Evidence for hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 1145-1162

  Smits, Roel ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RANDOMIZATION; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 85047686245     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.5.1145     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abel, S. M. (1972). Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51, 1219-1223.
2. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
3. Batchelder, W. H., & Crowther, C. S. (1997). Multinomial processing tree models of factorial categorization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 45-55.
4. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1999). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer [On-line manual]. Retrieved from: http://www.fon.hum. uva.nl/praat/.
5. Booij, G. (1995). The phonology of Dutch. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
6. Collins, B., & Mees, I. (1981). The sounds of English and Dutch. The Hague, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press.
7. Diehl, R. L., & Kluender, K. R. (1987). On the categorization of speech sounds. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception (pp. 226-253). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Fowler, C. A. (1984). Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 359-368.
9. Fukunaga, K. (1990). Introduction to statistical pattern recognition. New York: Academic Press.
10. Glasberg, B. R., & Moore, B. C. J. (1990). Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research, 47, 103-138.
11. Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099-3111.
12. Mann, V. A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 407-412.
13. Mann, V. A., & Repp, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 213-228.
14. Massaro, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983). Phonological contact in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 338-348.
16. Massaro, D. W., & Oden, G. C. (1980). Evaluation and integration of acoustic features in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 996-1013.
17. McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear modeling. London: Chapman & Hall.
18. Mermelstein, P. (1978). On the relationship between vowel and consonant identification when cued by the same acoustic information. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 331-336.
19. Nearey, T. M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 347-373.
20. Nearey, T. M. (1997). Speech perception as pattern recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 3241-3254.
21. Nearey, T. M. (in press). On the factorability of phonological units in speech perception. In Papers in laboratory phonology VI. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Nearey, T. M., & Hogan, J. T. (1986). Phonological contrast in experimental phonetics: Relating distributions of production data to perceptual categorization curves. In J. J. Ohala & J. J. Jaeger (Eds.), Experimental phonology (pp. 141-161). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
23. Parducci, A. (1965). Category judgment: A range-frequency model. Psychological Review, 72, 407-418.
24. Pols, L. C. W., Tromp, H. R. C., & Plomp, R. (1973). Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels for 50 male speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 1093-1101.
25. Repp, B. H., & Liberman, A. M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception (pp. 89-112). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Rosen, S. M. (1979). Range and frequency effects in consonant categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 393-402.
27. Schatz, C. D. (1954). The role of context in the perception of stops. Language, 30, 47-56.
28. Scheffers, M. T. M. (1983). Sifting vowels. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Groningen University, the Netherlands.
29. Smits, R. (1997). A pattern-recognition-based framework for research on phonetic perception. In Speech hearing and language, work in progress 9 (pp. 195-229). London: Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London.
30. Smits, R. (in press). Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysis. Perception & Psychophysics.
31. Stevens, K. N. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Sussman, H. M., Fruchter, D., Hubert, J., & Sirosh, J. (1998). Linear correlates in the speech signal: The orderly output constraint. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 241-299.
33. Whalen, D. H. (1981). Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[∫] boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 275-282.
34. Whalen, D. H. (1989). Vowel and consonant judgments are not independent when cued by the same information. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 284-292.
35. Whalen, D. H. (1992). Perception of overlapping segments: Thoughts on Nearey's model. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 493-496.