A student-centered online writing course

User-Centered Computer Aided Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 94-115

  Coit, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247175269     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-750-8.ch005     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Abrami, P. C., Chambers, B., Poulsen, C., DeSimone, C., d'Apollonia, S., & Howden, J. (1995). Classroom connections: Understanding and using cooperative learning. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
2. Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
3. Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2003). Validity and reliability of peer assessments with a missing data estimation technique. Proceedings of ED-Media.
4. Cohen, A. D. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. Wenden & J. Ruben (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
5. Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: Teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 155-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Coit, C. (2004). Peer review in an online college writing course. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies,902-903.
7. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257-276.
8. Dansereau, D. (1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 1. Relating instruction to research (pp. 209-239). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
9. Etheris, A. I., & Tan, S. C. (2004). Computer-supported collaborative problem solving and anchored instruction in a mathematics classroom: An exploratory study. International Journal of Learning Technology, 1(1), 16-39.
10. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
11. Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
12. Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184.
13. Flower, L., Hayes, L., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.
14. Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
15. He, A. (1993). Language use in peer review texts. Language in Society, 22(3), 403-420.
16. Hedgcock, L., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
17. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 141-163.
18. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. Modern Language Journal, 80, 287-308.
19. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1992). Understanding interactive behaviors: Looking at six mirrors of the classroom. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 71-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Kirkus, V., & Miller, N. (1992). Implications of current research on cooperative interaction for classroom application. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 253-280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Hillocks, G. (1982). The interaction of instruction, teacher comment and revision in teaching the composing process. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 261-278.
22. Huff, R., & Kline, C. (1987). The contemporary writing curriculum: Rehearsing, composing, and valuing. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina: Interaction Book Company.
24. Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal, 44, 294-304.
25. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationships of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 303-313.
26. Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
27. Kuhn, D. (1972). Mechanism of change in the development of cognitive structures. Child Development, 43, 833-844.
28. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL student for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24, 203-218.
29. Mackworth, J. (1970). Vigilance and habituation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
30. Makino, T. Y. (1993). Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. ELT Journal, 47, 337-341.
31. Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? ELT Journal, 46, 274-284.
32. Mangelsdorf, K., & Schlumberger, A. (1992). ESL student response stances in a peer-review task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 235-254.
33. Mendonça, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 745-769.
34. Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness of peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113-131.
35. Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? Tesol Quarterly,27(1), 135-141.
36. Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-289.
37. Peckham, L. (1978). Peer evaluation. English Journal, 67, 61-63.
38. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 83-95.
39. Saunders, W. M. (1989). Collaborative writing tasks and peer interaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 101-112.
40. Slavin, R. E. (1992). When and why does cooperative learning increase achievement? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 71-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Villamil, O. S., & Guerrero, M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51-76.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
43. Webb, N. (1989). Student interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 21-31.