Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland

Biological Conservation

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 271-283

  Penttilä, Reijo ^a,c   Siitonen, Juha ^b   Kuusinen, Mikko ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^d Ministry of the Environment Finland   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Dead wood; Forest management; Stand structure; Threatened species; Wood decaying fungi

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FOREST; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DEAD WOOD; FUNGUS; OLD-GROWTH FOREST; SILVICULTURE; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

ABIES; FUNGI; PICEA; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 1642349612     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ahti T., Hämet-Ahti L., Jalas J. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici. 5:1968;169-211.
2. Andersson L., Hytteborn H. Bryophytes and decaying wood - a comparison between managed and natural forest. Holarctic Ecology. 14:1991;121-130.
3. Andrén H., Delin A., Seiler A. Population response to landscape changes depends on specialization to different landscape elements. Oikos. 80(1):1997;193-196.
4. Anon Metsien suojelun tarve Etelä-Suomessa ja Pohjanmaalla. Summary: Forest protection in southern Finland and Ostrobothnia. Suomen Ympäristö 437:2000;1-284.
5. Anon. Finnish statistical yearbook of forestry. 2000;Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki.
6. Anon. Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset. 2001;Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapio, Helsinki.
7. Bader P., Jansson S., Jonsson B.G. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substratum decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biological Conservation. 72:1995;355-362.
8. Berg Å, Ehnström B., Gustafsson L., Hallingbäck T., Jonsell M., Weslien J. Threatened plant, animal and fungi species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conservation Biology. 8:1994;718-731.
9. Bredesen B., Haugan R., Aanderaa R., Lindblad I., Økland B., Røsok Ø Vedlevende sopp som indikatorarter på kontinuitet i østnorske granskoger. Summary: Wood-inhabiting fungi as indicators on ecological continuity within spruce forests of southeastern Norway. Blyttia. 54:1997;131-140.
10. Cajander A.K. Forest types and their significance. Acta Forestalia Fennica. 56:1949;1-71.
11. Curtis R.O. The role of extended rotations. Kohm K., Franklin J.F. Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century. 1997;165-170 Island Press, Washington, DC.
12. Esseen P.A., Ehnström B., Ericsson L., Sjöberg K. Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins. 46:1997;16-47.
13. Fahrig L. How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation. 100:2001;65-74.
14. Fahrig L., Merriam G. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conservation Biology. 8:1994;50-59.
15. Franklin J.F., Rae Berg D., Thornburgh D.A., Tappeiner J.C. Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. Kohm K., Franklin J.F. Creating a Forestry for the 21st Century. 1997;111-139 Island Press, Washington, DC.
16. Gustafsson L., Hallingbäck T. Bryophyte flora and vegetation of managed and virgin coniferous forests in south-west Sweden. Biological Conservation. 44:1988;283-300.
17. Hänninen H. Luontokohteet ja säästöpuusto talousmetsien hakkuissa- seurantatulokset vuosilta 1996-99. Metsä ntutkimuslaitoksen Tiedonantoja. 812:2001;81-95.
18. Hanski I. Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests. modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation Annales Zoologici Fennici. 37:2000;271-280.
19. Holm S. A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 6:1979;65-70.
20. Jonsell M., Weslien J., Ehnström B. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation. 7:1998;749-764.
21. Jonsson B.-G. Patterns of availability of coarse woody debris in a a boreal old-growth Picea abies forest. Journal of Vegetation Science. 11:2000;51-56.
22. Jonsson B.-G., Jonsell M. Exploring potential biodiversity indicators in boreal forests. Biodiversity and Conservation. 8:1999;1417-1433.
23. Karström M. Steget före en presentation. Summary: The project one step ahead a presentation. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 86:1992;103-114.
24. Kotiranta H., Niemelä T. Uhanalaiset käävät Suomessa. Summary: Threatened Polypores in Finland. 2nd revised edition. 1996;Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.
25. Kruys N., Jonsson B.G. Fine woody debris is important for species richness on logs in managed boreal spruce forests of northern Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 29:1999;1295-1299.
26. Kruys N., Fries C., Jonsson B.G., Lämås T., Ståhl G. Wood-inhabiting cryptogams on dead Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees in managed Swedish boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 29:1999;178-186.
