Teaching Negotiation Skills through Practice and Reflection with Virtual Humans

Simulation

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 685-701

  Core, Mark ^a   Traum, David ^a   Lane, H Chad ^a   Swartout, William ^a   Gratch, Jonathan ^a   Van Lent, Michael ^a   Marsella, Stacy ^b  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

conversation strategies; emotion modeling; explanation systems; intelligent tutoring systems; negotiation training; Virtual humans

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; USER INTERFACES;

CONVESATION STRATEGY; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; SIMULATION-BASED TRAINING; VIRTUAL HUMANS;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 33847320229     PISSN: 00375497     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0037549706075542     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Pertaub, D. P., M. Slater, and C. Barker. 2001. An experiment on public speaking anxiety in response to three different types of virtual audience. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11(1):68–78.
2. Cassell, J., J. Sullivan, S. Prevost, and E. Churchill E, eds. 2000. Embodied Conversational Agents. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Johnson, W. L., H. Vilhjalmsson, and S. Marsella. 2005. Serious games for language learning: How much game, how much AI? In Artificial Intelligence in Education, C. K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg, and J. Breuker, eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press. pp. 306–313.
4. McCollum, C., J. Deaton, C. Barba, T. Santerelli, M. J. Singer, and B. W. Kerr. 2004. Developing an immersive, cultural training system. In Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, FL.
5. Rosenschein, J. S., and G. Zlotkin. 1994. Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Rickel, J., S. Marsella, J. Gratch, R. Hill, D. Traum, and W. Swartout. 2002. Toward a new generation of virtual humans for interactive experiences. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17: 32–38.
7. Traum, D., J. Rickel, S. Marsella, and J. Gratch. 2003. Negotiation over tasks in hybrid human-agent teams for simulation-based training. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia. pp. 441–448.
8. Mayer, R. 2004. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist 59(1):14–19.
9. Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 41(2):75–86.
10. van Lent, M., W. Fisher, and M. Mancuso. 2004. An explainable artificial intelligence system for small-unit tactical behavior. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-04), San Jose, CA. pp. 900–907.
11. Morrison, J. E., and L. L. Meliza. 1999. Foundations of the After-Action Review Process. Arlington, VA: United United States Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. p. 42-43.
12. Rittel, H. W. J., and M. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
13. Walton, R. E., and R. B. Mckersie. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Sillars, A. L., S. F. Coletti, D. Parry, and M.A. Rogers. 1982. Coding verbal conflict tactics: Nonverbal and perceptual correlates of the avoidance-distributive-integrative distinction. Human Communication Research 9(1):83–95.
15. Putnam, L. L., and T. S. Jones. 1982. Reciprocity in negotiations:An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communications Monographs 49: 171–191.
16. Wilson, S. R., and L. L. Putnam. 1990. Interaction goals in negotiation. Communication Yearbook 13: 374–406.
17. Gratch, J., and S. Marsella. 2004. A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 5(4):269–306.
18. Scherer, K. R., A. Schorr, and T. Jonstone, eds. 2001. Appraisal Processes in Emotion, Series in Affective Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Traum, D., and J. Rickel. 2002. Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, Bologna, Italy. pp. 766–773.
20. Mao, W., and J. Gratch. 2004. Social judgement in multi-agent interactions. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York. pp. 210–217.
21. Litman, D. J., and J. F. Allen. 1987. A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversation. Cognitive Science 11: 163–200.
22. Matheson, C., M. Poesio, and D. Traum. 2000. Modelling grounding and discourse obligations using update rules. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, WA. pp. 1–8.
23. Marsella, S., D. Pynadath, and S. Read. 2004. PsychSim: Agent-based modeling of social interactions and influence. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Pittsburgh, PA. pp. 243–248.
24. Cassell, J., and Bickmore, T. 2001. A relational agent: A model and implementation of building user trust. In Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Computer-Human Interaction (CHI) Conference, Seattle, WA. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–2.
25. Katz, S., D. Allbritton, and J. Connelly. 2003. Going beyond the problem given: How human tutors use post-solution discussions to support transfer. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13: 79–116.
26. Gomboc, D., S. Solomon, M. G. Core, H. C. Lane, and M. van Lent. 2005. Design recommendations to support automated explanation and tutoring. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS05), Universal City, CA.
27. Core, M. G., H. C. Lane, M. van Lent, S. Solomon, D. Gomboc, and P. Carpenter. 2005. Toward question answering for simulations. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning for Answering Questions (KRAQ05), Edinburgh, Scotland.
28. Johnson, W. L. 1990. Understanding and debugging novice programs. Artificial Intelligence 42: 51–97.
29. Nau, D. S., Y. Cao, A. Lotem, H. M. noz Avila. 1999. SHOP: Simple hierarchical ordered planner. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI99), Stockholm, Sweden. pp. 968–973.
30. Johnson, W. L. 1994. Agents that learn to explain themselves. In Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA. pp. 1257–1263.
31. Laird, J. F., A. Newell, and P. S. Rosenbloom. 1987. Soar: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 33(1):1–64.
32. Courtemanche, A., and R. Wittman. 2002. OneSAF: A product-line approach for next-generation CGF. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Computer-Generated Forces and Behavioral Representations, Orlando, FL. pp. 349–361.
33. Swartout, W., and J. Moore. 1993. Explanation in second-generation expert systems. In Second Generation Expert Systems, J. David, J. Krivine, and R. Simmons, eds. New York: Springer. pp. 543–585.
34. Core, M. G., H. C. Lane, M. van Lent, D. Gomboc, S. Solomon, and M. Rosenberg. 2006. Building explainable artificial intelligence systems. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-06), Boston, MA.
35. Johnsen, K., R. Dickerson, A. Raij, C. Harrison, B. Lok, A. Stevens, and D. S. Lind. 2006. Evolving an immersive medical communication skills trainer. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15(1):33–46.
36. Domeshek, E. A., E. Holman, and S. Luperfoy. 2004. Discussion control in an automated socratic tutor. In Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando, FL.
37. Young, A. S., and K. A. Harper. 2005. TRACE: An ontology-based approach to generic traceability tools for human behavior models. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS05), Universal City, CA.
38. Taylor, G., K. Knudsen, and L. S. Holt. 2006. Explaining agent behavior. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS06), Baltimore, MD.
39. Traum, D. R., S. Robinson, and J. Stephan. 2004. Evaluation of multi-party virtual reality dialogue interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), Lisbon, Portugal. pp. 1699–1702.
40. deRosis, F., and F. Grasso. 2000. Affective natural language generation. In Affect in Interactions, A. Paiva, ed. Berlin: Springer.
41. Leuski, A., R. Patel, D. Traum, and B. Kennedy. 2006. Building effective question answering characters. In Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Sydney, Australia. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 18–27.