Improving the coordination of collaborative learning with process models

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years - Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, CSCL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 18-27

  Carell, Angela ^a   Herrmann, Thomas ^a   Kienle, Andrea ^b   Menold, Natalja ^a  

^a RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^b TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coordination; Graphical process models; Maps; Representational guidance

Indexed keywords

GRAPHIC METHODS; MAPS; STUDENTS;

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COORDINATION; DEVELOPED MODEL; GRAPHICAL MODEL; GRAPHICAL PROCESS MODELS; PROCESS MODEL; REPRESENTATIONAL GUIDANCES; SOCIOTECHNICAL;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 34247227311     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1149293.1149296     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Appelt, W. and Mambrey, P. (1999) Experiences with the BSCW Shared Workspace System as the Backbone of a Virtual Learning Environment for Students. In Collis, B. and R. Oliver (Eds.), Proceedings of EDMEDIA' 99. Charlottesville, VA: AACE, 1999, 1710-1715.
2. Austin, J.N (1955) How to do Things with Words. Oxford.
3. Baker, M. and Lund, K. (1997) Promoting reflective interaction in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193. (Pubitemid 127107956)
4. Dillenbourg, P. (2002) Over-scripting CSCL. The risk of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P.A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three Worlds of CSCL. Can we Support CSCL. Heerlen: Open University Nederland, 64-91.
5. Guzdial, M. and Turns, J. (2000) Effektive Discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Science, 9, 4, 437-469.
6. Herrmann, T. (2003): Learning and Teaching in Socio-Technical Environments. In T.J. Van Weert, and R.K. Munro (Eds.), Informatics and the Digital Society. Social, Ethical and Cognitive Issues. Boston et al.: Kluwer, 59-72.
7. Herrmann, T. and Loser, K.-U. (1999) Vagueness in models of socio-technical systems. Behavior & Information Technology. Special Issue on Analysis of Cooperation and Communication, 18, 5, 313-323. (Pubitemid 129601975)
8. th Participatory Design Conference 2004. New York: ACM, 132-141. (Pubitemid 41562742)
9. Kensing, F., Simonsen, J. and Bødker, Keld (1998) MUST - a method for participatory design. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 167-198.
10. Kienle, A. and Herrmann, T. (2003) Integration of communication, coordination and learning material - a guide for the functionality of collaborative learning environments. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 33.
11. Lipponen, L, Rahikainen, M., Hakkarainen, K. and Palonen, T. (2002) Effective Participation and discourse through a computer network: Investigating elementary students' computer-supported interaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27, 4, 355-384. (Pubitemid 36607704)
12. Ludvigsen, S. and Mørch, A. (2003) Categorisation in knowledge building: Task specific argumentation in a colocated CSCL environment. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen and U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments. Proceedings of the CSCL Norwell, MA: Kluwer. 2003, 67-76 Opentext, http://www.opentext.com/, last visit: 2004-11-09.
13. Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L. (1992) Taking CSCW Seriously. Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 7-40.
14. Stahl, G. and Herrmann, T. (1999) Intertwining Perspectives and Negotiation. In: Proceedings of Group-99 International conference on Supporting Group Work (Phoenix, AZ., November 1999). 316-325.
15. Suchman, L. A. (1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
16. Suthers, D. and Hundhausen, C. (2002) The effects of representation on students' elaborations in collaborative inquiry. In Stahl, G. (Ed), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002, Boulder, 472-480.
17. Wang, W., Haake, J., Rubart, J. and Tietze, D. A. (2000) Hypermedia-based support for cooperative learning of process knowledge. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23, 357-379.
18. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F. and Mandl, H. (2002) Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2002, Boulder, 573-574.
19. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F. and Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33 (1), 1-30. (Pubitemid 40317592)
20. Wessner, M., Pfister, H.-R. and Miao, Y. (1999) Using learning protocols to structure computer-supported cooperative learning. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 99, 471-476.
21. Zumbach, J. and Reimann, P. (2003) Influence of feedback on distributed problem based learning. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen and U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (June 14-18, 2003) in Bergen, Norway. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer, 219-228.