27. Kuusinen M. Cyanobacterial macrolichens on Populus tremula as indicators of forest continuity in Finland. Biological Conservation. 75:1995;43-49.
28. Kuusinen M., Siitonen J. Epiphytic lichen diversity in old-growth and managed Picea abies stands in southern Finland. Journal of Vegetation Science. 9:1998;283-292.
29. Lindblad I. Wood-inhabiting fungi on fallen logs of Norway spruce. relations to forest management and substrate quality Nordic Journal of Botany. 18:1998;243-255.
30. Lloyd S. The last of the last: the old-growth forests of boreal Europe. 1999;Taiga Rescue Network, International Coordination Centre, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
31. Martikainen P., Siitonen J., Kaila L., Punttila P., Rauh J. Bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) and associated beetle species in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management. 116:1999;233-245.
32. Martikainen P., Siitonen J., Punttila P., Kaila L., Rauh J. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation. 94:2000;199-209.
33. Minchin P.R. DECODA user's manual. 1989;Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
34. Mönkkönen M., Reunanen P. On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity. a management perspective Oikos. 84(2):1999;302-305.
35. Niemelä T. Suomen Kääpien Määritysopas. Summary: Guide to the Polypores of Finland. 2001;Botanical Bulletins, University of Helsinki. 179, 1-142.
36. Nordstedt G., Bader P., Ericson L. Polypores as indicators of conservation value in Corsican pine forests. Biological Conservation. 99:2001;347-354.
37. Ohlson M., Söderström L., Hörnberg L., Zacrisson O., Hermansson J. Habitat qualities versus long-term continuity as determinants of biodiversity in boreal old-growth swamp forests. Biological Conservation. 81:1997;221-231.
38. Økland B. Unlogged forests: important sites for preserving the diversity of Mycetophilids (Diptera: Sciaroidea). Biological Conservation. 76:1996;297-310.
39. Økland B., Bakke A., Hagvar S., Kvamme T. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multi-scaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiversity and Conservation. 5:1996;75-100.
40. Rassi P., Alanen A., Kanerva T., Mannerkoski I. Suomen lajien uhanalaisuus 2000. [The 2000 Red List of Finnish Species]. 2001;Ministry of the Environment & Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.
41. Rayner A.D.M., Todd N.K. Intraspecific antagonism in natural populations of wood-decaying basidiomycetes. Journal of General Microbiology. 103:1977;85-90.
42. Rayner A.D.M., Todd N.K. Population and community structure and dynamics of fungi in decaying wood. Advances in Botanical Research. 7:1979;333-420.
43. Seymour R., Hunter M.L. Jr. Principles of ecological forestry. Hunter M.L. Jr. Maintaining Biodiversity in Forest Ecosystems. 1999;22-61 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. Siitonen J. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms. Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example Ecological Bulletins. 49:2001;11-41.
45. Siitonen J., Martikainen P. Occurrence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Populus tremula. a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 9:1994;185-191.
46. Siitonen J., Saaristo L. Habitat requirements of a threatened boreal old-growth species, Pytho kolwensis Sahlberg (Coleoptera, Pythidae), in Finland. Biological Conservation. 94:2000;211-220.
47. Siitonen J., Martikainen P., Punttila P., Rauh J. Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management. 128:2000;211-225.
48. Sippola A.-L., Renvall P. Wood-decomposing fungi and seed-tree cutting. A 40-year perspective Forest Ecology and Management. 115:1999;183-201.
49. Sippola A.-L., Lehesvirta T., Renvall P. Effects of selective logging on coarse woody debris and diversity of wood-decaying polypores in eastern Finland. Ecological Bulletins. 49:2001;243-254.
50. Stokland J. The coarse woody debris profile. an archive of the recent forest history and an important biodiversity indicator Ecological Bulletins. 49:2001;71-83.
51. Tonteri T., Siitonen J. Lahopuu talousmetsissä valtakunnan metsien 9. inventoinnin tulosten mukaan - vertailu luonnonmetsiin. Metsä ntutkimuslaitoksen Tiedonantoja. 812:2001;57-72.
52. Virkkala R., Korhonen K.T., Haapanen R., Aapala K. Metsien ja soiden suojelutilanne metsä- ja suokasvillisuusvyöhykkeittäin valtakunnan metsien 8. inventoinnin perusteella. Summary: Protected forests and mires in forest and mire vegetation zones in Finland based on the 8th National Forest Inventory. Suomen Ympäristö 39:2000;1-52.
53. With K.A., King A.W. Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. Conservation Biology. 13:1999;314-326.
54. Woodward S., Stenlid J., Karjalainen R., Hüttermann A. Heterobasidion Annosum: Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control. 1998;CAB International, Oxon.