Navigated control in functional endoscopic sinus surgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 31-41

  Strauss, G ^a   Koulechov, K ^b   Richter, R ^a   Dietz, A ^a   Trantakis, C ^a   Luth T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

FESS; mechatronics; navigated control; shaver; sinus surgery

Indexed keywords

COPYRIGHTS; DIGITAL STORAGE; SURGERY;

CT DATA; ENT SURGERY; FESS; FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; NAVIGATED CONTROL; PARANASAL SINUS; SHAVER; SINUS SURGERY; STUDY DESIGN; WORKING SPACE;

NAVIGATION;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ELECTRONICS; ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; PARANASAL SINUS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ELECTRONICS, MEDICAL; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; PARANASAL SINUSES; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; ROBOTICS; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS;

EID: 33947385200     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.25     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Mosges R, Schlondorff G. A new imaging method for intraoperative therapy control in skull-base surgery. Neurosurg Rev. 1988:245–7.
2. Schlondorff G, Mosges R, Meyer-Ebrecht D, Krybus W, Adams L. CAS (computer assisted surgery). Ein neuartiges Verfahren in der Kopf- und Halschirurgie. HNO. 1989:187–90.
3. Klimek L, Mosges R, Schlondorff G, Mann W. Development of computer-aided surgery for otorhinolaryngology. Comput Aided Surg. 1998:194–201. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1998)3:4<194::AIDIGS10>3.0. CO;2-R
4. Grevers G, Leunig A, Klemens A, Hagedorn H. Computerassistierte Chirurgie der Nasennebenhohlen--Technologie und klinische Erfahrungen mit dem Vector- Vision-Compact-System an 102 Patienten. Laryngorhinootologie. 2002:476–83. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33291
5. Troitzsch D, Hoffmann J, Dammann F, Bartz D, Reinert S. Registrierung mit dreidimensionaler Oberflachen- Laserscanner-Technik zur Navigation in der Mund-, Kieferund Gesichtschirurgie. Zentralbl Chir. 2003:551–6.
6. Fei B, Zhuang T. The method and development of computerassisted surgery. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. [Article in Chinese] 1998 Jun;15(2): 195–202.
7. Koele W, Stammberger H, Lackner A, Reittner P. Image guided surgery of paranasal sinuses and anterior skull basefive years experience with the InstaTrak-System. Rhinology. 2002:1–9.
8. Sedlmaier B, Schleich A, Ohnesorge B, Jovanovic S. Das NEN-HNO-Navigationssystem. Erste klinische Anwendung. HNO. 2001:523–9. doi: 10.1007/s001060170076
9. Caversaccio M, Nolte L, Hausler R. Present state and future perspectives of computer aided surgery in the field of ENT and skull base. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2002:51–9.
10. Zheng B, Janmohamed Z, MacKenzie CL. Reaction times and the decision-making process in endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003:1475–80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8759-0
11. Erfanian K, Luks FI, Kurkchubasche AG, Wesselhoeft CWJ, Tracy TFJ. In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2003:1059–62. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00192-1
12. Patil PV, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A. Effect of the angle between the optical axis of the endoscope and the instruments' plane on monitor image and surgical performance. Surg Endosc. 2004:111–4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8769-y
13. Eberspacher H, Immenroth M. Mentales Training--Hilft es auch dem modernen Chirurgen? Zentralbl Chir. 1999:895–901.
14. Stredney D, Wiet GJ, Yagel R, Sessanna D, Kurzion Y, Fontana M, et al. A comparative analysis of integrating visual representations with haptic displays. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1998:20–6.
15. Rudman DT, Stredney D, Sessanna D, Yagel R, Crawfis R, Heskamp D, et al. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery training simulator. Laryngoscope. 1998:1643–7. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199811000-00010
16. Klapan I, Barbir A, Simicic L, Risavi R, Besenski N, Bumber Z, et al. Dynamic 3D computer-assisted reconstruction of a metallic retrobulbar foreign body for diagnostic and surgical purposes.[Case report of orbital injury with ethmoid bone involvement]Orbit. 2001:35–49. doi: 10.1076/orbi.20.1.35.2645
17. Ecke U, Klimek L, Muller W, Ziegler R, Mann W. Virtual reality: preparation and execution of sinus surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 1998:45–50. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0150(1998)3:1<45::AIDIGS7>3.0. CO;2-L
18. Freysinger W, Gunkel AR, Thumfart WF. Image-guided endoscopic ENT surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997:343–6.
19. Hauser R, Westermann B, Probst R. A non-invasive patient registration and reference system for interactive intraoperative localization in intranasal sinus surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 1997:327–34. doi: 10.1243/0954411971534458
20. Schmerber S, Chassat F. Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology. Comput Aided Surg. 2001:1–13. doi: 10.1002/igs.1005
21. Rombaux P, Ledeghen S, Hamoir M, Bertrand B, Eloy P, Coche E, et al. Computer assisted surgery and endoscopicendonasal approach in 32 procedures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2003:131–7.
22. Varma TRK, Eldridge PR, Forster A, Fox S, Fletcher N, Steiger M, et al. Use of the NeuroMate stereotactic robot in a frameless mode for movement disorder surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003:132–5. doi: 10.1159/000075173
