A critical evaluation of visually moderated phonetic context effects

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1102-1112

  Holt, Lori L ^a   Stephens, Joseph D W ^a   Lotto, Andrew J ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28844451838     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193635     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. COLIN, C., & RADEAU, M. (2003). The McGurk illusions in speech: 25 years of research. L'Année Psychologique, 103, 497-542.
2. ELMAN, J. L., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1988). Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 143-165.
3. FOWLER, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 3-28.
4. FOWLER, C. A., BROWN, J. M., & MANN, V. A. (2000). Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 877-888.
5. GREEN, K. P., & NORRIX, L. W. (2001). Perception of M and /r/ in /l/ stop cluster: Evidence of cross-modal context effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 166-177.
6. KLATT, D. H. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67, 971-990.
7. LIBERMAN, A. M., & MATTINGLY, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
8. LOTTO, A. J., & KLUENDER, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 602-619.
9. MAGNUSON, J. S., MCMURRAY, B., TANENHAUS, M. K., & ASLIN, R. N. (2003). Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: The ghost of Christmash past. Cognitive Science, 27, 285-298.
10. MANN, V. A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 407-412.
11. MANN, V. A., & REPP, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 548-558.
12. MASSARO, D. W. (1987). Speech perception by ear and eye: A paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. MASSARO, D. W. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
15. MCGURK, H., & MACDONALD, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746-748.
16. MILLER, J. L. (1990). Speech perception. In D. N. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 69-93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. MUNHALL, K. G., GRIBBLE, P., SACCO, L., & WARD, M. (1996). Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 351-362.
18. PITT, M. A., & MCQUEEN, J. M. (1998). Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 347-370.
19. SAMUEL, A. G., & PITT, M. A. (2003). Lexical activation (and other factors) can mediate compensation for coarticulation. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 416-434.
20. VROOMEN, J. (1992). Hearing voices and seeing lips: Investigations in the psychology of lipreading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tilburg University.
21. VROOMEN, J., & DE GELDER, B. (2001). Lipreading and the compensation for coarticulation mechanism. Language & Cognitive Processes, 16, 661-672.