Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science

Scientometrics

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 267-278

  Tomov, D T ^a   Mutafov E, H G ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VARNA   (Bulgaria)

^b Centre for Medical Information   (Bulgaria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009153575     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02093624     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. M. CALLON, J.-P. COURTIAL, W. A. TURNER, S. BAUIN, From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis, Social Science Information, 22 (1983) 191-123.
2. A. RIP, J.-P. COURTIAL, Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics, Scientometrics, 6 (1984) 381-400.
3. H. SMALL, E. SWEENEY, Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. I. Comparison of methods, Scientometrics, 1 (1985) 391-409.
4. H. SMALL, E. SWEENEY, E. GREENLEE, Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations. II. Mapping science, Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 321-340.
5. A. F. J. VAN RAAN, H. P. F. PETERS, Dynamics of a scientific field analysed by co-subfield structures, Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 607-620.
6. R. R. BRAAM, H. F. MOED, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Comparison and combination of co-citation and co-word clustering, In: Science and Technology Indicators: Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in Science Studies A. F. J. VAN RAAN, A. J. NEDERHOF, H. F. MOED (Eds.), DSWO Press, Leiden 1989, pp. 307-337.
7. R. TODOROV, Representing a scientific field: A bibliometric approach, Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 593-605.
8. R. J. W. TUSSEN, A qantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research. Research Policy, 21 (1992) 27-44.
9. H. P. F. PETERS, D. HARTMANN, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Monitoring advances in chemical engineering: A multi-database approach, Research report to the Netherlands Technological Research Council (STW), research report SSU-87-01, Science Studies Unit, University of Leiden, Leiden 1987, p. 183.
10. R. TODOROV, Co-classification analysis for science mapping: An example from superconductivity, In: Science and Technology Indicators: Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in Science Studies. A. F. J. VAN RAAN, A. J. NEDERHOF, H. F. MOED (Eds.), DSWO Press, Leiden 1989, pp. 261-270.
11. E. C. ENGELSMAN, A. J. F. VAN RAAN, Mapping of technology: A first exploration of knowledge diffusion amongst fields of technology. Policy studies on technology and economy series No 15, Ministry of Economics Affairs, The Hague, 1991, p. 71.
12. J. KING, A Review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation, Journal of Information Science, 13 (1987) 261-276.
13. P. VINKLER, An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes, Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 239-259.
14. E. C. M. NOYONS, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Monitoring scientific performance in a dynamic perspective, In: Fourth International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Performance at the National, Regional and Institutional Level, Antwerp, October 5-7, 1995, Abstracts, pp. 29-32.
15. D. TOMOV, A method for scientometric analysis of international scientific communications, Sotsiologicheski Pregled, (1986) No 7, 67-72 (in Bulgarian).
16. D. TOMOV, Z. NANOV, International scientific communications in Morphological Journals. I. Publication activity, Verhandlungen der Anatomischen Gesellschaft, 82 (1989) 1019-1021.
17. D. TOMOV, Z. NANOV, International scientific communications in Morphological Journals. II. Reviewing, secondary abstracting and citation analysis, Verhandlungen der Anatomischen Gesellschaft, 82 (1989) 1023-1024.
18. D. TOMOV, International communication patterns in an interdisciplinary field: Contrast media research, In: Fifth International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Rosary College, June 7-10, 1995, Learned Information, Inc., Medford, NJ, Proceedings, p. 697.
19. D. TOMOV, S. POPOVA, N. FESCHIEVA, Institutionalization of modern research in an interdisciplinary field: Disability and ageing (Submitted for Publication).
20. B. SIMON, Criteria for evaluating interdisciplinary papers for the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 41 (1993) 1199-1204.
21. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, Cartography of science: Scientometric mapping with multidimensional scaling methods, DSWO Press, Leiden 1992, p. 307.
22. A. L. PORTER, F. A. ROSSINI, Interdisciplinary research redefined: Multi-skill, problem-focused research in the STRAP framework, R & D Management, 14 (1984) 105-111.
23. A. L. PORTER, D. E. CHUBIN, An indicator of cross-disciplinary research, Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 161-176.
24. F. W. LANCASTER, User education: The next major thrust in information science? Journal of Education for Librarianship, 11 (1970) 55-63.