Amount and quality of coarse woody debris in natural and managed coniferous forests near the timberline in Finnish Lapland

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1-4, 1998, Pages 204-214

  Sippola, Anna Liisa ^a   Siitonen, Juha ^b   Kallio, Reino ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Coarse woody debris (CWD); Dead trees; Decaying wood; Finland; Timberline forests

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; DEAD TREES; DECAYING WOOD; FINLAND; MANAGED CONIFEROUS FOREST; NATURAL CONIFEROUS FOREST; TIMBERLINE FOREST;

FINLAND; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAPLAND;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS; WOOD;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

EID: 0031835007     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827589809382978     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Andersson, L. I., and Hytteborn, H., 1991. Bryophytes and decaying wood—a comparison between managed and natural forest. Holarctic Ecol., 14:121–130.
2. Anon. 1988. Erämaakomitean mietintö, Komiteanmietintö 1988:39 238Valtion painatuskeskus. (In Finnish.)
3. Anon. 1990. Rikare skog, 133Jönköping:Skogsstyrelsen. (In Swedish.)
4. Anon. 1991. Suomen säädöskokoelma No. 62, Erämaalaki 129–131. Helsinki (In Finnish.)
5. Anon. 1992. Ohje erämaa-alueiden luonnonmukaisesti hoidettavien metsien käsittelystä, 22Metsähallitus. (In Finnish.)
6. Anon. 1993. Metsätalouden ympäristöopas, 112Helsinki:Metsähallitus. (In Finnish.)
7. Anon. 1994a. Naturskogar i Norden, 109Nordisk Ministerrådet. Nord 1994:7. In Swedish with English summary.)
8. Anon. 1994b. Luonnonläheinen metsänhoito, Metsäkeskus Tapion julkaisu 6 72Helsinki (In Finnish.)
9. Anon. 1995a. Diversity for the future. Green balance sheet 1995 for Stora Forest and Timber, 11Falun:Stora Forest and Timber.
10. Anon. 1995b. Metsätalouden ympäristönsuojelun seuranta 1995, Työryhmän loppuraportti 23Metsähallitus. 9.1.1995. (In Finnish.)
11. Anon. 1995c. Luonnon monimuotoisuus yksityismetsissä. MTK:n ohjelma ja suositukset, Maa- ja metsätalous-tuottajain keskusliitto MTK ry, metsäosasto 15Helsinki (In Finnish.)
12. Bader, P., Jansson, S., and Jonsson, B. G., 1995. Wood-inhabiting fungi and substrate decline in selectively logged boreal spruce forests. Biol. Conserv., 72:355–362.
13. Bonan, G. B., and Shugart, H. H., 1989. Environmental factors and ecological processes in boreal forests. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 20:1–28.
14. Esseen, P. A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L., and Sjöberg, K., 1992. “ Boreal forests—The focal habitats of Fennoscandia ”. In Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation, Edited by:Hansson, L., 252–325. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd. ISBN 1–85166–718–0
15. Franklin, J. F., Shugart, H. H., and Harmon, M. E., 1987. Tree death as an ecological process. The causes, consequences, and variability of tree mortality. BioScience, 37:550–556.
16. Hansen, A. J., Spies, T. A., Swarson, F. J., and Ohmann, J. L., 1991. Conserving biodiversity in managed forests. Lessons from natural forests. BioScience, 41:382–392.
17. Harmon, M. E., and Hua, Chen. 1991. Coarse woody debris dynamics in two old—growth ecosystems. Comparing a deciduous forest in China and a conifer forest in Oregon. BioScience, 41:604–610.
18. Harmon, M. E., Franklin, J. F., Swanson, F. J., Sollins, P., Gerhory, S. V., Lattin, J. D., Anderson, N. H., Cline, S. P., Aumen, N. G., Sedell, J. R., Leinkaemper, G. W., Cromack, K., Jr. and Cummins, K. W., 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res., 15:133–302.
19. Havas, P., and Kubin, E., 1983. Structure, growth and organic matter content in the vegetation cover of an old spruce forest in Northern Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn., 20:115–149.
20. Heikinheimo, O., 1915. Der Einfluss der Brandwirtschaft auf die Wälder Finnlands. Acta For. Fenn., 4(2):1–264. 149 of appendices. (In Finnish with German summary.)
21. Heliövaara, K., and Väisänen, R., 1984. Effects of modern forestry on northwestern European forest invertebrates:a synthesis. Acta For. Fenn., 189:1–32.
22. Ilvessalo, Y., 1956. The forests of Finland from 1921–24 to 1951–53. A survey based on three national forest inventories. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn., 47:1–227. (In Finnish with English summary.)
23. Kaila, L., Martikainen, P., and Punttila, P., 1997. Dead trees left in clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodiv. Con-serv., 6:1–18.
24. Kalliola, R., 1966. The reduction of the area of forests in natural condition in Finland in the light of some maps based upon national forest inventories. Ann. Bot. Fenn., 3:442–448.
25. Kauhanen, H., 1989. Inventory of the windthrown area of Jauru Valley in the Urho Kekkonen National Park. Folia For., 736:59–66. (In Finnish with English summary.)
