Intra- and interindividual correlations between auditory evoked potentials and speech perception in cochlear implant users

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 13-20

  Makhdoum, Mohammad Jamal ^a   Groenen, Paul A P ^a   Snik, Ad F M ^a   Van Den Broek, Paul ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Cochlear implants; EABR; EALR; EMLR; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CORRELATION FUNCTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031931115     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/010503998419650     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with current level. Hear Res 1991; 51: 123-37.
2. Allum JHJ, Shallop JK, Hotz M, Pfaltz CR. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses elicited with the Nucleus 22-electrode intracochlear implant. Scand Audiol 1990; 19: 263-7.
3. Brix R, Gedlicka W. Late cortical auditory potentials evoked by electrostimulation in deaf and cochlear implant patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1991; 248: 442-4.
4. Brokx JPL, Beijnon AJ, Van Durme M, Timmermans B. Ontwikkeling van nederlandstalige auditieve tests. Logopedie & foniatrie 1987; 6: 186-90 (in Dutch).
5. Brown CJ. Using electrically evoked auditory potentials in the clinical management of cochlear implant candidates and recipients. Semin Hear 1996; 17: 389-401.
6. Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Fryauf-Bertschy H, Kelsay D, Gantz BJ. Intraoperative and postoperative electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses in Nucleus cochlear implant users: implications for the fitting process. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 168-76.
7. Fifer RC, Novak MA. Myogenic influences on the electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABR) in humans. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 1180-4.
8. Gantz BJ, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Intraoperative measures of electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potential. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 137-44.
9. Groenen PAP, Makhdoum MJA, Van den Brink JL, Stollman MHP, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996; 116: 785-90.
10. Hall JW. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon, 1992.
11. Groenen PAP, Snik AFM, Van den Broek P. Electrically evoked auditory middle latency responses versus perception abilities in cochlear implant users. Audiology 1997; 36: 83-97.
12. Kileny PR. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brainstem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) responses. Am J Otol 1991; 12 (Suppl): 37-42.
13. Kileny PR, Kemink JL. Electrically evoked middle-latency auditory potentials in cochlear implant candidates. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987; 113: 1072-7.
14. Mens LHM, Oostendorp T, Van den Broek P. Identifying electrode failures with cochlear implant generated surface potentials. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 330-8.
15. Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DB, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Sharma A, Nicol T, Wiet RJ. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 1995; 16: 514-20.
16. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A. Maturation of human cortical auditory function: differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 430-7.
17. Ponton CW, Don M, Waring MD, Eggermont JJ, Masuda A. Regional dipole source analysis of evoked potentials to acoustic and cochlear implant stimulation. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Wien: Manz, 1994; 3-7.
18. Shallop JK. Objective electrophysiological measures from cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 58-63.
19. Shallop JK, Beiter AL, Goin DW, Mischke RE. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 5-15.
20. Skinner MW, Holden LK, Holden TA, Demorest ME. Comparison of procedures for obtaining thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels with the Nucleus cochlear implant system. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 677-89.
21. Stypulkowski PH, Van den Honert C, Kvistad SD. Electrophysiologic evaluation of the cochlear implant patient. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1986; 19: 249-57.
22. Van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Characterization of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear Res 1986; 21: 109-26.
23. Van Dijk JE, Van Olphen AF, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Van den Broek P, Smoorenburg GF. Predictive factors for success with a cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995, 104 (Suppl 166): 196-8.