Registration using three-dimensional laser surface scanning for navigation in oral and craniomaxillofacial surgery;Registrierung mit dreidimensionaler oberflächen-laserscanner-technik zur navigation in der mund-, kiefer-und gesichtschirurgie

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie

Volumn 128, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 551-556

  Troitzsch, D ^a   Hoffmann, Jurgen ^a   Dammann, F ^a   Bartz, D ^b   Reinert, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

3D laser surface scanner; Craniomaxillofacial surgery; Image guided navigation; Registration

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HUMAN; LASER SURGERY; MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY; ORAL SURGERY; PHANTOM; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; REGISTRATION; RELIABILITY; SKULL SURGERY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0043208860     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40811     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alp MS, Dujovny M et al. Head registration techniques for image-guided surgery. Neurol Res 1998; 20 (1): 31-37
2. Arridge S, Moss JP et al. Three dimensional digitization of the face and skull. J. Maxillofac Surg 1985; 13 (3): 136-143
3. Aung SC, Ngim RC et al. Evaluation of the laser scanner as a surface measuring tool and its accuracy compared with direct facial anthropometric measurements. Br J Plast Surg 1995; 48(8): 551-558
4. Birkfellner W, Solar P et al. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12 (1): 69-78
5. Bucholz R, Macneil W et al. Automated rejection of contaminated surface measurements for improved surface registration in image guided neurosurgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 2000; 70: 39-45
6. Bush K, Antonyshyn O. Three-dimensional facial anthropometry using a laser surface scanner: validation of the technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98 (2): 226-235
7. Fitzpatrick JM, West JB et al. Predicting error in rigid-body point-based registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17 (5): 694-702
8. Gaggl A, Schultes G et al. Navigational precision of drilling tools preventing damage to the mandibular canal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29 (5): 271-275
9. Hassfeld S, Muhling J. Comparative examination of the accuracy of a mechanical and an optical system in CT and MRT based instrument navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 29 (6): 400-407
10. Hassfeld S, Muhling J. Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery - a review and an assessment of technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 30 (1): 2-13
11. Hoffmann J, Dammann F et al. Intraoperative CT scans in patients with maxillofacial trauma using a mobile unit. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2002; 47 (6): 155-158
12. Linney AD, Grindrod SR et al. Three-dimensional visualization of computerized tomography and laser scan data for the simulation of maxillo-facial surgery. Med Inform (Lond) 1989; 14 (2): 109-121
13. Maurer CR, Maciunas RJ et al. Registration of head CT images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17: 753-761
14. Messmer P, Baumann B et al. Navigation systems for image-guided therapy: A review. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001; 173 (9): 777-784
15. Millesi W, Truppe M et al. Remote stereotactic visualization for image-guided surgery: technical innovation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997; 25 (3): 136-138
16. Pott P, Schwarz M. Robots, navigation, telesurgery: state of the art and market overview. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002; 140 (2): 218-231
17. Raabe A, Krishnan R et al. Laser surface scanning for patient registration in intracranial image-guided surgery. Neurosurgery 2002; 50 (4): 797-801
18. Siessegger M, Mischkowski RA et al. Image guided surgical navigation for removal of foreign bodies in the head and neck. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29 (6): 321-325
19. Siessegger M, Schneider BT et al. Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29 (5): 276-281
20. Steinmeier R, Rachinger J et al. Factors influencing the application accuracy of neuronavigation systems. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2000; 75 (4): 188-202
21. Sugano N, Sasama T et al. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg 2001; 6 (4): 195-203
22. Vaughan ED. The maxillofacial surgeon and cranial base surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 34 (1): 4-17
23. Vrionis FD, Foley KT et al. Use of cranial surface anatomic fiducials for interactive image-guided navigation in the temporal bone: a cadaveric study. Neurosurgery 1997; 40 (4): 755-763
24. Wagner A, Ploder 0 et al. Virtual image guided navigation in tumor surgery-technical innovation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1995; 23 (5): 217-223
25. Wagner A, Schicho K et al. Quantitative analysis of factors affecting intraoperative precision and stability of optoelectronic and electromagnetic tracking systems. Med Phys 2002; 29 (5): 905-912
26. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W et al. Evaluation of accuracy of computeraided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13 (1): 59-64
27. Watzinger F, Birkfellner W et al. Placement of endosteal implants in the zygoma after maxillectomy: a Cadaver study using surgical navigation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107 (3): 659-667
28. Wilson I, Snape L et al. An investigation of laser scanning techniques for quantifying changes in facial soft-tissue volume. N Z Dent J 1997: 93 (414): 110-113
29. Wolfsberger S, Rossler K et al. Anatomical landmarks for image registration in frameless stereotactic neuronavigation. Neurosurg Rev 2002; 25: 68-72