Reactivity to patch tests with nickel sulfate and fragrance mix in infants

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 141-147

  Johnke H ^a   Norberg, L A ^a   Vach, W ^b   Bindslev Jensen, C ^a   Host A ^a   Andersen, Klaus E ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Clinical relevance; Fragrance mix; Infants; Nickel sulfate; Patch testing; Reproducibility; Transient reactivity

Indexed keywords

FRAGRANCE; NICKEL SULFATE;

ARTICLE; CHILD; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATCH TEST; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ALLERGENS; DENMARK; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; IRRITANTS; MALE; NICKEL; PATCH TESTS; PERFUME; PREVALENCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 7044224979     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00425.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Veien N K, Hattel T, Justesen O, Norholm A. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis 1982: 8: 373-375.
2. Weston W L, Weston J A, Kinoshita J et al. Prevalence of positive epicutaneous tests among infants, children, and adolescents. Pediatrics 1986: 78: 1070-1074.
3. Barros M A, Baptista A, Correia T M, Azevedo F. Patch testing in children. a study of 562 schoolchildren. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 156-159.
4. Bruckner A L, Weston W L, Morelli J G. Does sensitization to contact allergens begin in infancy? Pediatrics 2000: 105: e3.
5. Rastogi S C, Johansen J D, Menne T et al. Contents of fragrance allergens in children's cosmetics and cosmetic-toys. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 84-88.
6. Jensen C S, Lisby S, Baadsgaard O, Volund A, Menne T. Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol 2002: 146: 636-642.
7. Fischer T I, Maibach H I. The thin layer rapid use epicutaneous test (TRUE-test), a new patch test method with high accuracy. Br J Dermatol 1985: 112: 63-68.
8. Andersen K E, Liden C, Hansen J, Volund A. Dose-response testing with nickel sulfate using the TRUE test in nickel-sensitive individuals. Multiple nickel sulfate patch-test reactions do not cause an 'angry back'. Br J Dermatol 1993:129:50-56.
9. Mortz C G, Lauritsen J M, Bindslev-Jensen C, Andersen K E. Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in adolescents: prevalence measures and associations. The Odense Adolescence Cohort Study on Atopic Diseases and Dermatitis (TOACS). Acta Derm Venereol 2002: 82: 352-358.
10. Wahlberg J E. Patch testing. In: Textbook of Contact Dermatitis, Rycroft R J G, Menne T, Frosch P J (eds): Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 2001: 435-468.
11. Hanifin J M, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1980: 92: 44-47.
12. Manzini B M, Ferdani G, Simonetti V, Donini M, Seidenari S. Contact sensitization in children. Pediatr Dermatol 1998: 15: 12-17.
13. Stables G I, Forsyth A, Lever R S. Patch testing in children. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 341-344.
14. Rudzki E, Rebandel P. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 66-67.
15. Wantke F, Hemmer W, Jarisch R, Gotz M. Patch test reactions in children, adults and the elderly. A comparative study in patients with suspected allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 316-319.
16. Sevila A, Romaguera C, Vilaplana J, Botella R. Contact dermatitis in children. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 30: 292-294.
17. Pevny I, Brennenstuhl M, Razinskas G. Patch testing in children (II). Results and case reports. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 302-310.
18. Fisher A A. Allergic contact dermatitis in early infancy. Cutis 1994: 54: 300-302.
19. Seidenari S, Manzini B M, Motolese A. Contact sensitization in infants: report of 3 cases. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 27: 319-320.
20. Marcussen P V. Primary irritant patch-test reactions in children. Arch Dermatol 1963: 87: 378-382.
21. Hjorth N. Contact dermatitis in children. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1981: 95: 36-39.
22. Pevny I, Brennenstuhl M, Razinskas G. Patch testing in children. (I) Collective test results; skin testability in children. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 201-206.
23. Camarasa J M, Aspiolea F, Alomar A. Patch tests to metals in childhood. Contact Dermatitis 1983: 9: 157-158.
24. Devos S A, Van Der Valk P G. Epicutaneous patch testing. Eur J Dermatol 2002: 12: 506-513.
25. Cronin E. Contact Dermatitis. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1980.
26. Wohrl S, Hemmer W, Focke M, Gotz M, Jarisch R. Patch testing in children, adults, and the elderly: influence of age and sex on sensitization patterns. Pediatr Dermatol 2003: 20: 119-123.
27. Roul S, Ducombs G, Taieb A. Usefulness of the European standard series for patch testing in children. A 3-year single-centre study of 337 patients. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 40: 232-235.
28. Dotterud L K, Falk E S. Contact allergy in relation to hand eczema and atopic diseases in north Norwegian schoolchildren. Acta Paediatr 1995: 84: 402-406.
29. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Geier J, Schnuch A. Risk factors for contact allergy to nickel - results of a multifactorial analysis. Contact Dermatitis 2003: 48: 33-38.
30. Rees J L, Friedmann P S, Matthews J N. Sex differences in susceptibility to development of contact hypersensitivity to dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB). Br J Dermatol 1989: 120: 371-374.
31. Magnusson B, Moller H. Contact allergy without skin disease. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 1979: 59: 113-115.
32. Rohold A E, Halkier-Sorensen L, Andersen K E, Thestrup-Pedersen K. Nickel patch test reactivity and the menstrual cycle. Acta Derm Venereol 1994: 74: 383-385.
33. Hindsen M, Bruze M, Christensen O B. Individual variation in nickel patch test reactivity. Am J Contact Dermat 1999: 10: 62-67.
34. Michel M, L'Heureux N, Auger F A, Germain L. From newborn to adult: phenotypic and functional properties of skin equivalent and human skin as a function of donor age. J Cell Physiol 1997: 171: 179-189.
35. Hoeger P H, Enzmann C C. Skin physiology of the neonate and young infant: a prospective study of functional skin parameters during early infancy. Pediatr Dermatol 2002: 19:256-262.
36. Willis C M. Variability in responsiveness to irritants: thoughts on possible underlying mechanisms. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 47: 267-271.
37. Artik S, von Vultee C, Gleichmann E, Schwarz T, Griem P. Nickel allergy in mice: enhanced sensitization capacity of nickel at higher oxidation states. J Immunol 1999: 163: 1143-1152.
38. Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Cristaudo A, Picardo M. Interactions of sulfates of divalent metals in nickel-sulfatesensitive patients. Exp Dermatol 1996: 5: 79-83.
39. Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Cristaudo A, Picardo M. Nickel chloride/chlorides of divalent metal interactions in nickel-sensitive subjects. Exp Dermatol 1996: 5: 254-259.
40. Santucci B, Cannistraci C, Cristaudo A, Picardo M. Multiple sensitivities to transition metals: the nickel palladium reactions. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 35: 283-286.
41. Budinger L, Hertl M. Immunologic mechanisms in hypersensitivity reactions to metal ions: an overview. Allergy 2000: 55: 108-115.
42. Silverberg N B, Licht J, Friedler S, Sethi S, Laude T A. Nickel contact hypersensitivity in children. Pediatr Dermatol 2002: 19: 110-113.
43. Kohl L, Blondeel A, Song M. Allergic contact dermatitis from cosmetics. Retrospective analysis of 819 patch-tested patients. Dermatology 2002: 204: 334-337.
44. Johansen J, Menne T, Christophersen J, Kaaber K, Veien N. Changes in the pattern of sensitization to common contact allergens in Denmark between 1985-86 and 1997-98: with a special view to the effect of preventive strategies. Br J Dermatol 2000:142:490-495.