26. Korhonen, P., 1995. Metsäkeskus Tapion luontolaatuselvitys:monimuotoisuus säilyy hyvällä metsänhoidolla. Metsämies, 7:12–13. (In Finnish.)
27. Krankina, O. N., and Harmon, M. E., 1995. Dynamics of dead wood carbon pool in northwestern Russian boreal forests. Water Air Soil Pollut., 82:227–238.
28. Kuuluvainen, T., 1994. Gap disturbance, ground microtopography, and the regeneration daynamics of boreal coniferous forests in Finland:a review. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 31:35–51.
29. Kuusela, K., 1979. Forest resources and ownership in Finland 1971–1976. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn., 93(6):1–107. (In Finnish with English summary.)
30. Laasasenaho, J., 1982. Taper-curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn., 108:74
31. Laasasenaho, J., and Snellman, C. G., 1983. Männyn, kuusen ja koivun tikivuustaulukot, Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja 113 93Helsinki (In Finnish.)
32. Lämås, T., and Fries, C., 1995. “ An integrated forest inventory in a managed North-Swedish forest landscape for estimating growing stock and coarse woody debris ”. In The monte verita conference on forest survey designs, Edited by:Köhl, M., Bachmann, P., Brassel, P., and Preto, G., 296–311. Zürich:Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research & Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
33. Leikola, M., 1969. On the termination of diameter growth of Scots pine in nothernmost Finnish Lapland. Silva Fenn., 3:50–61.
34. Linder, P., 1986. Kirjesålandet, En skogsbiologisk in ventering av ett fjällnära urskogsomräde i Västerbottens län, 108Umeå:Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. (In Swedish.)
35. Linder, P., and Östlund, L., 1992. Changes in the boreal forests of Sweden 1870–1991. Svensk Bot. Tidskr., 86:199–215. (In Swedish with English summary.)
36. Linder, P., Elfving, B., and Zackrisson, O., 1997. Stand structure and successional trends in virgin boreal forest reserves in Sweden. For. Ecol. Manage, (in press)
37. Maser, C., and Trappe, J. M., 1984. The seen and unseen world of the fallen tree, USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, PNW-164 56
38. Mattila, E., 1986. The forest resources of Finnish Lapland by sub-areas. The 7th National Forest Inventory in 1978 and 1982–82. Folia For., 661:77 (In Finnish with English summary.)
39. Nuorteva, M., 1956. Hakkuiden vaikutuksesta kaarnakuoriaisten esiintymiseen eräällä metsäalueella EteläHämeessä. Acta For. Fenn., 63:1–38. (In Finnish with German summary.)
40. Økland, B., Bakke, A., Hågvar, S., and Kvamme, T., 1996. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiv. Conserv., 5:75–100.
41. Pickett, S. T., and White, P. S., eds. 1985. The Ecology of Natural disturbance and Patch dynamics, 472Academic Press.
42. Rassi, P., Alanen, A., Kemppainen, E., Vickholm, M., and Väisänen, R., eds. 1985. Uhanalaisten eläinten ja kasvien suojelutoimikunnan mietintö. I Yleinen osa, Komiteanmietintö 1985:43 111Helsinki:Ympäristöministe-riö. (In Finnish.)
43. Rassi, P., Kaipiainen, H., Mannerkoski, I., and Ståhls, G., eds. 1992. Uhanalaisten eläinten ja kasvien seurantatoimikunnan mietintö, Komiteanmietintö 1991:30 323Helsinki:Ympäristöministeriö. (In Finnish.)
44. Renvall, P., 1995. Community structure and dynamics of wood-rotting Basidiomycetes on decomposing conifer trunks in northern Finland. Karstenia, 35:1–51.
45. Rutanen, I., 1994. Beetles of the old forests in South-Finland I, Vesi- ja ympäristöhallinnon julkaisuja, sarja A, 175 80Helsinki (In Finnish with English summary.)
46. Saarenmaa, H., 1989. Damage by animals in the forests of Lapland. In Saastamoinen. O. & Varmola, M. (eds.) Lapin metsäkirja. Acta Lapp. Fenn., 15:125–134. (In Finnish with English summary.)
47. Samuelsson, J., Gustafsson, L., and Ingelög, T., 1994. Dying and Dead Trees—a Review of their Importance for Biodiversity, 109Uppsala:Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Report 4306
48. Siitonen, J., 1994. Decaying wood and saproxylic Coleoptera in two old spruce forests:a comparison based on two sampling methods. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 31:8995
49. Sirén, G., 1955. The development of spruce forest on raw humus sites in northern Finland and its ecology. Acta For. Fenn., 62:1–408. (In Finnish with English summary.)
50. Spies, T. A., Franklin, J. F., and Thomas, T. B., 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology, 69:1689–1702.
51. Syrjänen, K., Kalliola, R., Puolasmaa, A., and Mattson, J., 1994. Landscape structure and forest dynamics in subcontinental Russian European taiga. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 31:19–34.
52. Väisänen, R., Biström, O., and Heliövaara, K., 1993. Sub-cortical Coleoptera in dead pines and spruces:is primeval species composition maintained in managed forests?. Biodiv. Conserv., 2:95–113.