutzfeldt O.D. Functional subdivisions in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig. J. Comp. Neurol. 282 4 (1989) 473-488
93. Roberts T.P., and Poeppel D. Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. Neuroreport 7 6 (1996) 1138-1140
94. Roberts T.P.L., Ferrari P., Stufflebeam S.M., and Poeppel D. Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: Stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 17 2 (2000) 114-129
95. Ryugo D.K., Pongstaporn T., Huchton D., and Niparko J. Ultrastructural analysis of primary endings in deaf white cats: Morphologic alterations in endbulbs of Held. J. Comput. Neurol. 385 (1997) 230-244
96. Ryugo D.K., Rosenbaum B.T., Kim P.J., Niparko J.K., and Saada A.A. Single unit recordings in the auditory nerve of congenitally deaf white cats: morphological correlates in the cochlea and cochlear nucleus. J. Comput. Neurol. 397 (1998) 532-548
97. Scherg M., and von Cramon D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 65 (1986) 344-360
98. Schmidt J.M. Cochlear neuronal populations in developmental defects of the inner ear. Implications for cochlear implantation. Acta. Otolaryngol. 99 1-2 (1985) 14-20
99. Shallop J.K., Beiter A.L., Goin D.W., and Mischke R.E. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ear. Hear. 11 1 (1990) 5-15
100. Shannon R.V. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction. Hear. Res. 12 1 (1983) 1-16
101. Sharma A., Kraus N., McGee T.J., and Nicol T.G. Developmental changes in P1 and N1 central auditory responses elicited by consonant-vowel syllables. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 104 (1997) 540-545
102. Sharma A., Dorman M., Spahr A., and Todd N.W. Early cochlear implantation allows normal development of central auditory pathways. Annal. Otol., Rhinol. Laryngol. 111 (2002) 38-41
103. Sharma A., Martin K., Roland P., Bauer P., Sweeney M.H., Gilley P., and Dorman M. P1 latency as a biomarker for central auditory development in children with hearing impairment. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 16 8 (2005) 564-573
104. Shepherd R.K., Clark G.M., and Black R.C. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in cats. Acta. Otolaryngol. (Stockholm) 399 (1983) 19-31
105. Shibasaki H., and Miyazaki M. Event-related potentials studies in infants and children. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9 3 (1992) 408-418
106. Spoendlin H. Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. Acta. Otolaryngol. 79 (1975) 266-275
107. Spoendlin H., and Schrott A. Analysis of the human auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 43 1 (1989) 25-38
108. Spoendlin H., and Schrott A. Quantitative evaluation of the human cochlear nerve. Acta. Otolaryngol. 470 Suppl. (1990) 61-69
109. Stapells D.R., Picton T.W., Durieux-Smith A., Edwards C.G., and Moran L.M. Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Audiology 29 (1990) 262-274
110. Stufflebeam S.M., Poeppel D., Rowley H.A., and Roberts T.P.L. Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency. Neuroreport 9 (1998) 91-94
111. Stypulkowski P.H., van den Honert C., and Krivstad S.D. Electrophysiologic evaluation of the cochlear implant patient recordings. Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 19 2 (1986) 249-257
112. Sutter M.L., and Schreiner C.E. Physiology and topography of neurons with multipeaked tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 65 5 (1991) 1207-1226
113. Tonnquist-Uhlen I., Borg E., and Spens K.E. Topography of auditory evoked long-latency potentials in normal children, with particular reference to the N1 component. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95 (1995) 34-41
114. Tremblay K., Kraus N., McGee T., Ponton C., and Otis B. Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear Hear. 22 2 (2001) 79-90
115. Vasconcelos B.C., Escoda C., Vasconcellos R.J., and Neves R.F. Conduction velocity of the rabbit facial nerve: a noninvasive functional evaluation. Pesqui. Odontol. Bras. 17 2 (2003) 126-131
116. Vaughan Jr. H.G., and Ritter W. The sources of auditory evoked responses recorded from the human scalp. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 28 (1970) 360-367
117. Verkindt C., Bertrand O., Perrin F., Echallier J.F., and Pernier J. Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex: N100 topography and multiple dipole model analysis. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 96 (1995) 143-156
118. Wable J., van den Abbeele T., Gallego S., and Frachet B. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111 (2000) 743-751
119. Wable J., Frachet B., and Gallego S. Tone decay at threshold with auditory electrical stimulation in digisonic cochlear implantees. Audiology 40 5 (2001) 265-271
120. Walsh S.M., and Leake-Jones P.A. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results. Hear. Res. 7 3 (1982) 281-304
121. Waltzman S.B., Fisher S.G., Niparko J.K., and Cohen N.L. Predictors of postoperative performance with cochlear implants. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 165 Suppl. (1995) 15-18
122. Webster D.B., and Webster M. Neonatal sound deprivation affects brain stem auditory nuclei. Arch. Otolaryngol. 103 (1977) 329-398
123. Webster D.B., and Webster M. Neonatal sound deprivation affects brainstem auditory nuclei. Arch. Otolaryngol. 103 (1979) 392-396
124. Woods D.L., and Alain C. Feature processing during high-rate auditory selective attention. Percept. Psychophys. 53 4 (1993) 391-402
125. Woods D.L., Chimento T.C., Andrews R.J., and Kirby R. Miniature electrode arrays reveal tonotopic auditory evoked potentials in pig cortex. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 15 (1989) 112
126. Woods D.L., Alain C., Covarrubias D., and Zaidel O. Frequency-related differences in the speed of human auditory processing. Hear. Res. 66 (1993) 46-52
127. Wunderlich J.L., and Cone-Wesson B.K. Maturation of CAEP in infants and children: a review. Hear. Res. 212 1-2 (2006) 212-223
128. Ylikoski J., Wersall J., and Bjorkroth B. Degeneration of neural elements in the cochlea of the guinea-pig after damage to the organ of corti by ototoxic antibiotics. Acta. Otolaryngol. 326 Suppl. (1974) 23-41
129. Zhou R., Abbas P.J., and Assouline J.G. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response in peripherally myelin-deficient mice. Hear. Res. 88 1-2 (1995) 98-106