The phenotypic and genetic covariance structure of drosphilid wings

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 902-911

  McGuigan, Katrina ^a   Blows, Mark W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Evolutionary potential; G matrix; Genetic constraints; Matrix rank; P matrix; Sexual dimorphism; Wing shape

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; FLY; GENETIC STRUCTURE; GENETIC VARIATION; MODELING; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; WING MORPHOLOGY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FORELIMB; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MALE; PHENOTYPE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUEENSLAND; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX CHARACTERISTICS; VARIATION (GENETICS); WING;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA;

DROSOPHILA CF. SERRATA MS-2004;

EID: 34047218357     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00078.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Amemiya, Y. 1985. What should be done when an estimated between group covariance matrix is not nonnegative definite. Am. Stat. 39:112-117.
2. Amemiya, Y., T. W. Anderson, and P. A. W. Lewis. 1990. Percentage points for a test of rank in multivariate components of variance. Biometrika 77:637-641.
3. Anderson, T. W., and Y. Amemiya. 1991. Testing dimensionality in the multivariate-analysis of variance. Stat. Probabil. Lett. 12:445-463.
4. Arnold, S. J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140:S85-S107.
5. Arnold, S. J., and P. C. Phillips. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53:1516-1527.
6. Arnold, S. J., M. E. Pfrender, and A. G. Jones. 2001. The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macro-evolution. Genetica 112:9-32.
7. Baker, R. H., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of correlation structure in stalk-eyed flies (Diasemopsis, Diopsidae). Evolution 57:87-103.
8. Blows, M. W., S. F. Chenoweth, and E. Hine. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am. Nat. 163:329-340.
9. Blows, M. W., and A. A. Hoffmann. 2005. A reassessment of genetic limits to evolutionary change. Ecology 86:1371-1384.
10. Cheverud, J. M. 1982. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36:499-516.
11. _. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 10:155-171.
12. _. 1988. A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42:958-968.
13. Combes, S. A., and T. L. Daniel. 2003. Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation. J. Exp. Biol. 206:2979-2987.
14. Cowley, D. E., W. R. Atchley, and J. J. Rutledge. 1986. Quantitative genetics of Drosophila melanogaster.1. Sexual dimorphism in genetic parameters for wing traits. Genetics 114:549-566.
15. Dickerson, G. E. 1955. Genetic slippage in response to selection for multiple objectives. Cold Spring Harb. Sym. 20:213-224.
16. Ennos, A. R. 1988a. The importance of torsion in the design of insect wings. J. Exp. Biol. 140:137-160.
17. _. 1988b. The inertial cause of wing rotation in Diptera. J. Exp. Biol. 140:161-169.
18. Fisher, R. A. S. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K.
19. French, V., M. Feast, and L. Partridge. 1998. Body size and cell size in Drosophila: the developmental response to temperature. J. Insect Physiol. 64:1081-1089.
20. Fristrup, K. M. 2001. A history of character concepts in evolutionary biology. Pp. 13-35 in G. P. Wagner, ed. The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
21. Gilchrist, A. S., R. B. R. Azevedo, L. Partridge, and P. O'Higgins. 2000. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape. Evol. Dev. 2:114-124.
22. Gilchrist, G. W., R. B. Huey, J. Balanya, M. Pascual, and L. Serra. 2004. A time series of evolution in action: a latitudinal cline in wing size in South American Drosophila subobscura. Evolution 58:768-780.
23. Hadfield, J. D., A. Nutall, D. Osorio, and I. P. F. Owens. 2006. Testing the phenotypic gambit: phenotypic, genetic and environmental correlations of colour. J. Evol. Biol. 20:549-557.
24. Hall, M., A. K. Lindholm, and R. Brooks. 2004. Direct selection on male attractiveness and female preference fails to produce a response. BMC Evol. Biol. 4:1.
25. Hegmann, J. P., and J. C. Defries. 1970. Are genetic correlations and environmental correlations correlated? Nature 226:284-286.
26. Hine, E., and M. W. Blows. 2006. Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 173:1135-1144.
27. Hoffmann, A. A., and J. Shirriffs. 2002. Geographic variation for wing shape in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 56:1068-1073.
28. Kennedy, B. W., J. H. J. Vanderwerf, and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 1993. Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. J. Anim. Sci. 71:3239-3250.
29. Kelemen, L., and C. Moritz. 1999. Comparative phylogeography of a sibling pair of rainforest Drosophila species (Drosophila serrata and D. birchii). Evolution 53:1306-1311.
30. Kellermann, V. M., B. van Heerwaarden, A. A. Hoffmann, and C. M. Sgró. 2006. Very low additive genetic variance and evolutionary potential in multiple populations of two rainforest Drosophila species. Evolution 60:1104-1108.
31. Kirkpatrick, M., and D. Lofsvold. 1992. Measuring selection and constraint in the evolution of growth. Evolution 46:954-971.
32. Kirkpatrick, M., and K. Meyer. 2004. Direct estimation of genetic principal components: simplified analysis of complex phenotypes. Genetics 168:2295-2306.
33. Klingenberg, C. P., and L. J. Leamy. 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55:2342-2352.
34. Klingenberg, C. P., and G. S. McIntyre. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with procrustes methods. Evolution 52:1363-1375.
