Predator odor recognition and antipredatory response in fish: does the prey know the predator diel rhythm?

Acta Oecologica

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-7

  Ylönen, Hannu ^a   Kortet, Raine ^b   Myntti, Janne ^a   Vainikka, Anssi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b Faculty of Behavioural Sciences   (Finland)

^c Institute of Coastal Research   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Antipredatory behavior; Odors; Perch; Predation risk; Recognition; Ruffe

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY PATTERN; ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; DIEL MIGRATION; FISH; ODOR; PREDATION RISK; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; RECOGNITION;

ESOX LUCIUS; GYMNOCEPHALUS CERNUUS; LOTA; LOTA LOTA; PERCA FLUVIATILIS; PERCIDAE;

EID: 33847352603     PISSN: 1146609X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2005.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abramsky Z., Strauss E., Subach A., Kotler B.P., and Riechmann A. The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and mircohabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbi and G. pyramidum. Oecologia 105 (1996) 313-319
2. Brown G.E., Chivers D.P., and Smith J.F. Differential learning rates of chemical versus visual cues of a northern pike by fathead minnows in a natural habitat. Environm. Biol. Fishes 49 (1997) 89-96
3. Brown G.E., Paige J.A., and Godin J.J. Chemically mediated predator inspection behaviour in the absence of predator visual cues by a characin fish. Anim. Behav. 60 (2000) 315-321
4. Brown G.E., Golub J.L., and Plata D.L. Attack cone avoidance during predator nspection visits by wild finescale dace (Phoxinus neogaeus): the effects of predator diet. J. Chem. Ecol. 27 (2001) 1657-1666
5. Carl L.M. Sonic tracking of burbot in Lake Oregon, Ontario. Trans. Am. Fisher. Soc. 124 (1994) 77-83
6. Chivers D.P., Brown G.E., and Smith R.J.F. Acquired recognition of chemical stimuli from picke Esox lucius, by brook sticklebacks, Culaea inconstans (Osteichthyes, Gasterosteidae). Ethology 99 (1995) 234-242
7. Chivers D.P., and Smith R.J.F. Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: a review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5 (1998) 338-352
8. Diana J.S. Diel activity pattern and swimming speeds of northern pike (Esox lucius) in Lac Ste. Anne, Alberta. Can. J. Fisher. Aquat. Sci. 37 (1980) 1454-1458
9. Dowling L.M., and Godin J.G. Refuge use in a killfish: influence of body size and nutritional state. Can. J. Zool. 80 (2002) 782-788
10. Eklöv P., and Persson L. Species specific antipredatory capacities and prey refuges: interactions between piscivorous perch (Perca fluviatilis) and juvenile perch and roach (Rutilus rutilus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37 (1995) 169-178
11. Hirvonen H., Ranta E., Piironen J., Laurila A., and Peuhkuri N. Behavioural responses of naive Arctic charr young to chemical cues from salmonid and non-salmonid fish. Oikos 88 (2000) 191-199
12. Huuskonen H., and Karjalainen J. Predator-induced respiratory responses in juveniles of vendace Coregonus albula, whitefish C. lavaretus, perch Perca fluviatilis and roach Rutilus rutilus. Environm. Biol. Fishes 49 (1997) 265-269
13. Jachner A. The response of bleak to predator odour of unfed and recently fed pike. J. Fish Biol. 50 (1997) 878-886
14. Jachner A. Anti-predator behaviour of naïve compared with experienced juvenile roach. J. Fish Biol. 59 (2001) 1313-1322
15. Jachner A., and Janecki T. Feeding and growth response of roach, Rutilus rutilus, to alarm substance. Environm. Biol. Fishes 54 (1999) 433-437
16. Jamet J.L., and Lair N. An example of diel feeding cycle of two percids, perch (Perca fluviatilis) and ruffee (Gymnocephalus cernuus) in eutrophic Lake Aydat (France). Ann. des Sci. Nat. Zool. et Biol. Anim. 12 3 (1991) 99-105
17. Jedrzejewski W., Rychlik L., and Jedrzejewska B. Responses of bank voles to odours of seven species of predators: experimental data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships. Oikos 68 (1993) 251-257
18. Kats L.B., and Dill L.M. The scent of death: chemosensory assessment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5 (1998) 361-394
19. Koli L. Finnish Fish (In Finnish) (1990), WSOY
20. Lima S.L., and Dill L.M. Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68 (1990) 619-640
21. Magurran A.E. Acquired recognition of predator odour in the European minnow (Phoxinus phoxinus). Ethology 82 (1989) 216-223
22. Magurran A.E. The adaptive significance of schooling as an anti-predatory defence in fish. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 27 (1990) 51-66
23. Magurran A.E., Irving P.W., and Henderson P.A. Is there a fish alarm pheromone? A wild study and critique. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 263 (1996) 1551-1556
24. Mathis A., and Smith R.J.F. Fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize northern pike, Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike's diet. Anim. Behav. 46 (1993) 645-656
25. Milinski M., and Heller R. Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks. Nature 275 (1978) 642-644
26. Müller K. Seasonal phase shift and the duration of activity time in the burbot, Lota lota (L.) (Pisces, Gadidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 84 (1973) 357-359
27. Norrdahl K., and Korpimäki E. Mortality factors in a cyclic vole population. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 261 (1995) 49-53
28. Pettersson L.B., Nilsson P.A., and Brönmark C. Predator recognition and defence strategies in crucial carp, Carassius carassius. Oikos 88 (2000) 200-212
29. Pääkkönen J.J., Laitinen M., and Marjomäki T. Total activity of burbot Lota lota (L.) measured with bioelectric monitoring system: seasonal differences in activity length. In: Paragamian V.L., and Willis D.W. (Eds). Burbot: Biology, Ecology and Management. Amer. Fisher. Soc. Fisher. Manage (2000) 38-47
30. Relyea R.A. How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology 84 (2003) 1827-1839
31. Sih A. Optimal behaviour: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?. Science 210 (1980) 1041-1043
32. Smith R.J.F. Does one result trump all others? A response to Magurran, Irving and Henderson. Proc. R. Soc. Lond, B 264 (1997) 445-450
33. Vainikka A., Jokelainen T., Kortet R., and Ylönen H. Predation risk allocation or direct vigilance response in the predation interaction between perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and pike (Esox lucius L.). Ecol. Fresw. Fish. 14 (2005) 225-232
34. Vermej G.J. Unsuccessful predation and evolution. Am. Nat. 120 (1982) 701-720
35. Werner E.E., Gilliam J.F., Hall D.L., and Mittelbach G.G. An test f the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64 (1983) 1540-1548
36. Wysujack K., Laude U., Anwand K., and Mehner T. Stocking, population development and food composition of pike Esox lucius in the biomanipulated Feldberger Haussee (Germany) implications for fisheries management. Limnologica 31 (2001) 45-51
37. Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis (1999), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey