Discourse analysis and foreign language teacher educationl

Educational Linguistics

Volumn 4, Issue , 2005, Pages 341-364

  Belz, Julie A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Discourse analysis; Foreign language; Language teacher; Linguistic term; Literary text

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847718267     PISSN: 15720292     EISSN: 22151656     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2954-3_20     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Albert, R. (1995). Der Bedarf des Fachs Deutsch als Fremdsprache an linguistischer Forschung. Deutschals Fremdsprache, 2, 82-90.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. (Translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist: Ed. Michael Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3. Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistics perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-117.
4. Belz, J. A. (2002b). Identity, deficiency, and first language use in foreign language education. In C. Blyth (Ed.), The Sociolrnguistics of the Foreign Language Classroom: Contributions ofthe Native, Non-Native, and Near-Native Speaker. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
5. Belz, J. A. (2002a). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81.
6. Belz, J. A. & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53(4), 591-647.
7. Bernhardt, E. B. (1997). Victim narratives or victimizing narratives? Discussions of the reinvention of language departments and language programs. ADFL Bulletin, 29(1), 13-19.
8. Bernhardt, E. B. & Hammadou, J. (1987). A decade of research in foreign language teacher education. Modern Language Journal, 71(3), 289-299.
9. Burton, D. (1982). Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses. In R.Carter (Ed.), Language and Literature. Allen & Unwin.
10. Byrnes, H. (1986). Interactional style in German and American conversations. Text, 2(1), 189-206.
11. Byrnes, H. (1998). Constructing curricula in collegiate foreign language departments. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning Foreign and Second Languages: Perspectives in Research and Scholarship. New York: The Modem Language Association of America.
12. Byrnes, H. (2001). Reconsidering graduate students' education as teachers: "It takes a department!" ModernLanguage Juurnal, 85(4), 512-530.
13. Byrnes, H. (2002). Language and culture: Shall the twain ever meet in foreign language departments? ADFL Bulletin, 33(2), 25-32.
14. Carter, B. & Sealey, A. (2000). Language, structure, and agency: What can realist social theory offer to sociolinguistics? Journal ofSociolinguistics, 4(1), 3-20.
15. Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
16. Cazden, C. (1992). Performing expository prose in the foreign language classroom. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet (Eds.), Text and Context: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives on Language Study. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
17. Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Dorr-Bremme, D. (1990). Contextualization cues in the classroom: Discourse regulation and social control functions. Language in Society, 19, 379-402.
19. Eskey, D. (1997). The IEP as a nontraditional entity. In M. A. Christison & F. L. Stoller (Eds.), A Handbook for Language Program Administrators. Burlingame, CA: Aka Book Center.
20. Fowler, R. (1 996). Linguistic Criticism (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Fleischman, S. (1990). Tense and Narrativify. Austin: University of Texas Press.
22. Freeman, D. (1996a). "To take them at their word": Language data in the study of teachers' knowledge. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 732-76 1.
23. Freeman, D. (1996b). Redefining the relationship between research and what teachers know. In K. D. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
24. Freeman, D. & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-417.
25. Freeman, D. & Richards, J. (1996). Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. Camhridge: Camhridge University Press.
26. Gee, J. P. (1999). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Theory and Method. London and New York: Routledge.
27. Golombek, P. (1998). A study of language teachers' personal practical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 447-465.
28. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
29. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93-1 16.
30. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Funclional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
31. Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse andLanguage Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. House, J. (1996). Contrastive discourse analysis and misunderstanding: The case of German and English. In M. Hellinger & U. Ammon (Eds.), Contrastive Sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gmyter.
33. House, J. (2000). Understanding misunderstanding: A pragmatic-discourse approach to analysing mismanaged rapport in talk across cultures. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally Speaking. Managing Relations across Cultures. London: Continuum.
