The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 116, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 785-790

  Groenen, P A P ^a   Makhdoum, M ^a   Van Den Brink, J L ^a   Stollman, M H P ^b   Snik, A F M ^a   Van Den Broek, P ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Institute St Marie   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ABR; ALR; Auditory evoked potentials; Cochlear implantation; P300; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0029856254     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016489609137926     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hinojosa R, Blough RR, Mhoon EE. Profound sensory neural deafness: a histopathologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1987; Suppl.128: 43-6.
2. Nadol JB, Young Y-S, Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: Implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989; 98: 411-5.
3. Moore JK, Niparko JK, Miller MR, Linthicum FH. Effect of profound hearing loss on a central auditory nucleus. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 588-95.
4. Van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Characterization of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) in cats and humans. Hear Res 1986; 21: 109-26.
5. Hall RD. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1990; 49: 155-68.
6. Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Electrically evoked responses in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1989; 28: 230-8.
7. Shallop JK, Beiter AL, Goin DW, Mischke RE. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses (EABR) and middle latency responses (EMLR) obtained from patients with the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 5-15.
8. Allum JHJ, Shallop JK, Hotz M, Pfaltz CR. Characteristics of electrically evoked 'auditory' brainstem responses elicited with the nucleus 22-electrode intracochlear implant. Scand Audiol 1990; 19: 263-7.
9. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with current level. Hear Res 1991; 51: 123-38.
10. Van den Borne S, Mens LHM, Snik AFM, Spies TH, Van den Broek P. Stapedius reflex and EABR thresholds in experienced users of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994; 114: 141-3.
11. Oviatt DL, Kileny PR. Auditory event-related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. Am J Audiol 1991; 1: 48-55.
12. Brix R, Gedlicka W. Late cortical auditory potentials evoked by electrostimulation in deaf and cochlear implant patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1991; 248: 442-4.
13. Ponton CW, Don M, Waring MD, Eggermont JJ, Masuda A. Regional dipole source analysis of evoked potentials to acoustic and cochlear implant stimulation. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Wien: Manz, 1994: 3-7.
14. Kaga K, Kodera K, Hirota E, Tsuzuku T. P300 response to tones and speech sounds after a cochlear implant: a case report. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 905-7.
15. Micco AG, Kraus N, Koch DB, et al. Speech-evoked cognitive P300 potentials in cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 1995; 4: 514-20.
16. Hall JW. Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Boston: Allyn and Brown, 1992.
17. Hinderink JB, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Van den Broek P. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 1995; 105: 618-22.
18. Cassandro E, Mosca F, Sequino L, De Falco FA, Campanello G. Otoneurological findings in Friedreich's ataxia and other inherited neuropathies. Audiology 1986; 25: 84-91.