SIETTE: A web-based tool for adaptive testing

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 29-61

  Conejo, Ricardo ^a   Guzmán, Eduardo ^a   Millán, Eva ^a   Trella, Mónica ^a   Luis Pérez De La Cruz, José ^a   Ríos, Antonia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010051568     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arroyo, I., Conejo, R., Guzmám, E., & Woolf, B. P. (2001). An Adaptive Web-based Component for Cognitive Ability Estimation. In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future (pp. 456-466). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
2. Belmonte, M.V., Guzmán, E., Mandow, L., Millán, E., & Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L. (2002). Automatic generation of problems in web-based tutors. In B. Howlet, B and L. Jain (Eds.) Internet-Based Teaching and Learning. Series on Advance Information Processing. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
3. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Inferring an Examinee’s Mental Ability. In F. M. Lord, & M. R. Novick (Eds.) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Conejo, R., Millán, E., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L., & Trella, M. (2000). An Empirical Approach to On-Line Learning in SIETTE. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1839. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems ITS’2000 (pp. 604-614). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
5. Eliot, C., Neiman, D., & LaMar, M. (1997). Medtec: A Web-based Intelligent Tutor for Basic Anatomy. Proceedings of WebNet’97, Second World Conference of the WWW, Internet and Intranet (pp. 161-165). ACCE.
6. Flaugher, R. (1990). Item Pools. In H. Wainer (Ed.) Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Hambleton, R. K. (1989). Principles and Selected Applications of Item Response Theory. In R. L. Linn (Ed.) Educational Measurement. New York: MacMillan.
8. Huang, S. X. (1996). On Content-Balanced Adaptive Testing. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1108. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference CALISCE’96 (pp. 60-68). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Intralearn. URL http://www.intranet.com [Accessed 2001, May 21].
9. Kingsbury, G., & Weiss, D. J. (1983). A Comparison of IRT-based Adaptive Mastery Testing and Sequential Mastery Testing Procedure. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.) New Horizons in Testing: Latent Trait Test Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing. New York: Academic Press.
10. Kingsbury, G., & Zara, A. R. (1989). Procedures for Selecting Items for Computerized Adaptive Tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2(4), 359-375.
11. Lee, S. H., & Wang, C. J. (1997). Intelligent Hypermedia Learning System on the Distributed Environment. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM’97, World Conference on Educational Multimedia/Hypermedia and on Educational Telecommunications (pp. 625-630). ACCE.
12. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Lord, F. M. (1970). Some test theory for tailored testing. In W. H. Holtzman (Ed.) Computer assisted instruction, testing and guidance (pp. 139-183). New York: Harper and Row.
14. Lord, F. M. &. Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Millán, E. (2000). Bayesian System for Student Modeling. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Málaga, Dpto. de Lenguajes y Ciencias de la Computación. Available (in Spanish) at http://www.lcc.uma.es/-eva/investigacion/tesis.html.
16. Millán, E., & Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L. (2002): A Bayesian Diagnostic Algorithm for Student Modeling and its Evaluation. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 12, 281-330.
17. Millán, E., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L., & Suárez, E. (2000). An Adaptive Bayesian Network for Multilevel Student Modelling. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1839. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems ITS’2000 (pp. 534-543). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
18. Mislevy, R. J., & Almond, R. (1997). Graphical Models and Computerized Adaptive Testing. Center of the Study of Evaluation (CSE).
19. Olea, J., & Ponsoda, V. (1996). Tests adaptativos informatizados. In J. Muñiz (Ed.) Psicometría (pp. 731-783). Madrid: Universitas.
20. Owen, R. J. (1975). A Bayesian Sequential Procedure for Quantal Response in the Context of Adaptive Mental Testing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 351-371.
21. Question Mark. URL http://www.questionmark.com/us/home.htm [Accessed 2001, May 21].
22. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Test. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
23. Ríos, A., Conejo, R., Trella, M., Millán, E., & Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L. (1999). Aprendizaje automático de las curvas características de las preguntas en un sistema de generación automática de tests. In Actas de la Conferencia Española para la Inteligencia ArtificialCAEPIA’99.
24. Ríos, A., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L., & Conejo, R. (1999). Internet Based Evaluation System. In Open Learning Environments: New Computational Technologies to Support Learning, Exploration and Collaboration. Proceedings of the 9th World Conference of Artificial Intelligence and Education AIED’99 (pp. 387-394). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
25. Rudner, L. (1998). An On-line, Interactive, Computer Adaptive Testing Mini-Tutorial. http://ericae.net/scripts/cat/catdemo.
26. Thissen, D., & Mislevy, R. (1990). Testing Algorithms. In H. Wainer (Ed.) Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (pp. 103-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Top Class. URL http://topclass.uncg.edu/ [Accessed 2001, May 21].
28. Van der Linden, W. J. (1998). Bayesian Item Selection Criteria for Adaptive Testing. Psychometrika, 63(2), 201-216.
29. Van der Linden, W., & Hambleton, R. (1997). Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer Verlag.
30. VanLehn, K., Ohlsson, S., & Nason, R. (1995). Applications of Simulated Students: An Exploration. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 5(2), 135-175.
31. Wainer, H. (1990). Computerized Adaptive Testing: a Primer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Wainer, H., & Mislevy, R. (1990). Item Response Theory, Item Calibration and Proficiency Estimation. In H. Wainer (Ed.) Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer (pp. 65-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
33. Webassessor. URL http://www.webassessor.com/index.htm [Accessed 2001, May 21].
34. Web CT. URL http://www.webct.com [Accessed 2001, May 21].
35. Weber, G., & Specht, M. (1997). User Modeling and Adaptive Navigation Support in WWW-based Tutoring Systems. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on User Modelling UM’97 Vienna, New York: Springer.
36. Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving Measurement Quality and Efficiency with Adaptive Testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 473-492.
37. Welch, R., & Frick, T. W. (1993). Computerized Adaptive Testing in Instructional Settings. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 47-62.