Peer review in an online college writing course

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 902-903

  Coit, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMICSTYLE WRITING PRACTICE; ONLINE COURSE; PEER REVIEW; WRITING QUALITY;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DATA REDUCTION; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; RESEARCH; STUDENTS;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 13244299202     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2004.1357712     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: how much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 257-276.
2. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication 32, 400-414.
3. Freedman, S.W. (1992). Outside-in and inside-out: Peer response groups in two ninth-grade classes. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 71-106.
4. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 141-163.
5. Nelson, Gayle L. & Murphy, John M. (1993) Peer Response Groups: Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts? Tesol Quarterly. 27(1): 135-41.
6. Paulus, Trena M., (1999). The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3): 265-89.
7. Villamil, O.S., & de Guerrero, M.C.M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing 5, 51-76.