23. Federspil PA, Plinkert PK. Robotic surgery in otorhinolaryngology. Otolaryngol Pol. 2004:237–42.
24. Steinhart H, Bumm K, Wurm J, Vogele M, Iro H. Surgical application of a new robotic system for paranasal sinus surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004:303–9.
25. Gourin CG, Terris DJ. Surgical robotics in otolaryngology: expanding the technology envelope. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004:204–8.
26. Plinkert PK, Plinkert B, Hiller A, Stallkamp J. Einsatz eines Roboters an der lateralen Schadelbasis. Evaluation einer robotergesteuerten Mastoidektomie am anatomischen Praparat. HNO. 2001:514–22. doi: 10.1007/s001060170075
27. Plinkert PK, Federspil PA, Plinkert B, Henrich D. Kraftbasierte lokale Navigation zur robotergestutzten Implantatbettanlage in der lateralen Schadelbasis. Eine experimentelle Studie. HNO. 2002:233–9. doi: 10.1007/s00106-002-0633-9
28. Federspil PA, Geisthoff UW, Henrich D, Plinkert PK. Development of the first force-controlled robot for otoneurosurgery. Laryngoscope. 2003:465–71. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200303000-00014
29. Klein M, Hein A, Lueth T, Bier J. Robot-assisted placement of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003:712–8.
30. Federspil PA, Plinkert B, Plinkert PK. Experimental robotic milling in skull-base surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2003:42–8.
31. Zimmermann M, Krishnan R, Raabe A, Seifert V. Robotassisted navigated neuroendoscopy. Neurosurgery. 2002:1446–52. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200212000-00015
32. Hirzinger G, Brunner B, Landzettel K, Sporer N, Butterfass J, Schedl M. Space robotics-DLR's telerobotic concepts, lightweight arms and articulated hands. Auton Robots. 2003:127–45.
33. Gausemeier J. Intelligente mechatronische Systeme: Grundlagen, Methoden und Werkzeuge, Adaption und Selbstoptimierung, Mechatronik und Mikrosystemtechnik. Paderborn:HNI; 2004.
34. Maier W, Laszig R. Komplikationen der endonasalen Nebenhohlenchirurgie-diagnostische und therapeutische Konsequenzen. Laryngorhinootologie. 1998:402–9.
35. Keerl R, Stankiewicz J, Weber R, Hosemann W, Draf W. Surgical experience and complications during endonasal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1999:546–50. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199904000-00005
36. Bernal-Sprekelsen M, HSudhoff, Dazert S. Komplikationen nach endonasalen Eingriffen bei entzundlichen NNHErkrankungen. Laryngorhinootologie. 2004:23–8.
37. Schmerber S, Chen B, Lavallee S, Coulomb M, Chirossel JP, Lavieille JP, et al. La chirurgie endonasale sous guidage endoscopique assistee par ordinateur. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac. 2001:35–44.
38. Schipper J, Ridder GJ, Aschendorff A, Klenzner T, Arapakis I, Maier W. Verbessert die computergestutzte Navigation in der endonasalen Nasennebenhohlenchirurgie die Prozess- und die Ergebnisqualitat? Laryngorhinootologie. 2004:298–307.
39. Kuhnel T, Hosemann W, Rothammer R. Evaluation of powered instrumentation in out-patient revisional sinus surgery. Rhinology. 2001:215–9.
40. Selivanova O, Kuehnemund M, Mann WJ, Amedee RG. Comparison of conventional instruments and mechanical debriders for surgery of patients with chronic sinusitis. Am J Rhinol. 2003:197–202.
41. Marmulla R, Muhling J, Wirtz CR, Hassfeld S. High-resolution laser surface scanning for patient registration in cranial computer-assisted surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2004:72–8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-818471
42. Casap N, Wexler A, Persky N, Schneider A, Lustmann J. Navigation surgery for dental implants: assessment of accuracy of the image guided implantology system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004:116–9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.028
43. Dastidar P, Heinonen T, Numminen J, Rautiainen M, Laasonen E. Semi-automatic segmentation of computed tomographic images in volumetric estimation of nasal airway. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999:192–8. doi: 10.1007/s004050050138
44. Hertel I, Strauss G, Preim B. Surgical segmentation for preoperative planning for preoperative planning in paranasal sinus surgery, CARS 2004. Elsevier.
45. Klimek L, Ecke U, Lubben B, Witte J, Mann W. A passivemarker- based optical system for computer-aided surgery in otorhinolaryngology: development and first clinical experiences. Laryngoscope. 1999:1509–15. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199909000-00028
46. Khan M, Ecke U, Mann WJ. Der Einsatz eines optischen Navigationssystem in der Nasennebenhohlenchirurgie. HNO. 2003:209–15. doi: 10.1007/s00106-002-0749-y
47. Rombaux P, Ledeghen S, Hamoir M, Bertrand B, Eloy P, Coche E, et al. Computer assisted surgery and endoscopic endonasal approach in 32 procedures. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2003:131–7.
48. Meyer U, Wiesmann HP, Runte C, Fillies T, Meier N, Lueth T, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of insertion of dental implants and prosthetic treatment by computer-aided navigation in minipigs. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003:102–8. doi: 10.1016/S0266-4356(02)00297-8
49. Tiesenhausen Cv SOLT. A device for optimal registration in navigated procedures near the petrous bone. 2003;Elsevier.
50. Koulechov K LT. A new metric for drill location for Navigated Control in navigated dental implantology. CARS 2004;Elsevier.