Locomotor training: Experiencing the changing body

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 905-916

  Hannold, Elizabeth M ^a,b,c   Young, Mary Ellen ^b   Rittman, Maude R ^a,b   Bowden, Mark G ^c   Behrman, Andrea L ^b,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Body modification; Locomotor training; Patient experiences; Physical therapy techniques; Qualitative research; Recovery of function; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury; Treadmill; Walking

Indexed keywords

BIPED LOCOMOTION; EXERCISE EQUIPMENT; NEUROLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT REHABILITATION; SENSORY PERCEPTION;

BODY MODIFICATION; LOCOMOTOR TRAINING; PATIENT EXPERIENCES; PHYSICAL THERAPY TECHNIQUES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

MEDICAL PROBLEMS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORY DYSFUNCTION; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; PARAPLEGIA; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROGNOSIS; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUADRIPLEGIA; RISK FACTORS; SAMPLING STUDIES; SEX FACTORS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33947376424     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.07.0122     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Estores IM. The consumer's perspective and the professional literature: What do persons with spinal cord injury want? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40(4 Suppl 1):93-98.
2. Kilgore KL, Scherer M, Bobblitt R, Dettloff J, Dombrowski DM, Godbold N, Jatich JW, Morris R, Penko JS, Schremp ES, Cash LA. Neuroprosthesis consumers' forum: Consumer priorities for research directions. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(6):655-60.
3. Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: Priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(10):1371-83.
4. Brown-Triolo DL, Roach MJ, Nelson K, Triolo RJ. Consumer perspectives on mobility: Implications for neuroprosthesis design. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(6):659-70.
5. Nelson AL. Patients' perspectives of a spinal cord injury unit. SCI Nurs. 1990;7(3):44-63.
6. Schmitt N. Patients' perception of laughter in a rehabilitation hospital. Rehabil Nurs. 1990;15(3):143-46.
7. Carpenter C. The experience of spinal cord injury: The individual's perspective - Implications for rehabilitation practice. Phys Ther. 1994;74(7):614-28; discussion 628-29.
8. Hannold E, Young ME. Consumer perspectives on the revised code of professional ethics for rehabilitation counselors. J Appl Rehabil Couns. 2001;32(4):5-9.
9. Potter M, Gordon S, Hamer P. The physiotherapy experience in private practice: The patients' perspective. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(3):195-202.
10. Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: Client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(24):1411-22.
11. Liu C, Thompson AJ, Playford ED. Patient dissatisfaction: Insights into the rehabilitation process. J Neurol. 2004;251(9):1094-97.
12. Wohlin Wottrich A, Stenstrom CH, Engardt M, Tham K, Von Koch L. Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(20):1198-1205.
13. Mulholland SJ, Packer TL, Laschinger SJ, Lysack JT, Wyss UP, Balaram S. Evaluating a new mobility device: Feedback from women with disabilities in India. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(3):111-22.
14. Agarwal S, Triolo RJ, Kobetic R, Miller M, Bieri C, Kukke S, Rohde L, Davis JA Jr. Long-term user perceptions of an implanted neuroprosthesis for exercise, standing, and transfers after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40(3):241-52.
15. Monninkhof E, Van der Aa M, Van der Valk P, Van der Palen J, Zielhuis G, Koning K, Pieterse M. A qualitative evaluation of a comprehensive self-management programme for COPD patients: Effectiveness from the patients' perspective. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55(2):177-84.
16. Woodend AK, Nair RC, Tang AS. Definition of life quality from a patient versus health care professional perspective. Int J Rehabil Res. 1997;20(1):71-80.
17. Callahan MB, LeSage L, Johnstone S. A model for patient participation in quality of life measurement to improve rehabilitation outcomes. Nephrol News Issues. 1999;13(1):33-37.
18. Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: Development of a patient-based measure of outcome. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(9):iii,1-48.
19. Payton OD, Nelson CE, Ozer MN. Patient participation in planning: A manual for therapists. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis; 1990. p. ix-xii.
20. Ozer MN, Payton OD, Nelson CE. Treatment planning for rehabilitation: A patient-centered approach. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2000. p. 41-72.
21. Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):693-700.
22. Jezernik S, Scharer R, Colombo G, Morari M. Adaptive robotic rehabilitation of locomotion: A clinical study in spinally injured individuals. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(12):657-66.
23. Field-Fote EC. Spinal cord control of movement: Implications for locomotor rehabilitation following spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2000;80(5):477-84.
24. Field-Fote EC. Combined use of body weight support, functional electric stimulation, and treadmill training to improve walking ability in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(6):818-24.
25. Barbeau H, Ladouceur M, Mirbagheri MM, Kearney RE. The effect of locomotor training combined with functional electrical stimulation in chronic spinal cord injured subjects: Walking and reflex studies. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2002;40(1-3):274-91.