34. Hufeisen, B. (2002). Ein deutsches Rejirat ist kein englisch-sprachiges Essay. Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.
35. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and Identity; The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Wnting. Amsterdam and Philadelph~a:J ohn Benjamins.
36. Johnson, K. E. (1994). The emerging beliefs and instmctional practices of pre-service ESL teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10,439-452.
37. Johnson, K. E. (1995). Understanding Communication in Second Language Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Johnson, K. E. & Golombek, P. (2002).Teachers' Narrative Inquiry as Professional Development. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
39. Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. Kaplan, R. B. (1997). An IEP is a many-splendored thing. In M. A. Christison & F. L. Stoller (Eds.), A Handbook for Language Program Administrators. Burlingame, CA: Alta Book Center.
41. Kinginger, C. (1997). A discourse approach to the study of language educators' coherence systems. Modern Language Journal, 8 1 (I), 6- 14.
42. Kotthoff, H. (1989). So nah und doch so fern. Injbrmationen Deutsch als Fremhprache, 16(4), 448-459.
43. Kramsch, C. (1987). Foreign language textbooks' construction of foreign reality. Canadian Modern Language Review, 44(1), 95-1 19.
44. Kramsch, C. (1988). The cultural discourse of foreign language textbooks. In A. J. Singerman (Ed.), Toward a New Integration of Language and Culture. Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference.
45. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and Culture in Language Teaching. Camhridge: Camhridge University Press.
46. Kramsch, C. (1995). Embracing conflict versus achieving consensus in foreign language education. ADFL Bulletin, 26(3), 6-12.
47. Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 3 1 1-326.
48. Kramsch, C. (2002). Language and culture: A social semiotic perspective. ADFL Bulletin. 33(2), 8-15.
49. Lahov, W. (1972). Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
50. Lakoff, G. &Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Lansburgh, W. (1 997). Dear Doasie: Eine Liebesgeschichte in Briefen. Munich: Nymphenherger Verlag.
52. Layder, D. (1993). New Strategies in Social Research. Camhridge: Polity Press.
53. Long, M. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 649-666.
54. McAdams, D. (1996). Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons. Psychological Inquiry 7,295-32 1.
55. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. (1994). Language as Discourse: Per~pectives~fuLra nguage Teaching. London: Longman.
57. McHoul, A. & Luke, A. (1989). Discourse as language and politics: An introduction to the Philology of political culture in Australia. Journal ofpragmatics, 13(3), 323-332.
58. Mehan, H. (1990). Learning Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Morris, M. (2001). Factors affecting the congruence of beliefs about teaching and classroom practices of GTAs in elementary foreign language courses. Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 8(2).
60. Numrich. C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 131-153.
61. Ong, W. (1988). Oralip and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge.
62. Poole, D. (2002). "Discourse analysis and applied linguistics." In R. Kaplan (Ed.), The Onfbrd Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Richards, J., Platt, J. & Weber, H. (1985). The Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Essex, England: Longman.
64. Rivers, W. (1993). The undergraduate program: Autonomy and empowerment. In D. P. Bensekr (Ed), The Dynamics of Language Program Direction. Boston, M: Heinle & Heinle.
65. Salaberri, S. & Appel. G. (in press). Assessment and diversiw: Development of personal identities through portfolios. In M.J. Raya, & T. Lamb (Eds.), Differentiation in the Modern Languages Classroom. Frankfirrt am Main: Peter Lang
66. Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1-24.
67. Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
68. Scott, V. & Tucker, H. (2001). SLA and the Literature Classroom: Fostering Dialogues. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
69. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
70. Schulz, R. (2000). Foreign language teacher development: MLJ perspectives 1916-1999. Modern Language Journal,84,496-522.
71. Seeba, H. C. (1989). Critique of identity formation: Toward an intercultural model of German Studies. German Quarterly, 62, 144- 154.
72. Seidel, J. (1998). Ethnograph v5.O: A Users ' Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Scolari, Sage Publications Software.
73. Simpson, P. (1993). Language, Ideologv, and Point of View. London: Routledge.
74. Teschner, R. (1987). A profile ofthe specialization and expertise of lower division foreign language program directors in American universities. Modem Language Journal, 71(1), 28-35.
75. VBlez-Rendon, G. (2002). Second language teacher education: A review of the literature. Foreign language Annals, 35(4), 457-467.
76. Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in Action: A Strategy,for Research and Analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.