On the causes of compensation for coarticulation: Evidence for phonological mediation

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1227-1240

  Mitterer, Holger ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947539149     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193723     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. AKKER, E., & CUTLER, A. (2003). Prosodic cues to semantic structure in native and nonnative listening. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 6, 81-96.
2. BEDDOR, P. S., HARNSBERGER, J. D., & LINDEMANN, S. (2002). Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: Acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 591-627.
3. BEDDOR, P. S., & KRAKOW, R. A. (1999). Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: Evidence for partial compensation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2868-2887.
4. BEST, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 167-200). Baltimore, MD: York Press.
5. BLOMERT, L., MITTERER, H., & PAFFEN, C. (2004). In search of the auditory, phonetic and/or phonological problems in dyslexia: Context effects in speech perception. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 47, 1030-1047.
6. BOERSMA, P., & WEENINK, D. (2004). Praat 4.0. [Computer software]. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Institute of Phonetic Sciences.
7. BOOIJ, G. (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
8. BREGMAN, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. COADY, J. A., KLUENDER, K. R., & RHODE, W. S. (2003). Effects of contrast between onsets of speech and other complex spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 2225-2235.
10. DARCY, I., PEPERKAMP, S., & DUPOUX, E. (in press). Bilinguals play by the rules: Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners. In J. Cole & J. Hualde (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 9: Change in phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. DIEHL, R., LOTTO, A. J., & HOLT, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149-179.
12. FARNETANI, E. (1997). Coarticulation and connected speech processes. In W. J. Hardcastle & J. Laver (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 371-404). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. FLORENTINE, M., BUUS, S., & POULSEN, T. (1996). Temporal integration of loudness as a function of level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1633-1644.
14. FOWLER, C. A. (1990). Sound-producing sources as objects of perception: Rate normalization and nonspeech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2905-2909.
15. FOWLER, C. A. (1992). Vowel duration and closure duration in voiced and unvoiced stops: There are no contrast effects here. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 143-165.
16. FOWLER, C. A. (1996). Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99, 1730-1741.
17. FOWLER, C. A. (2006). Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 161-177.
18. FOWLER, C. A., & BROWN, J. M. (2000). Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 21-32.
19. FOWLER, C. A., BROWN, J. M., & MANN, V. A. (2000). Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 877-888.
20. FOWLER, C. A., & DEKLE, D. J. (1991). Listening with eye and hand: Cross-modal contributions to speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 816-828.
21. FOWLER, C. A., & SMITH, M. R. (1986). Speech perception as "vector analysis": An approach to the problems of invariance and segmentation. In J. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 123-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. GASKELL, M. G. (2003). Modelling regressive and progressive effects of assimilation in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 447-463.
23. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. HOCKETT, C. F. (1955). A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly.
25. HOLT, L. L. (2005). Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychological Science, 16, 305-312.
26. HOLT, L. L., & LOTTO, A. J. (2002). Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects. Hearing Research, 167, 156-169.
27. HOLT, L. L., LOTTO, A. J., & KLUENDER, K. R. (2000). Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 710-722.
28. HOLT, L. L., LOTTO, A. J., & KLUENDER, K. R. (2001). Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: A case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 764-774.
29. HOLT, L. L., STEPHENS, J. D. W., & LOTTO, A. J. (2005). A critical evaluation of visually moderated phonetic context effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1102-1112.
30. JOHNSON, K., STRAND, E. A., & D'IMPERIO, M. (1999). Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 359-384.
31. KLUENDER, K. R., COADY, J. A., & KIEFTE, M. (2001). Sensitivity to change in perception of speech. Speech Communication, 41, 59-69.
32. LADEFOGED, P., & BROADBENT, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 98-104.
33. LIBERMAN, A. M. (1996). Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. LIBERMAN, A. M., DELATTRE, P. C., & COOPER, F. S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus variables in the perception of unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 497-516.
35. LIBERMAN, A. M., & WHALEN, D. W. (2000). On the relation of speech to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 187-196.
36. LINDBLOM, B. E., & STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. (1967). On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 42, 830-843.
37. LOTTO, A. J., & KLUENDER, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 602-619.
38. LOTTO, A. J., KLUENDER, K. R., & HOLT, L. L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 1134-1140.
39. LOTTO, A. J., SULLIVAN, S. C., & HOLT, L. L. (2003). Central locus for nonspeech context effects on phonetic identification (L). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 53-56.
40. MANN, V. A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 407-412.
41. MANN, V. A. (1986). Distinguishing universal and language-dependent levels of speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners' perception of English "l" and "r." Cognition, 24, 169-196.
42. MANN, V. A., & REPP, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [sh]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 213-228.
43. MANN, V. A., & REPP, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop-consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 548-558.
44. MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
45. MITTERER, H., & BLOMERT, L. (2003). Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 956-969.
46. MITTERER, H., CSÉPE, V., & BLOMERT, L. (2006). The role of perceptual integration in the recognition of assimilated words forms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1305-1334.
47. MITTERER, H., CSÉPE, V., HONBOLYGO, F., & BLOMERT, L. (2006). The recognition of phonologically assimilated words does not depend on specific language experience. Cognitive Science, 30, 451-479.
48. MITTERER, H., & ERNESTUS, M. (2006). Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 73-103.
49. NEAREY, T. D. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2088-2113.
50. REMEZ, R. E., RUBIN, P. E., BERNS, S. M., PARDO, J. S., & LANG, J. M. (1994). On the perceptual organization of speech. Psychological Review, 101, 129-156.
51. SCOTT, S. K., & WISE, R. J. S. (2004). The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception. Cognition, 92, 13-45.
52. SINNOTT, J. M., & SAPORITA, T. A. (2000). Differences in American English, Spanish, and monkey perception of the say-stay trading relation. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1312-1319.
53. SMITS, R. (2001a). Evidence for hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1145-1162.
54. SMITS, R. (2001b). Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1109-1139.
55. VROOMEN, J. (1992). Hearing voices and seeing lips: Investigations in the psychology of lipreading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University.
56. VROOMEN, J., & DE GELDER, B. (2001). Lipreading and the compensation for coarticulation mechanism. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16, 661-672.
57. WARREN, R. M. (1999). Auditory perception: A new analysis and synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. WEBER, A., & CUTLER, A. (2004). Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 50, 1-25.
59. WHALEN, D. H. (1990). Coarticulation is largely planned. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 3-35.
60. YABE, H., TERVANIEMI, M., SINKKONEN, J., HUOTILAINEN, M., ILMONIEMI, R. J., & NÄÄ TÄNEN, R. (1998). Temporal window of integration of auditory information in the human brain. Psychophysiology, 35, 615-619.