Are woodland key habitats in Finland hotspots for polypores (Basidiomycota)?

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 32-40

  Junninen, Kaisa ^a   Kouki, Jari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Boreal forest; Fennoscandia; Forest conservation; Species richness; Threatened species; Wood decaying fungi

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; FUNGI; POROUS MATERIALS;

BOREAL FOREST; THREATENED SPECIES; WOOD-DECAYING FUNGI;

WOOD PRODUCTS;

BIODIVERSITY; FUNGI; POROUS MATERIALS; SCANDINAVIA; WOOD PRODUCTS;

BASIDIOMYCOTA; FUNGI;

EID: 32844459513     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580500530009     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aasaaren, O. & Sverdrup-Thygeson, A. (1994). Nøkkelbiotoper i skogen [Woodland key habitats]. Oslo: Norskog. (In Norwegian.)
2. Ahti, T., Hämet-Ahti, L. & Jalas, J. (1968). Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Annales Botanici Fennici, 5, 167-211.
3. Anon (2003). Finnish statistical yearbook of forestry. Vantaa: Finnish Forest Research Institute.
4. Bendiksen, E., Høiland, K., Brandrud, T. E. & Jordal, J. B. (1997). Truede Og sårbare sopparter i Norge - En kommentert rødliste [Threatened fungi in Norway - The red list]. Oslo: Fungiflora. (In Norwegian.)
5. Berg, A., Gardenfors, U., Hallingback, T. & Noren, M. (2002). Habitat preferences of red-listed fungi and bryophytes in woodland key habitats in southern Sweden - analyses of data from a national survey. Biodiversity and Conservation, 11, 1479-1503.
6. Berglund, H. & Jonsson, B. G. (2005). Verifying an extinction dept among lichens and fungi in northern Swedish boreal forests. Conservation Biology, 19, 338-348.
7. Colwell, R. K. (2005). EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples (Version 7.5). User's guide and application published at purl.oclc.org/estimates
8. Ericsson, T. S., Berglund, H. & Östlund, L. (2005). History and forest biodiversity of woodland key habitats in south boreal Sweden. Biological Conservation, 122, 289-303.
9. Gärdenfors, U. (Ed.). (2000). Rödlistade arter i Sverige - The 2000 red list of Swedish species. ArtDatabanken, SLU.
10. Gjerde, I., Saetersdal, M., Rolstad, J., Blom, H. H. & Storaunet, K. O. (2004). Fine-scale diversity and rarity hotspots in northern forests. Conservation Biology, 18, 1032-1042.
11. Gotelli, N. J. & Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4, 379-391.
12. Gustafsson, L. (2000). Red-listed species and indicators: Vascular plants in woodland key habitats and surrounding production forests in Sweden. Biological Conservation, 92, 35-43.
13. Gustafsson, L. (2002). Presence and abundance of red-listed plant species in Swedish forests. Conservation Biology, 16, 377-388.
14. Gustafsson, L., De Jong, J. & Noren, M. (1999). Evaluation of Swedish woodland key habitats using red-listed bryophytes and lichens. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 1101-1114.
15. Gustafsson, L., Hylander, K. & Jacobson, C. (2004). Uncommon bryophytes in Swedish forests - Key habitats and production forests compared. Forest Ecology and Management, 194, 11-22.
16. Heikkala, J. (2003). Lahopuun määrän ja laadun vaikutus kääpälajistoihin valtion vanhoissa talousmetsissä Pohjois-Karjalassa [The effects of the amount and quality of dead wood on polypore assemblages in old state-owned production forests in North Karelia]. Master's thesis, Faculty of Forest Sciences, University of Joensuu. (In Finnish.)
17. Heinonen, J. (1994). Koealojen puu- ja puustotunnusten laskentaohjelma KPL. Käyttöohje [KPL calculation software for plot-based tree measurements. Manual]. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 504, 1-80.
18. Johansson, P. & Gustafsson, L. (2001). Red-listed and indicator lichens in woodland key habitats and production forests in Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 1617-1628.
19. Jonsson, B. G. & Jonsell, M. (1999). Exploring potential biodiversity indicators in boreal forests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 1417-1433.
20. Kati, V., Devillers, P., Dufrene, M., Legakis, A., Vokou, D. & Lebrun, P. (2003). Testing the value of six taxonomic groups as biodiversity indicators at a local scale. Conservation Biology, 18, 667-675.
21. Komonen, A. (2003). Hotspots of insect diversity in boreal forests. Conservation Biology, 17, 976-981.
22. Kotiranta, H. & Niemelä, T. (1996). Threatened polypores in Finland. Finnish Environment Institute, Edita. (In Finnish with English summary.)
23. Laasasenaho, J. (1982). Taper-curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fennine, 108, 1-74.
24. Lindgren, M. (2001). Polypore (Basidiomycetes) species richness and community structure in natural boreal forests of NW Russian Karelia and adjacent areas in Finland. Acta Botanica Fennica, 170, 1-41.
25. McCune, B. & Mefford, M. J. (1999). Multivariate analysis of ecological data (Version 4). Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software Design.
26. Meriluoto, M. & Soininen, T. (1998). Metsäluonnon arvokkaat elinympäristöt [Woodland habitats of special importance]. Metsälehti Kustannus Tapio. (In Finnish).
27. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858.
28. Niemelä, T. (2004). Guide to the polypores of Finland . Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences (Plant Biology), University of Helsinki. (In Finnish with keys in English.)
29. Nitare, J. (2000). Indicator species for assessing the nature conservation value of woodland sites - A flora of selected cryptogams. Jönköping: Skogsstyrelsen. (In Swedish with English summary.)
30. Nitare, J. & Norén, M. (1992). Woodland key habitats of rare and endangered species will be mapped in a new project of the Swedish National Board of Forestry. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, 86, 219-226. (In Swedish with English summary.)
31. Penttilä, R., Siitonen, J. & Kuusinen, M. (2004). Polypore diversity in managed and old-growth boreal Picea abies forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation, 117, 271-283.
32. Prendergast, J., Quinn, R., Lawton, J., Eversham, B. & Gibbons, D. (1993). Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature, 365, 335-337.
33. Pykälä, J. (2004). Effects of new forestry practices on rare epiphytic macrolichens. Conservation Biology, 18, 831-838.
34. Rassi, P., Alanen, A., Kanerva, T. & Mannerkoski, I. (Eds.) (2001). The 2000 red list of Finnish species. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment. (In Finnish with English summary.)
35. Reid, W. V. (1998). Biodiversity hotspots. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 275-280.
36. Sippola, A.-L., Mönkkönen, M., Renvall, P. & Kangasmäki, K. (2004). Avainbiotoopin koon ja puuston rakenteen merkitys Kolin kansallispuiston kääpälajiston suojelulle [The effects of the size and tree structure of key habitats on protection of polypores in Koli National Park]. Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja , 915, 73-90. (In Finnish.)
37. Sverdrup-Thygeson, A. (2002). Key habitats in the Norwegian production forest: A case study. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 166-178.
38. Yrjönen, K. (2004). Metsälain erityisen tärkeät elinympäristöt. Kartoitus yksityismetsissä 1998-2004. Loppuraportti [The habitats of special importance in the Finnish Forest Act. Survey in private forests 1998-2004. Final report]. Helsinki: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (In Finnish.)