TRACE: An ontology-based approach to generic traceability tools for human behavior models

Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization - 14th Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 347-355

  Young, Andrew S ^a   Harper, Karen A ^a  

^a CHARLES RIVER ANALYTICS   (United States)

Author keywords

Human behavior model; Ontology; Traceability

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS ALGORITHMS; COURSE OF ACTION; DECISION PROCESS; DESIGN PHILOSOPHY; GAINING INSIGHTS; HUMAN BEHAVIOR MODELS; META INFORMATION; MODELING APPROACH; ONTOLOGY-BASED; TRACEABILITY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ONTOLOGY; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

TRACE ANALYSIS;

EID: 84865313327     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Allender, L., Salvi, L., & Promisel, D. (1997). Evaluation of Human Performance Under Diverse Conditions Via Modeling Technology. In Proceedings of Workshop on Emerging Technologies in Human Engineering Testing and Evaluation. Brussels, Belgium: NATO Research Study Group 24.
2. Gruber, T. R. (1993). Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Formal Ontology.
3. Hodson, D. (2003). EAAGLES Overview: PC Working Group Technical Briefing. WPAFB, OH, ASC/HPM.
4. Kogut, P., Cranefield, S., Hart, L., Dutra, M., Baclawskit, K., Kokar, M. et al. (2002). UML for Ontology Development. Knowledge Engineering Review Journal Special Issue on Ontologies in Agent Systems, 17.
5. Laird, J. E. (1987). Soar: An Architecture for General Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 1-64.
6. Lebiere, C., Anderson, J. R., & Bothell, D. (2000). Integrating Working Memory and Perception in a Dynamic Environment Using the ACT-R Architecture. In Proceedings of Symposium on Human Performance Modeling Evaluation at the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES/IEA). San Diego.
7. McGuinness, D. (2003). Ontologies for Information Fusion. In Proceedings of The 6th International Conference on Information Fusion.
8. Mulgund, S. S., Harper, K. A., Zacharias, G. L., & Menke, T. (2000). SAMPLE: Situation Awareness Model for Pilot-in-the-Loop Evaluation. In Proceedings of 9th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation. Orlando, FL.
9. Napierski, D. P., Young, A., & Harper, K. A. (2004). Towards a Common Ontology for Improved Traceability of Human Behavior Models. In Proceedings of 2004 Conference on Behavior Representations in Modeling and Simulation. Arlington, VA: SISO.
10. Pew, R. W. & Mavor, A. S. (1998). Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior: Application to Military Simulations.
11. Taylor, G., Jones, R. M., Goldstein, M., Frederiksen, R., & Robert E. Wray (2002). VISTA: A Generic Toolkit for Visualizing Agent Behavior. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavior Representation, (pp. 157-167). Orlando, FL.
12. Tor, K., Ritter, F., & Haynes, S. (2004). CaDaDis: A Tool for Displaying the Behavior of Cognitive Models and Agents. In Proceedings of Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation.