Using bayesian networks for student modeling

Cognitively Informed Systems: Utilizing Practical Approaches to Enrich Information Presentation and Transfer

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 283-310

  Liu, Chao Lin ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENGCHI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247102788     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-842-0.ch013     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F., Corbett, A., & Lewis, M. W. (1990). Cognitive modelling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence, 42(1), 7-49.
2. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A., Fincham, J., Hoffman, D., & Pelletier, R. (1992). General principles for an intelligent tutoring architecture. In V. Shute & W. Regian (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to automated instruction (pp. 81-106). Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, J. R., Douglass, S., & Qin, Y. (2004). How should a theory of learning and cognition inform instruction? In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications (pp. 47-58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Breese, J., & Ball, G. (1998). Bayesian networks for modeling emotional state and personality: Progress report. AAAI 1998 Fall Symposium Technical Report FS-98-03, 37-42.
5. Breese, J. S., Goldman, R. P., & Wellman, M. P. (1994). Introduction to the special section on knowledge-based construction of probabilistic and decision models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, 1577-1579.
6. Brusilovsky, P. (1994). The construction and application of student models in intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 32(1), 70-89.
7. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E. W., & Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 261-269).
8. Brusilovsky, P., & Vassileva, J. (2003). Course sequencing techniques for large-scale Web-based education. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, 13(1-2), 75-94.
9. Bunt, A., & Conati, C. (2003). Probabilistic student modelling to improve exploratory behaviour. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 13(3), 269-309.
10. Chickering, D. M. (1996). Learning Bayesian networks is NP-complete. In D. Fisher & H.-J. Lenz (Eds.), Learning from data: Artificial intelligence and statistics V (pp. 121-130). Springer Verlag.
11. Collins, J. A., Greer, J. E., & Huang, S. X. (1996). Adaptive assessment using granularity hierarchies and Bayesian net. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 569-577).
12. Conati, C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions during the interaction with educational games. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16(7-8), 555-575.
13. Conati, C., Gertner, A., & VanLehn, K. (2002). Using Bayesian networks to manage uncertainty in student modeling. User Modeling and UserAdapted Interaction, 12(4), 371-417.
14. Conati, C., & VanLehn, K. (2001). Providing adaptive support to the understanding of instructional material. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 41-47).
15. Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A. (2004). SIETTE: A Web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.
16. Cooper, G. F. (1990). The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian networks. Artificial Intelligence, 42(2-3), 393-405.
17. Cooper, G. F. (1999). An overview of the representation and discovery of causal relationships using Bayesian networks. In C. Glymour & G. F. Cooper (Eds.), Computation, causation, & discovery (pp. 3-62). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Cover, T. M., & Thomas J. A. (1991). Elements of information theory. John Wiley & Sons.
19. Dagum, P., & Luby, M. (1993). Approximating probabilistic inference in Bayesian belief networks is NP-hard. Artificial Intelligence, 60(1), 141-153.
20. de Kleer, J. (1986). An assumption-based TMS. Artificial Intelligence, 28, 127-162.
21. de Kleer, J., & Williams, B. C. (1987). Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence, 32, 97-130.
22. Druzdzel, M. J., & Henrion, M. (1993). Efficient reasoning in qualitative probabilistic networks. Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 548-553).
23. El-Gamal, M. A., & Grether, D. M. (1995). Are people Bayesian? Uncovering behavioral strategies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 432, 1137-1145.
24. Guzmán, E., & Conejo, R. (2004). A model for student knowledge diagnosis through adaptive testing. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 12-21).
25. Heckerman, D. (1999). A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks. In M. I. Jordan (Ed.), Learning in graphical models (pp. 301-355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Hoffman, R. R., & Woods, D. D. (2005). Toward a theory of complex and cognitive systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(1), 76-79.
27. Horvitz, E., Breese, J., Heckerman, D., Hovel, D., & Rommelse, K. (1998). The Lumière project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 256-265).
28. Jensen, F. V. (2001). Bayesian networks and decision graphs. Springer Verlag.
29. Kautz, H., Etzioni, O., Fox, D., & Weld, D. (2003, March). Foundations of assisted cognition systems. University of Washington, CSE Technical Report.
30. Kono, Y., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (1994). THEMIS: A nonmonotonic inductive student modeling system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(3), 371-413.
31. Lauritzen, S. L. (1995). The EM algorithm for graphical association models with missing data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 19(2), 191-201.
32. Lauritzen, S. L. (2001). Causal inference from graphical models. In O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, D. R. Cox, & C. Klüppelberg (Eds.), Complex stochastic systems (pp. 63-108). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
33. Liu, C.-L. (2005). Using mutual information for adaptive item comparison and student assessment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 100-119.
34. Martin, J., & VanLehn, K. (1995). Student assessment using Bayesian nets. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42(6), 575-591.
35. Mayo, M., & Mitrovic, A. (2000). Using a probabilistic student model to control problem difficult. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 524-533).
36. Mayo, M., & Mitrovic, A. (2001). Optimising ITS behaviour with Bayesian networks and decision theory. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 124-153.
37. Millán, E., & Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L. (2002). A Bayesian diagnostic algorithm for student modeling and its evaluation. User Modeling and UserAdapted Interaction, 12(2-3), 281-330.
38. Millán, E., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L., & García, F. (2003). Dynamic versus static student models based on Bayesian networks: An empirical study. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on KnowledgeBased Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (pp. 1337-1344).
39. Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., Yan, D., & Steinberg, L. S. (1999). Bayes nets in educational assessment: Where do the numbers come from? Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 437-446).
40. Mislevy, R. J., & Gitomer, D. H. (1996). The role of probability-based inference in an intelligent tutoring system. User Modeling and UserAdapted Interaction, 5(4), 253-282.
41. Mislevy, R. J., Steingerg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(1), 3-62.
42. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., & Mayo, M. (2002). Using evaluation to shape ITS design: Results and experiences with SQL-Tutor. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12(2-3), 243-279.
43. Murray, R. C., & VanLehn, K. (2000). DT Tutor: A decision-theoretic, dynamic approach for optimal selection of tutorial actions. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 153-162).
44. Neapolitan, R. E. (2004). Learning Bayesian networks. Prentice Hall.
45. Pearl, J. (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann.
46. Pearl, J. (1995). Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika, 82(4), 669-688.
47. Reye, J. (2004). Student modeling based on belief networks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 63-96.
48. nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
49. Shachter, R. D. (1986). Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Research, 34(6), 871-882.
50. Sison, R., & Shimura, M. (1998). Student modeling and machine learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 128-158.
51. Tsiriga, V., & Virvou, M. (2004). A framework for the initialization of student models in Web-based intelligent tutoring systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 14(4), 289-316.
52. VanLehn, K., Ohlsson, S., & Nason, R. (1994). Applications of simulated stu-dents: An exploration. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(2), 135-175.
53. van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (Eds.). (2000). Computerized adaptive testing: Theory and practice. Kluwer.
54. van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer Verlag.
55. Villano, M. (1992). Probabilistic student models: Bayesian belief networks and knowledge space theory. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 491-498).
56. Virvou, M., Maras, D., & Tsiriga, V. (2000). Student modelling in an intelligent tutoring system for the passive voice of English language. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 139-150.
57. Virvou, M., & Moundridou, M. (2001). Adding an instructor modelling component to the architecture of ITS authoring tools. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 185-211.
58. nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
59. Wang, Y.-T., & Liu, C.-L. (2004). An exploration of mapping the learning processes of composite concepts. Proceedings of the Ninth TAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Applications, CD-ROM. (In Chinese.)
60. Wellman, M. P. (1990). Fundamental concepts of qualitative probabilistic net-works. Artificial Intelligence, 44(3), 257-303.
61. Zapata-Rivera, J.-D., & Greer, J. E. (2004). Interacting with inspectable Bayesian student models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 127-163.