Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design

Ecology Letters

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 665-672

  Cabeza, Mar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Dispersal; Habitat loss; Metapopulation; Probability models; Reserve selection

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; CONNECTIVITY; DISPERSAL; HABITAT LOSS; HABITAT QUALITY; RESERVE DESIGN; SITE SELECTION;

UNITED KINGDOM;

LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 0038080198     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00475.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Araújo, M.B. & Williams, P.H. (2000). Selecting areas for species persistence using occurrence data. Biol. Conserv., 96, 331-345.
2. Araújo, M.B., Williams, P.H. & Fuller, R.J. (2002). Dynamics of extinction and the selection of nature reserves. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269, 1970-1980.
3. Bedward, M., Pressey, R.L. & Keith, D.A. (1992). A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biol. Conserv., 62, 115-125.
4. Briers, R.A. (2002). Incorporating connectivity into reserve selection procedures. Biol. Conserv., 103, 77-83.
5. Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA.
6. Cabeza, M. & Moilanen, A. (2001) Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol., 16, 242-248.
7. Cabeza, M. & Moilanen, A. (2003). Site selection algorithms and habitat loss. Conserv. Biol. (in press).
8. Cabeza, M., Moilanen, A. & Possingham, H.P. (2003). Metapopulation dynamics and reserve-network design. In: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations (eds Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O.). Academic Press, New York (in press).
9. Camm, J.D., Polaski, S., Solow, A. & Csuti, B. (1996). A note on optimal algorithms for reserve site selection. Biol. Conserv., 78, 353-355.
10. Church, R.L., Stoms, D.M. & Davis, F.W. (1996). Reserve selection as maximal covering location problem. Biol. Conserv., 76, 105-112.
11. Cowley, M.J.R., Wilson, R.J., León-Cortés, J.L., Gutiérrez, D., Bulman, C.R. & Thomas, C.D. (2000). Habitat-based statistical models for predicting the spatial distribution of butterflies and day-flying moths in a fragmented landscape. J. Appl. Ecol., 37, 60-72.
12. Cowley, M.J.R., Thomas, C.D., Roy, D.B., Wilson, R.J., León-Cortés, J.L., Gutiérrez, D. et al. (2001). Density-distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. J. Anim. Ecol., 70, 410-425.
13. Cowling, R.M., Pressey, R., Lombard, A.T., Desmet, P.G. & Ellis, A.G. (1999). From representation to persistence: requirements for a sustainable reserve system in the species-rich mediterranean-climate deserts of southern Africa. Divers. Distrib., 5, 51-71.
14. Csuti, B., Polaski, S., Williams, P.H., Pressey, R., Camm, J.D., Kershaw, M. et al. (1997). A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon. Biol. Conserv., 80, 83-97.
15. Gutiérrez, D., Thomas, C.D. & León-Cortés, J.L. (1999). Dispersal, distribution, patch network and metapopulation dynamics of the dingy skipper butterfly (Erynis tages). Oecologia, 121, 506-517.
16. Hanski, I. (1994). A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. J. Anim. Ecol., 63, 151-162.
17. Hanski, I. (1999). Metapopulation Ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Kiester, R., Scott, M., Csuti, B., Noss, R.F., Butterfield, B., Sahr, K. et al. (1996). Conservation prioritization using gap data. Conserv. Biol., 10, 1332-1342.
19. Kirkpatrick, J.B. (1983). An iterative method for establishing priorities for the selection of nature reserves: an example from Tasmania. Biol. Conserv., 25, 127-134.
20. Lewis, O.T., Thomas, C.D., Hill, J.K., Brookes, M.I., Crane, T.P.R., Graneau, Y.A. et al. (1997). Three ways of assessing metapopulation structure in the butterfly Plebejus argus. Ecol. Entomol., 22, 283-293.
21. Margules, C.R., Pressey, R.L. & Williams, P.H. (2002). Representing biodiversity: data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation. J. Biosci., 4, 309-326.
22. Moilanen, A. & Hanski, I. (2001). On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Oikos, 95, 147-151.
23. Moilanen, A. & Nieminen, M. (2002). simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology, 83, 1131-1145.
24. Nicholls, A.O. (1998). Integrating population abundance, dynamics and distribution into broad-scale priority setting. In: Conservation in a Changing World (eds Mace, G., Balmford, A. & Gingsberg, J.R.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25. Nicholls, A.O. & Margules, C.R. (1993). An upgraded reserve selection algorithm. Biol. Conserv., 64, 165-169.
26. Possingham, H., Day, J., Goldfinch, M. & Salzborn, F. (1993). In: Proceedings of the 12th Australian Operation Research Conference (eds Sutton, D.J., Pearce, C.E.M. & Cousins, E.A.). Adelaide University, Adelaide, pp. 536-545.
27. Possingham, H.P., Ball, I. & Andelman, S. (2000). Mathematical methods for reserve system design. In: Quantitative Methods for Conservation Biology (eds Ferson, S. & Burgman, M.). Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 291-306.
28. Pressey, R. & Taffs, K.H. (2001). Scheduling conservation action in production landscapes: priority areas in western New South Wales defined by irreplaceability and vulnerability to vegetation loss. Biol. Conserv., 100, 155-376.
29. Pressey, R.L., Humphries, C.J., Margules, C.R., Vane-Wright, R.I. & Williams, P.H. (1993). Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol., 8, 124-128.
30. Pressey, R.L., Possingham, H.P. & Margules, C.R. (1996). Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: when does it matter and how much? Biol. Conserv., 76, 259-267.
31. Rodrigues, A.S. & Gaston, K.J. (2002). Optimisation in reserve selection procedures - why not? Biol. Conserv., 107, 123-129.
32. Rodrigues, A.S., Tratt, R., Wheeler, B.D. & Gaston, K.J. (1999). The performance of existing networks of conservation areas in representing biodiversity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 266, 1453-1460.
33. Thomas, C.D. & Hanski, I. (1997). Butterfly metapopulations. In: Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics and Evolution (eds Hanski, I. & Gilpin, M.E.). Academic Press, London, pp. 359-386.
34. Thomas, C.D., Wilson, R.J. & Lewis, O.T. (2002). Short-term studies underestimate 30-generation changes in a butterfly metapopulation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269, 563-569.
35. Underhill, L.G. (1994). Optimal and suboptimal reserve selection algorithms. Biol. Conserv., 70, 85-87.
36. Williams, P.H. (1998a). Key sites for conservation: area-selection methods for biodiversity. In: Conservation in a Changing World (eds Mace, G., Balmford, A. & Gingsberg, J.R. ). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Williams, J.C. (1998b). Delineating protected wildlife corridors with multi-objective programming. Environ. Modell. Assess., 3, 77-86.
38. Williams, J.C. & ReVelle, C.S. (1998). Reserve assemblage of critical areas: a zero-one programming approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 104, 497-509.
39. Williams, P.H. & Araújo, M.B. (2000). Using probabilities of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proc. R. Soc. Lon. B Biol. Sci., 267, 1959-1966.
40. Williams, P.H. & Araújo, M.B. (2002). Apples, oranges, and probabilities: integrating multiple factors into biodiversity conservation with consistency. Environ. Model. Assess. (Special Issue: Reserve Design Modeling), 7, 139-151.
41. Wilson, R.J. & Thomas, C.D. (2002). Dispersal and the spatial dynamics of butterfly populations. In: Dispersal Ecology (eds Bullock, J.M., Kenward, R.E. & Hails, R.H.). Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 257-278.
42. Wilson, R.J., Ellis, S.M., Baker, J.S., Lineham, M.E., Whitehead, R. & Thomas, C.D. (2002). Large-scale patterns of distribution and persistence at the range margins of a butterfly. Ecology, 83, 3357-3368.