Designing spatially-explicit reserve networks in the presence of mandatory sites

Biological Conservation

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 254-262

  Alagador, Diogo ^a,b   Cerdeira, J Orestes ^a  

^a INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE AGRONOMIA   (Portugal)

^b MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

Author keywords

0 1 linear programming; Connectivity; Irreplaceability; Reserve design; Spatial attributes

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; RESERVE DESIGN;

AVES; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 34147120047     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Araújo M.B., Williams P.H., and Turner A. A sequential approach to minimise threats within selected conservation areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 11 6 (2002) 1011-1024
2. Araújo M.B., Cabeza M., Thuiller W., Hannah L., and Williams P.H. Would climate change drive species out of reserves? an assessment of existing reserve-selection methods. Global Change Biology 10 9 (2004) 1618-1626
3. Briers R.A. Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biological Conservation 103 1 (2002) 77-83
4. Brokaw N. Fragments past, present and future. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13 10 (1998) 382-383
5. Cabeza M. Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design. Ecology Letters 6 7 (2003) 665-672
6. Cabeza M., and Moilanen A. Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16 5 (2001) 242-248
7. Cabeza M., Araújo M.B., Wilson R.J., Thomas C.D., Cowley M.J.R., and Moilanen A. Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design. Journal of Applied Ecology 41 2 (2004) 252-262
8. Calabrese J.M., and Fagan W.F. A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2 10 (2004) 529-536
9. Cerdeira J.O., and Pinto L.S. Requiring connectivity in the set covering problem. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization 9 (2005) 35-47
10. Cerdeira J.O., Gaston K.J., and Pinto L.S. Connectivity in priority area selection for conservation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10 3 (2005) 183-192
11. Clemens M., Revelle C., and Williams J. Reserve design for species preservation. European Journal of Operational Research 112 (1999) 273-283
12. Cocks K.D., and Baird I.A. Using mathematical programming to address the multiple reserve selection problem: an example from the eyre peninsula, south Australia. Biological Conservation 49 (1989) 103-130
13. Collinge S.K. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: Implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 36 1 (1996) 59-77
14. Diamond J. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design ofnature reserves. Biological Conservation 7 (1975) 129-146
15. Fahrig L. Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecological Applications 12 (2002) 346-353
16. Fischer D.T., and Church R.L. Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. Forest Science 49 4 (2003) 555-565
17. Fischer D.T., and Church R.L. The sites reserve selection system: a critical review. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10 3 (2005) 215-228
18. Frank K., and Wissel C. Spatial aspects of metapopulation survival: from model results to rules of thumb for landscape management. Landscape Ecology 13 6 (1998) 363-379
19. Fuller T., Munguia M., Mayfield M., Sanchez-Cordero V., and Sarkar S. Incorporating connectivity into conservation planning: a multi-criteria case study from central mexico. Biological Conservation 133 2 (2006) 131-142
20. Gaston K.J., Pressey R.L., and Margules C.R. Persistence and vulnerability: retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas. Journal of Biosciences 27 4 (2002) 361-384
21. Hanski I. Metapopulation Ecology (1999), Oxford University Press, UK
22. Hanski I., and Ovaskainen O. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404 6779 (2000) 755-758
23. Hill J.K., Collingham Y.C., and Thomas C.D. Impacts of landscape structure on butterfly range expansion. Ecology Letters 4 (2001) 313-321
24. Hinsley S.A., Bellamy P.E., and Newton I. Habitat and landscape factors influencing the presence of individual breeding bird species in woodland fragments. Journal Avian Biology 26 (1995) 94-104
25. Kapos, V., Lysenko, I., Lesslie, R., 2000. Assessing forest integrity and naturalness in relation to biodiversity. Technical Report, FAO.
26. Lande R. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241 4872 (1988) 1455-1460
27. Macdonald D.W., and Johnson D.D.P. Dispersal in theory and practice: consequences for conservation biology. In: Clobert J., Danchin E., Dhondt A.A., and Nichols J.D. (Eds). Dispersal (2001), Oxford University Press, UK 358-372
28. Mace G., Balmford A., and Ginsberg J.R. Conservation in a Changing World (1998), Cambridge University Press, UK
29. Malcolm S.A., and ReVelle C. Rebuilding migratory flyways using directed conditional covering. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 2 (2002) 129-138
30. Malcolm S.A., and ReVelle C. Representational success: a new paradigm for achieving species protection by reserve site selection. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10 4 (2005) 341-348
31. Margules C.R., and Pressey R.L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405 6783 (2000) 243-253
32. Margules C., Higgs A.J., and Rafe R.W. Modern biogeographic theory: are there any lessons for nature reserve design. Biological Conservation 24 2 (1982) 115-128
33. McDonnell M.D., Possingham H.P., Ball I.R., and Cousins E.A. Mathematical methods for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 7 2 (2002) 107-114
