Evaluation of accuracy of insertion of dental implants and prosthetic treatment by computer-aided navigation in minipigs

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 102-108

  Meyer, Ulrich ^a   Weismann, H P ^a   Runte, C ^a   Fillies, T ^a   Meier, N ^a   Lueth, T ^b   Joos, U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Immediate loading; Implants; Navigation; Prosthetic treatment

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOLOGY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SWINE; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0038405208     PISSN: 02664356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0266-4356(02)00297-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 74 78.
2. Stanford CM. Biomechanical and functional behaviour of implants. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 88-92.
3. Hobkirk JA, Havthoulas TK. The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 169-174.
4. Watzinger F, Birkfellner W, Wanschitz F et al. Placement of endosteal implant in the zygoma after maxillectomy: a cadaver study using surgical navigation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 659-667.
5. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H. Navigational precision of drilling tools preventing damage to the mandibular canal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 271-275.
6. Siessegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA et al. Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:276-281.
7. Fortin T, Coudert JL, Champleboux G, Sautot P, Lavallee S. Computer-assisted dental implant surgery using computed tomography. J Image Guid Surg 1995; 1: 53-58.
8. Ploder O, Wagner A, Enislidis G, Ewers R. Computergestützte intraoperative Visualisierung von dentalen implantaten (Computer-based intraoperative visualisation of dental implants). Radiologe 1995; 35: 569-575.
9. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G, Nert I, Suetens P, Van Streenberghe D. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: a three dimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 806-810.
10. Watzinger F, Birkenfellner W, Wanschitz F et al. Positioning of dental implants using computer-aided navigation and an optical tracking system: case report and presentation of a new method. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999; 27: 77-81.
11. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 611-619.
12. Meyer U, Vollmer D, Runte C, Bourauel C, Joos U. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite element analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 100-105.
13. Meyer U, Vollmer D, Bourauel C, Joos U. Sensitivity analysis of bone geometries upon implant loading. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2001; 3: 121-126.
14. Weinberg LA. CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimal implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 381-385.
15. Bianchi SD, Lojacono, A, Nevins M. The use of replicate resin models in the treatment of maxillary sinus augmentation patients. Int J Periodont Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 348-357.
16. Mayfield-Donahoo TL, Stokely EM, Jeffcoat MK. Blur reduction of conventional film-based tomograms for presurgical evaluation of potential implant sites. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 362-368.
17. Vrionis FD, Foley KD, Robertson JH et al. Use of cranial surface anatomic fiducials for interactive image-guided navigation in the temporal bone: a cadaveric study. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 755-764.
18. Birkfellner W, Solar P, Gahleitner A et al. In vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 69-78.
19. Schramm A, Gellrich NC, Schimming R, Schmelzeisen R. Computer-assisted insertion of zygomatic implants (Branemark system) after extensive tumor surgery. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2000; 4: 292-295.
20. Kraut RA. Interactive CT diagnostics. Implant Dent 1998; 7: 19-25.
21. Zeilhofer HF, Kliegis U, Sader R, Horch HH. Video matching als intraoperative Navigationshilfe bei profilverbessernden Operationen (Video matching as an intraoperative navigation tool for facial operations). Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1997; 1: 68-70.
22. Gunkel AR, Thumfart WF, Freysinger W. Computer-aided 3D-navigation systems. Surgery and location determination. HNO 2000; 48: 75-90.
23. Brunski JB. In vivo bone response to biomechanical loading at the bone/dental-implant interface. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 99-119.
24. Szmukler-Moncler S, Piattelli A, Favero GA, Dubruille JH. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 12-25.
25. Chassat F, Lavallée S. Experimental protocol of accuracy evaluation for computer-integrated surgery: application to four optical localizers. In: Wells WM, Colchester A, Delps S, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI'98. Berlin: Springer, 1998: 277-286.