Facilitating identity formation, group membership, and learning in science classrooms: What can be learned from out-of-field teaching in an urban school?

Science Education

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 201-221

  Olitsky, Stacy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947585526     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20182     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Barton, A. C. (1998). Feminist science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Barton, A. C., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871-889.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
4. Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 421-458.
5. Brown, B. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810-834.
6. Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Durkheim, É. (1912/1965). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.
8. Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Analyzing casual conversation. London: Cassell Academic.
9. Elmesky, R. (2001). Struggles of agency and structure as cultural worlds collide as urban African American youth learn physics. Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State University.
10. Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
12. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Random House.
13. Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Helms, J. V. (1998). Science and me: Subject matter and identity in secondary school science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 811-834.
15. Ingersoll, R. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37.
16. Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 542-557). New York: MacMillan.
17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
19. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. Reveles, J. M., Cordova, R., & Kelly, G. J. (2004). Science literacy and academic identity formulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1111-1144.
21. Rodriguez, A. J. (1997). The dangerous discourse of invisibility: A critique of the National Research Council's National Science Education Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 19-37.
22. Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. (2004). Co-generative dialoguing and metaloguing: Reflexivity of process and genres. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(3). Retrieved March 2005 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/3-04/04-3-7-e.htm
23. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., Carambo, C., McKnight, Y., & Beers, J. (2004). Re/making identities in the praxis of urban schooling: A cultural historical perspective [Special issue on Activity Theory and Educational Change]. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 11(1), 48-69.
24. Seiler, G. (2002). A critical look at teaching, learning, and learning to teach science in an inner city, neighborhood high school. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
25. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
26. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Tobin, K., Seiler, G., & Walls, E. (1999). Reproduction of social class in the teaching and learning of science in urban high schools. Research in Science Education, 29(2), 171-187.
28. Weber, M. (1922). Economy and society. New York: Bedminster.
29. Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7, 225-246.
30. Wiley, N. (1994). The semiotic self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Wortham, S. (1996). Deictic mapping. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 331-348.