34. Miller J.R., and Calle P. Behavioural mechanisms and habitat use by birds in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Ecological Applications 10 (2000) 1732-1748
35. Moilanen A. Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models. American Naturalist 165 6 (2005) 695-706
36. Moilanen A., and Hanski I. On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Oikos 95 1 (2001) 147-151
37. Moilanen A., and Cabeza M. Single-species dynamic site selection. Ecological Applications 12 3 (2002) 913-926
38. Moilanen A., and Wintle B.A. Uncertainty analysis favours selection of spatially aggregated reserve networks. Biological Conservation 129 3 (2006) 427-434
39. Nalle D.J., Arthur J.L., and Sessions J. Designing compact and contiguous reserve networks with a hybrid heuristic algorithm. Forest Science 48 1 (2002) 59-68
40. Nicholls A.O., and Margules C.R. An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biological Conservation 64 2 (1993) 165-169
41. Önal H., and Briers R.A. Incorporating spatial criteria in optimum reserve network selection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 269 1508 (2002) 2437-2441
42. Önal H., and Briers R.A. Selection of a minimum-boundary reserve network using integer programming. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 270 1523 (2003) 1487-1491
43. Önal H., and Briers R.A. Designing a conservation reserve network with minimal fragmentation: a linear integer programming approach. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10 3 (2005) 193-202
44. Önal H., and Briers R.A. Optimal selection of a connected reserve network. Operations Research 54 2 (2006) 379-388
45. Opdam P., Verboom J., and Pouwels R. Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecology 18 2 (2003) 113-126
46. Pimm S.L., and Lawton J.H. Ecology: planning for biodiversity. Science 279 5359 (1998) 2068-2069
47. Possingham H.P., Ball I.R., and Andelman S. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology (2000), Springer, NY, USA 291-305
48. Pressey R.L., Humphries C.J., Margules C.R., Vanewright R.I., and Williams P.H. Beyond opportunism - key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 8 4 (1993) 124-128
49. Pressey R.L., Johnson I.R., and Wilson P.D. Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal. Biodiversity and Conservation 3 3 (1994) 242-262
50. Pressey R.L., Possingham H.P., and Day J.R. Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biological Conservation 80 2 (1997) 207-219
51. Pressey R.L., Cowling R.M., and Rouget M. Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the cape floristic region, south Africa. Biological Conservation 112 1-2 (2003) 99-127
52. Rodrigues A.S., Cerdeira J.O., and Gaston K.J. Flexibility, efficiency and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography 23 (2000) 565-574
53. Sawford B. The Butterflies of Hertfordshire (1987), Castlemead Publications, UK
54. Scott J.M., Davis F., Csuti B., Noss R., Butterfield B., Groves C., Anderson H., Caicco S., D'Erchia F., Edwards Jr. T.C., Ulliman J., and Wright R.G. A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123 (1993) 1-41
55. Shafer C. Us national park buffer zones: historical, scientific, social, and legal aspects. Environmental Management 23 (1999) 49-73
56. Standley P., Bucknell N.J., Swash A., and Collins I.D. The Birds of Berkshire (1996), Berkshire Atlas Group, UK
57. Thomas C.D., and Hanski I. Butterfly metapopulations. In: Hanski I., and Gilpin M.E. (Eds). Ecology, Genetics and Evolution (1997), Academic Press, UK 359-386
58. Tischendorf L., and Fahrig L. How should we measure landscape connectivity?. Landscape Ecology 15 7 (2000) 633-641
59. Van Teeffelen A.J.A., Cabeza M., and Moilanen A. Connectivity, probabilities and persistence: comparing reserve selection strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation 15 3 (2006) 899-919
60. Westphal M.I., and Possingham H.P. Applying a decision-theory framework to landscape planning for biodiversity: follow-up to watson et al. Conservation Biology 17 1 (2003) 327-329
61. Williams P.H. Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity. In: Mace G., Balmford A., and Ginsberg J.R. (Eds). Conservation in a Changing World (1998), Cambridge University Press, UK 221-249
62. Williams J.C. A zero-one programming model for contiguous land acquisition. Geographical Analysis 34 4 (2002) 330-349
63. Williams, J.C., 2006. Optimal reserve site selection with distance requirements, Computers and Operations Research, doi:10.1016/j.cor.2006.03.007.
64. Williams J.C., and ReVelle C.S. Reserve assemblage of critical areas: a zero-one programming approach. European Journal of Operational Research 104 3 (1998) 497-509
65. Williams P.H., Moore J.L., Toham A.K., Brooks T.M., Strand H., D'Amico J., Wisz M., Burgess D., Balmford A., and Rahbek C. Integrating biodiversity priorities with conflicting socio-economic values in the guinean-congolian forest region. Biodiversity and Conservation 12 6 (2003) 1297-1320
66. Williams P., Hannah L., Andelman S., Midgley G., Araújo M., Hughes G., Manne L., Martinez-Meyer E., and Pearson R. Planning for climate change: identifying minimum-dispersal corridors for the cape proteaceae. Conservation Biology 19 4 (2005) 1063-1074
67. With K.A., and King A.W. The use and misuse of neutral landscape models in ecology. Oikos 79 2 (1997) 219-229
68. Woodroffe R., and Ginsberg J.R. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280 5372 (1998) 2126-2128
69. Zidema P.A., Sayer J.A., and Dijkman W. Forest fragmentation and biodiversity: the case of intermediate-sized conservation areas. Environmental Conservation 23 (1996) 290-297