Predation risk allocation or direct vigilance response in the predator interaction between perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and pike (Esox lucius L.)?

Ecology of Freshwater Fish

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 225-232

  Vainikka, A ^a   Jokelainen, T ^a   Kortet, R ^b   Ylonen H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Antipredatory behaviour; Olfaction; Shoaling; Visual

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; PREDATION RISK; VIGILANCE;

ESOX LUCIUS; PERCA FLUVIATILIS;

EID: 28144444817     PISSN: 09066691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00095.x     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Abramsky, Z., Strauss, E., Subach, A., Kotler, B.P. & Riechmann, A. 1996. The effect of barn owls (Tyto alba) on the activity and mircohabitat selection of Gerbillus allenbi and G. pyramidum. Oecologia 105: 313-319.
2. Buskirk, J.V., Müller, C., Portman, A. & Surbeck, M. 2002. A test of the risk allocation hypothesis; tadpole responses to temporal change in predation risk. Behavioral Ecology 13: 526-530.
3. Chivers, D.P. & Smith, R.J.F. 1998. Chemical alarm signalling in aquatic predator-prey systems: A review and prospectus. Ecoscience 5: 338-352.
4. Eklöv, P. 1997. Effects of habitat complexity and prey abundance on the spatial and temporal distributions of perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pike (Esox lucius). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54: 1520-1531.
5. Eklöv, P. & Persson, L. 1996. The response of prey to the risk of predation: proximate cues for refuging juvenile fish. Animal Behaviour 51: 105-115.
6. Ghan, D., McPhail, J.D. & Hyatt, K.D. 1998. The temporalspatial pattern of vertical migration by the freshwater copepod Skistodiaptomus oregonensis relative to predation risk. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1350-1363.
7. Hamilton, I.A. & Heithaus, M.R. 2001. The effects of temporal variation in predation risk on antipredatory behaviour: an empirical test using marine snails. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268: 2585-2588.
8. Huuskonen, H. & Karjalainen, J. 1997. Predator-induced respiratory responses in juveniles of vendace Coregonus albula, whitefish C. lavaretus, perch Perca fluviatilis and roach Rutilus rutilus. Environmental Biology of Fishes 49: 265-269.
9. Kokko, H. & Ruxton, G.D. 2000. Breeding suppression and predator-prey dynamics. Ecology 81: 252-260.
10. Kotler, B.P., Ayal, Y. & Subach, A. 1994. Effects of predatory risk and resource renewal on the timing of foraging activity in a gerbil community. Oecologia 100: 391-396.
11. Lima, S.L. & Bednekoff, P.A. 1999. Temporal variation in danger drives antipredatory behavior: the predation risk allocation hypothesis. The American Naturalist 153: 649-659.
12. Lima, S.L. & Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 619-640.
13. Mathis, A. & Smith, R.J.F. 1993. Fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize northern pike, Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike's diet. Animal Behaviour 46: 645-656.
14. Milinski, M. & Heller, R. 1978. Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks. Nature 275: 642-644.
15. Pecor, K.W. & Hazlett, B.A. 2003. Frequency of encounter with risk and the tradeoff between pursuit and antipredatory behaviours in crayfish: a test of the risk allocation hypothesis. Ethology 109: 97-106.
16. Powell, F. & Banks, P.B. 2004. Do house mice modify their foraging behaviour in response to predator odours and habitat? Animal Behaviour 67: 753-759.
17. Ruxton, G.D. & Lima, S.L. 1997. Predator-induced breeding suppression and its consequences for predator-prey population dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 264: 409-415.
18. Sih, A. 1980. Optimal behaviour: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? Science 210: 1041-1043.
19. Sih, A. & McCarthy, T.M. 2002. Prey responses to pulses of risk and safety: testing the risk allocation hypothesis. Animal Behaviour 63: 437-443.
20. Sinclair, A.R.E. & Arcese, P. 1995. Population consequences of predation-sensitive foraging: the Serengeti wildebeest. Ecology 76: 882-891.
21. Stabeil, O.B. & Lwin, M.S. 1997. Predator-induced phenotypic changes in crucian carp are caused by chemical signals from conspecifics. Environmental Biology of Fishes 49: 145-149.
22. Sundell, J., Dudek, D., Klemme, I., Koivisto, E., Pusenius, J. & Ylönen, H. 2004. Temporal variation of fear and vole behaviour: an experimental field test of the predation risk allocation hypothesis. Oecologia 139: 157-162.
23. Utne, A.C.W., Brännäs, E. & Manghagen, C. 1997. Individual responses to predation risk and food density in perch (Perca fluviatilis L.). Canadian Journal of Zoology 75: 2027-2035.
24. Werner, E.E., Gilliam, J.F., Hall, D.L. & Mittelbach, G.G. 1983. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64: 1540-1548.
25. Wysujack, K., Laude, U., Anwand, K. & Mehner, T. 2001. Stocking, population development and food composition of pike Esox lucius in the biomanipulated Feldberger Haussee (Germany) - implications for fisheries management. Limnologica 31: 45-51.
26. Ylönen, H. & Brown, J.S. in press. Fear and the foraging, breeding and sociality in rodents. In: Wolff, J.O. & Sherman, P.W., eds. Rodent societies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.