35. Klingenberg, C. P., and S. D. Zaklan. 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54:1273-1285.
36. Koots, K. R., and J. P. Gibson. 1996. Realized sampling variances of estimates of genetic parameters and the difference between genetic and phenotypic correlations. Genetics 143:1409-1416.
37. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30:314-334.
38. _. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
39. _. 1980. The genetic covariances between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94:203-215.
40. _. 1982. A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63:607-615.
41. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:110-126.
42. Lewontin, R. C. 1978. Adaptation. Sci. Am. 239:157-169.
43. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
44. McCollum, M. A. 1999. The robust australopithecine face: a morphogenetic perspective. Science 284:301-305.
45. McGuigan, K. 2006. Studying phenotypic evolution using multivariate quantitative genetics. Mol. Ecol. 15:883-896.
46. Meyer, K., and M. Kirkpatrick. 2005. Restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic principal components and smoothed covariance matrices. Genet. Sel. Evol. 37:1-30.
47. Mezey, J. G., J. M. Cheverud, and G. P. Wagner. 2000. Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data. Genetics 156:305-311.
48. Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:1027-1038.
49. Moore, A. J., and P. J. Moore. 1999. Balancing sexual selection through opposing mate choice and male competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:711-716.
50. Orr, H. A. 2000. Adaptation and the cost of complexity. Evolution 54:13-20.
51. Partridge, L., A. Hoffmann, and J. S. Jones. 1987. Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura under field conditions. Anim. Behav. 35:468-476.
52. Pease, C. M., and J. J. Bull. 1988. A critique of methods for measuring life history trade-offs. J. Evolution Biol. 1:293-303.
53. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:1506-1515.
54. Phillips, P. C., M. C. Whitlock, and K. Fowler. 2001. Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158:1137-1145.
55. Price, T., M. Turelli, and M. Slatkin. 1993. Peak shifts produced by correlated response to selection. Evolution 47:280-290.
56. Reed, D. H., and R. Frankham. 2001. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55:1095-1103.
57. Roff, D. A. 1995. The estimation of genetic correlations from phenotypic correlations: a test of Cheverud's conjecture. Heredity 74:481-490.
58. _. 1996. The evolution of genetic correlations: an analysis of patterns. Evolution 50:1392-1403.
59. Rohlf, F. J., and D. E. Slice. 1990. Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39:40-59.
60. Rohlf, F. J. 1999. Shape statistics: procrustes superimpositions and tangent spaces. J. Classif. 16:197-223.
61. _. 2004. tpsDig2. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY. Available at http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.
62. Rundle, H. D., S. F. Chenoweth, P. Doughty, and M. W. Blows. 2005. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. PLos Biol. 3:1988-1995.
63. Schiffer, M., M. E. Carew, and A. A. Hoffmann. 2004. Molecular, morphological and behavioural data reveal the presence of a cryptic species in the widely studied Drosophila serrata species complex. J. Evolution Biol. 17:430-442.
64. Schiffer, M., and S. F. McEvey. 2006. Drosophila bunnanda: a new species from northern Australia with notes on other Australian members of the montium subgroup (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Zootaxa 1333:1-23.
65. Shaw, R. G. 1991. The comparison of quantitative genetic parameters between populations. Evolution 45:143-151.
66. Sheets, H. D. 2001. IMP: Integrated Morphometrics Package. Physics Department, Canisius College, Buffalo, NY. Available at http://www.canisius.edu/ ~sheets/morphsoft.html.
67. Sisodia, S., and B. N. Singh. 2004. Size dependent sexual selection in Drosophila ananassae. Genetica 121:207-217.
68. Slice, D. E. 1998. Morpheus et al. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY. Available at http://life.bio. sunysb.edu/morph/morpheus/
69. Steppan, S. J. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypic covariance structure.1. Contrasting results from matrix correlation and common principal component analyses. Evolution 51:571-586.
70. Steppan, S. J., P. C. Phillips, and D. Houle. 2002. Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:320-327.
71. Turelli, M. 1988. Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances, and the maintenance of additive variances. Evolution 42:1342-1347.
72. Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg. 1996. Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967-976.
73. Waitt, D. E., and D. A. Levin. 1998. Genetic and phenotypic correlations in plants: a botanical test of Cheverud's conjecture. Heredity 80:310-319.
74. Weber, K. E. 1996. Large genetic change at small fitness cost in large populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for wind tunnel flight: rethinking fitness surfaces. Genetics 144:205-213.
75. Willis, J. H., J. A. Coyne, and M. Kirkpatrick. 1991. Can one predict the evolution of quantitative characters without genetics? Evolution 45:441-444.
76. Wootton, R. J., R. C. Herbert, P. G. Young, and K. E. Evans. 2003. Approaches to the structural modeling of insect wings. Philos. T. R. Soc. B 358:1577-1587.
77. Zeng, Z.-B. 1988. Long-term correlated response, inter-population covariation and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42:363-374.
78. Zimmerman, E., A. Palsson, and G. Gibson. 2000. Quantitative trait loci affecting components of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 155:671-683.