Genetic differentiation and gene flow among populations of the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus, vary with landscape connectivity

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1897-1909

  Keyghobadi, Nusha ^a,b,c   Roland, Jens ^a   Strobeck, Curtis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b OKANAGAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Canada)

^c Okanagan University College   (Canada)

Author keywords

Butterfly; F st; Gene flow; Isolation by distance; Landscape; Microsatellite

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BUTTERFLY; CANADA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; HETEROZYGOTE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; CANADA; ENVIRONMENT; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; HETEROZYGOTE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

PARNASSIUS SMINTHEUS;

EID: 20144381746     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02563.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N (2002) The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology, 11, 155-165.
2. Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow, and population structure. Quarterly Review of Biology, 74, 21-45.
3. Bohonak AJ (2002) IBD (ISOLATION BY DISTANCE): a program for analyses of isolation by distance. Journal of Heredity, 93, 153-154.
4. Britten HB, Brussard PF, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR (1995) A test for isolation-by-distance in Central Rocky Mountain and Great Basin populations of Edith's checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha). Journal of Heredity, 86, 204-210.
5. Caccone A, Sbordoni V (1987) Molecular evolutionary divergence among North American cave crickets. I. Allozyme variation. Evolution, 41, 1198-1214.
6. Cain DH, Ritters K, Orvis K (1997) A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Landscape Ecology, 12, 199-212.
7. Gastric V, Bonney F, Bernatchez L (2001) Landscape structure and hierarchical genetic diversity in the brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. Evolution, 55, 1016-1028.
8. Costello AB, Down TE, Pollard SM, Pacas CJ, Taylor EB (2003) The influence of history and contemporary stream hydrology on the evolution of genetic diversity within species: an examination of microsatellite DNA variation in bull trout, Salvelinus confluentus (Pisces: Salmonidae). Evolution, 57, 328-344.
9. DeChaine EG, Martin AP (2004) Historic cycles of fragmentation and expansion in Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae) inferred using mitochondrial DNA. Evolution, 58, 113-127.
10. Ehrlich PR, Raven PH (1969) Differentiation of populations. Science, 165, 1228-1232.
11. Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
12. Forman RTT, Godron M (1986) Landscape Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
13. Fownes SL (1999) Meadow suitability and quality for the alpine butterfly, Parnassius smintheus, in the east slopes of the Canadian Rockies. MSc Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
14. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT version 1.2: a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485-486.
15. Guppy CS (1986) The adaptive significance of alpine melanism in the butterfly Parnassius phoebus F. (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Oecologia, 70, 205-213.
16. Gustafson EJ (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems, 1, 143-156.
17. Hargis CD, Bissonette JA, David JL (1998) The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 13, 167-186.
18. Harper GL, Maclean N, Goulson D (2003) Microsatellite markers to assess the influence of population size, isolation and demographic change on the genetic structure of the UK butterfly Polyommatus bellargus. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3349-3357.
19. Hutchison DW, Templeton AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution, 53, 1898-1914.
20. Jaeger JAG (2000) Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology, 15, 115-130.
21. Keyghobadi N, Roland J, Strobeck C (1999) Influence of landscape on the population genetic structure of the alpine butterfly Parnassius smintheus (Papilionidae). Molecular Ecology, 8, 1481-1495.
22. Keyghobadi N, Roland J, Strobeck C (2002) Isolation of novel microsatellite loci in the Rocky Mountain apollo butterfly, Parnassius smintheus. Hereditas, 136, 247-250.
23. King PS (1987) Macro- and microgeographic structure of a spatially subdivided beetle species in nature. Evolution, 41, 401-416.
24. Knutsen H, Rukke BA, Jorde PE, Ims RA (2000) Genetic differentiation among populations of the beetle Bolitophagus reticulatus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in a fragmented and a continuous landscape. Heredity, 84, 667-676.
25. Legendre P, Vaudor A (1991) The R Package: multidimensional analysis, spatial analysis, Version 3.0. Université de Montréal, Montréal.
26. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209-220.
27. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
28. McGarigal K, Marks B (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351.
29. Meglécz E, Pecsenye K, Peregovits L, Varga Z (1998) Effects of population size and habitat fragmentation on the genetic variability of Parnassius mnemosyne (Linnaeus 1758) populations in NE Hungary. Acta Zoologica Hungarica, 43, 183-190.
30. Meglécz E, Solignac M (1998) Microsatellite loci for Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera). Hereditas, 128, 179-180.
31. Mennechez G, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2003) Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: comparison of demographic parameters and dispersal between a continuous and a highly fragmented landscape. Landscape Ecology, 18, 279-291.
32. Michels E, Cottenie K, Neys L et al. (2001) Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton populations in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modelling of the effective geographical distance. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1929-1938.
33. Mossman CA, Waser PM (2001) Effects of habitat fragmentation on population genetic structure in the white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 79, 285-295.
34. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist, 106, 283-292.
35. Nei M, Roychoudhury AK (1974) Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics, 76, 379-390.
36. Paetkau D, Waits LP, Clarkson PL, Craighead L, Strobeck C (1997) An empirical evaluation of genetic distance statistics using microsatellite data from bear (Ursidae) populations. Genetics, 147, 1943-1957.
37. Peterson MA, Denno RF (1998) The influence of dispersal and diet breadth on patterns of genetic isolation by distance in phytophagous insects. American Naturalist, 152, 428-446.
38. Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology, 12, 844-855.
39. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
40. Roland J, Keyghobadi N, Fownes S (2000) Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology, 81, 1642-1653.
41. Schmitt T, Varga Z, Seitz A (2000) Forests as dispersal barriers for Erebia medusa (Nymphalidae, Lepidoptera). Basic and Applied Ecology, 1, 53-59.
42. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) ARLEQUIN Version 2.000: a software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
43. Shoemaker DD, Jaenike J (1997) Habitat continuity and the genetic structure of Drosophila populations. Evolution, 51, 1326-1332.
44. Slatkin M (1985) Gene flow in natural populations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 393-430.
45. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics, 139, 457-462.
46. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. W.H. Freeman, New York.
47. Taylor PD, Fahrig L, Henein K, Merriam G (1993) Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 68, 571-572.
48. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90, 7-19.
49. VanDongen S, Backeljau T, Matthysen E, Dhondt AA (1998) Genetic population structure of the winter moth (Operophtera brumata L.) (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) in a fragmented landscape. Heredity, 80, 92-100.
50. Vos CC, Antonisse-De Jong AG, Goedhart PW, Smulders MJM (2001) Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity, 86, 598-608.
51. Vucetich LM, Vucetich JA, Joshi CP, Waite TA, Peterson RO (2001) Genetic (RAPD) diversity in Peromyscus maniculatus populations in a naturally fragmented landscape. Molecular Ecology, 10, 35-40.
52. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370.
53. Wilcox D, Dove B, McDavid D, Greer D (1995) IMAGETOOL for Windows, Version 2.00. University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio.
54. Williams BL, Brawn JD, Paige KN (2003) Landscape scale genetic effects of habitat fragmentation on a high gene flow species: Speyeria idalia (Nymphalidae). Molecular Ecology, 12, 11-20.
55. Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97-159.
56. Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics, 28, 114-138.
57. Wright S (1977) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, Vol. 3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
58. Yasuda N, Kimura M (1968) A gene-counting method of maximum likelihood for estimating gene frequencies in ABO and ABO-like systems. Annals of Human Genetics, 31, 409.
59. Young AG, Merriam HG, Warwick SI (1993) The effects of forest fragmentation on genetic variation in Acer saccharum Marsh. (sugar maple) populations. Heredity, 71, 277-289.