Turning objects on their heads: The influence of the stored axis on object individuation

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1010-1015

  Harris, Irina M ^a,b   Dux, Paul E ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28844450631     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193627     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. ARNELL, K. M., & JOLICΠUR, P. (1997). Repetition blindness for pseudoobject pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 999-1013.
2. BAVELIER, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words. Cognition, 51, 199-236.
3. CORBALLIS, M. C. (1988). Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95, 115-123.
4. DAVIDOFF, J., & WARRINGTON, E. K. (1999). The bare bones of object recognition: Implications from a case of object recognition impairment. Neuropsychologia, 37, 279-292.
5. DE CARO, S. A. (1998). On the perception of objects and their orientations. Spatial Vision, 11, 385-399.
6. DE CARO, S. A., & REEVES, A. (2000). Rotating objects to determine orientation, not identity: Evidence from a backward-masking/dual-task procedure. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1356-1366.
7. FORSTER, K. I., & FORSTER, J.C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
8. HARRIS, I. M., & Dux, P. E. (2005). Orientation-invariant object recognition: Evidence from repetition blindness. Cognition, 95, 73-93.
9. HARRIS, I. M., HARRIS, J. A., & CAINE, D. (2001). Object orientation agnosia: A failure to find the axis? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 800-812.
10. JOLICΠUR, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
11. KAHNEMAN. D., &TREISMAN. A. M. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 29-61). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
12. KANWISHER, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117-143.
13. KANWISHER, N. G., YIN, C., & WOJCIULIK, E. (1999). Repetition blindness for pictures: Evidence for the rapid computation of abstract visual descriptions. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories: Cognition of brief visual stimuli (pp. 119-150). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. KARNATH, H.-O., FERBER, S., & BÜLTHOFF. H. H. (2000). Neuronal representation of object orientation. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1235-1241.
15. LARGE, M.-E., MCMULLEN. P. A., & HAMM, J. P. (2003). The role of axes of elongation and symmetry in rotated object naming. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1-19.
16. LEEK, E. C. (1998). Effects of stimulus orientation on the identification of common polyoriented objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 650-658.
17. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
18. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE. M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 174-215.
20. TURNBULL, O. H., BESCHIN, N., & DELLA SALA, S. (1997). Agnosia for object orientation: Implications for theories of object recognition. Neuropsychologia, 35, 153-163.
21. TURNBULL, O. H., DELLA SALA, S., & BESCHIN, N. (2002). Agnosia for object orientation: Naming and mental rotation evidence. Neurocase, 8, 296-305.
22. TURNBULL, O. H., LAWS, K. R., & MCCARTHY, R. A. (1995). Object recognition without knowledge of object orientation. Cortex, 31. 387-395.