Independent coding of object motion and position revealed by distinct contingent aftereffects

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 810-817

  Bulakowski, Paul F ^a   Koldewyn, Kami ^a,b   Whitney, David ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding; Color motion asynchrony; Contingent aftereffect; Differential latency; Localization; MAE; Motion; Motion aftereffect; Perception; Spatial frequency; Texture; Vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CIRCLING BEHAVIOR; CODING; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NULL HYPOTHESIS; OSCILLATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

COLOR PERCEPTION; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; ROTATION;

EID: 33847262525     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.020     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Anstis S.M., and Cavanagh P. A minimum motion technique for judging equiluminance. In: Mollon J., and Sharpe R.T. (Eds). Color Vision: Physiology and Psychophysics (1983), Academic Press, London 155-166
2. Anstis S., and Duncan K. Separate motion aftereffects from each eye and from both eyes. Vision Research 23 2 (1983) 161-169
3. Arnold D.H., and Clifford C.W. Determinants of asynchronous processing in vision. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 269 1491 (2002) 579-583
4. Arnold D.H., Clifford C.W., and Wenderoth P. Asynchronous processing in vision: color leads motion. Current Biology 11 8 (2001) 596-600
5. Arnold D.H., Durant S., and Johnston A. Latency differences and the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 43 17 (2003) 1829-1835
6. Bartels A., and Zeki S. The theory of multistage integration in the visual brain. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 265 1412 (1998) 2327-2332
7. Bedell H.E., Chung S.T., Ogmen H., and Patel S.S. Color and motion: which is the tortoise and which is the hare?. Vision Research 43 23 (2003) 2403-2412
8. Burr D.C., and Ross J. Direct evidence that speedlines" influence motion mechanisms. The Journal of Neuroscience 22 19 (2002) 8661-8664
9. Clifford C.W., Arnold D.H., and Pearson J. A paradox of temporal perception revealed by a stimulus oscillating in colour and orientation. Vision Research 43 21 (2003) 2245-2253
10. Favreau O.E., Emerson V.F., and Corballis M.C. Motion perception: a color-contingent aftereffect. Science 176 30 (1972) 78-79
11. Fodor J.A. Modularity of Mind (1983), MIT Press, Cambridge
12. Geisler W.S. Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction. Nature 400 6739 (1999) 65-69
13. Hepler N. Color: a motion-contingent aftereffect. Science 162 851 (1968) 376-377
14. Hess R.F., and Holliday I.E. The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: effects of spatial scale and contrast. Vision Research 32 6 (1992) 1085-1097
15. Humphreys G.W. Conscious visual representations built from multiple binding processes: evidence from neuropsychology. Progress in Brain Research 142 (2003) 243-255
16. Johnston A., and Nishida S. Time perception: brain time or event time?. Current Biology 11 11 (2001) R427-R430
17. Lennie P. Single units and visual cortical organization. Perception 27 8 (1998) 889-935
18. Libet B. Neurophysiology of consciousness: Selected papers and new essays by Benjamin Libet (1993), Birkhauser, Boston
19. Livingstone M., and Hubel D. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science 240 4853 (1988) 740-749
20. Livingstone M.S., and Hubel D.H. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. The Journal of Neuroscience 7 11 (1987) 3416-3468
21. Mayhew J.E. After-effects of movement contingent on direction of gaze. Vision Research 13 4 (1973) 877-880
22. Mayhew J.E. Movement aftereffects contingent on size: evidence for movement detectors sensitive to direction of contrast. Vision Research 13 9 (1973) 1789-1795
23. Mayhew J.E.W., and Anstis S.M. Movement aftereffects contingent on color, intensity, and pattern. Perception & Psychophysics 12 (1972) 77-85
24. McGraw P.V., Whitaker D., Skillen J., and Chung S.T. Motion adaptation distorts perceived visual position. Current Biology 12 23 (2002) 2042-2047
25. Moutoussis K., and Zeki S. A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 264 1380 (1997) 393-399
26. Nishida S. Motion-based analysis of spatial patterns by the human visual system. Current Biology 14 10 (2004) 830-839
27. Nishida S., and Johnston A. Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature 397 6720 (1999) 610-612
28. Nishida S., and Johnston A. Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Current Biology 12 5 (2002) 359-368
29. Nishida S., Motoyoshi I., Andersen R.A., and Shimojo S. Gaze modulation of visual aftereffects. Vision Research 43 6 (2003) 639-649
30. Ogmen H., Patel S.S., Bedell H.E., and Camuz K. Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 44 18 (2004) 2109-2128
31. Purushothaman G., Patel S.S., Bedell H.E., and Ogmen H. Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396 6710 (1998) 424
32. Seiffert A.E., and Cavanagh P. Position-based motion perception for color and texture stimuli: effects of contrast and speed. Vision Research 39 25 (1999) 4172-4185
33. Sheth B.R., Nijhawan R., and Shimojo S. Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nature Neuroscience 3 5 (2000) 489-495
34. Snowden R.J. Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Current Biology 8 24 (1998) 1343-1345
35. Treisman A. The perception of features and objects. In: Baddeley A., and Weiskrantz L. (Eds). Attention: selection, awareness, and control (a tribute to Donald Broadbent) (1993), Clarendon Press, Oxford 5-35
36. Treisman A. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 6 2 (1996) 171-178
37. Treisman A. Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 353 1373 (1998) 1295-1306
38. van de Grind W. Physical, neural, and mental timing. Consciousness and Cognition 11 2 (2002) 241-264 discussion 308-213
39. Watanabe K., Nijhawan R., and Shimojo S. Shifts in perceived position of flashed stimuli by illusory object motion. Vision Research 42 24 (2002) 2645-2650
40. Whitaker D., McGraw P.V., and Pearson S. Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects. Vision Research 39 18 (1999) 2999-3009
41. Whitney D. The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 5 (2002) 211-216
42. Whitney D., and Cavanagh P. Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect. Perception & Psychophysics 65 7 (2003) 1011-1018
43. Whitney D., and Murakami I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience 1 8 (1998) 656-657
44. Wolfe J.M., and Cave K.R. The psychophysical evidence for a binding problem in human vision. Neuron 24 1 (1999) 11-17 111-125
45. Yandell B.S. Practical data analysis for designed experiments (1997), Chapman and Hall, New York
46. Zeki S. Localization and globalization in conscious vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (2001) 57-86
47. Zeki S., and Bartels A. The autonomy of the visual systems and the modularity of conscious vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 353 1377 (1998) 1911-1914
48. Zeki S., and Bartels A. Toward a theory of visual consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8 2 (1999) 225-259
49. Zihl J., von Cramon D., and Mai N. Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. Brain 106 Pt 2 (1983) 313-340