26. Postans NJ, Hasler JP, Granat MH, Maxwell DJ. Functional electric stimulation to augment partial weight-bearing supported treadmill training for patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):604-10.
27. Daly JJ, Roenigk KL, Butler KM, Gansen EL, Fredrickson E, Marsolais EB, Rogers J, Ruff RL. Response of sagittal plane gait kinematics to weight-supported treadmill training and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(6):807-20.
28. Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Feasibility of combining multi-channel functional neuromuscular stimulation with weight-supported treadmill training. J Neurol Sci. 2004;225(1-2):105-15.
29. Behrman AL, Lawless-Dixon AR, Davis SB, Bowden MG, Nair P, Phadke C, Hannold EM, Plummer P, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training progression and outcomes after incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2005;85(12):1356-71.
30. Edgerton VR, Roy RR, Hodgson JA, Prober RJ, De Guzman CP, De Leon RD. A physiological basis for the development of rehabilitative strategies for spinally injured patients. J Am Paraplegia Soc. 1991;14(4):150-57.
31. Harkema SJ, Hurley SL, Patel UK, Requejo PS, Dobkin BH, Edgerton VR. Human lumbosacral spinal cord interprets loading during stepping. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77(2):797-811.
32. Barbeau H, McCrea DA, O'Donovan MJ, Rossignol S, Grill WM, Lemay MA. Tapping into spinal circuits to restore motor function. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999;30(1):27-51.
33. Barbeau H, Danakas M, Arsenault B. The effects of locomotor training in spinal cord injured subjects: A preliminary study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1993;5(1):81-84.
34. Gardner MB, Holden MK, Leikauskas JM, Richard RL. Partial body weight support with treadmill locomotion to improve gait after incomplete spinal cord injury: A single-subject experimental design. Phys Ther. 1998;78(4):361-74.
35. Behrman AL, Harkema SJ. Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: A series of case studies. Phys Ther. 2000;80(7):688-700.
36. Dobkin B, Apple D, Barbeau H, Basso M, Behrman AL, Deforge D, Ditunno J, Dudley G, Elashoff R, Fugate L, Harkema SJ, Saulino M, Scott M, Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial Group. Weight-supported treadmill vs overground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI. Neurol. 2006;66(4):484-93.
37. Visintin M, Barbeau H. The effects of body weight support on the locomotor pattern of spastic paretic patients. Can J Neurol Sci. 1989;16(3):315-25.
38. De Leon RD, Roy RR, Edgerton VR. Is the recovery of stepping following spinal cord injury mediated by modifying existing neural pathways or by generating new pathways? A perspective. Phys Ther. 2001;81(12):1904-11.
39. Edgerton VR, De Leon RD, Harkema SJ, Hodgson JA, London N, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Roy RR, Talmadge RJ, Tillakaratne NJ, Timoszyk W, Tobin A. Retraining the injured spinal cord. J Physiol. 2001;533(Pt 1):15-22.
40. Harkema SJ. Neural plasticity after human spinal cord injury: Application of locomotor training to the rehabilitation of walking. Neuroscientist. 2001;7(5):455-68.
41. Nymark J, DeForge D, Barbeau H, Badour M, Bercovitch S, Tomas J, Goudreau L, MacDonal J. Body weight support treadmill gait training in the subacute recovery phase of incomplete spinal cord injury. J Neuro Rehabil. 1998;12(3):119-38.
42. Protas EJ, Holmes SA, Qureshy H, Johnson A, Lee D, Sherwood AM. Supported treadmill ambulation training after spinal cord injury: A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(6):825-31.
43. Effing TW, Van Meeteren NL, Van Asbeck FW, Prevo AJ. Body weight-supported treadmill training in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: A pilot study evaluating functional health status and quality of life. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(5):287-96.
44. Hicks AL, Adams MM, Martin Ginis K, Giangregorio L, Latimer A, Phillips SM, McCartney N. Long-term body-weight-supported treadmill training and subsequent follow-up in persons with chronic SCI: Effects on functional walking ability and measures of subjective well-being. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(5):291-98.
45. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York (NY): Aldine de Gruyter; 1967. p. 61.
46. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1990. p. 131, 187-188.
47. Berman C, Rose L. Examination of a patient's adaptation to quadriplegia. Phys Ther Case Rep. 1998;1(3):148-56.
48. Seymour W. Remaking the body. New York (NY): Routledge; 1998. p. 1-30.
49. Duggan CH, Dijkers M. Quality of life - Peaks and valleys: A qualitative analysis of the narratives of persons with spinal cord injuries. Can J Rehabil. 1999;12(3):179-90.
50. Duggan CH, Dijkers M. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46(1):3-27.
51. Glesne C. Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. 2nd ed. Reading (MA): Longman; 1999. p. 135.
52. Miles, MB, Huberman, AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1994. p. 277-80.
53. Becker G. Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 1997. p. 37-58.
54. Ellis-Hill CS, Payne S, Ward C. Self-body split: Issues of identity in physical recovery following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22(16):725-33.
55. Turner BS. Medical power and social knowledge. 2nd ed. London (England): Sage Publications; 1995. p. 18-19,84-85.