Motion adaptation shifts apparent position without the motion aftereffect

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 1011-1018

  Whitney, David ^a   Cavanagh, Patrick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346961119     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194830     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. ANSTIS, S. M., & REINHARDT-RUTLAND, A. H. (1976). Interactions between motion aftereffects and induced movement. Vision Research, 16, 1391-1394.
2. ASHIDA, H., SUSAMI, K., & OSAKA, N. (1996). Re-evaluation of local adaptation for motion aftereffect. Perception, 25, 1065-1072.
3. BONNET, C., & POUTHAS, V. (1972). Apparent size and duration of a movement after-effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 275-281.
4. CROPPER, S. J. (1994). Velocity discrimination in chromatic gratings and beats. Vision Research, 34, 41-48.
5. CULHAM, J. C., VERSTRATEN, F. A. J., ASHIDA, H., & CAVANAGH, P. (2000). Independent aftereffects of attention and motion. Neuron, 28, 607-615.
6. DERRINGTON, A. M., & BADCOCK, D. R. (1985). Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns? Vision Research, 25, 1869-1878.
7. DE VALOIS, R. L., & DE VALOIS, K. K. (1991). Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research, 31, 1619-1626.
8. FINNEY, D. J. (1971). Probit analysis (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. HAYES, A. (2000). Apparent position governs contour-element binding by the visual system. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 267, 1341-1345.
10. LEDGEWAY, T., & SMITH, A. T. (1994). The duration of the motion aftereffect following adaptation to first-order and second-order motion. Perception, 23, 1211-1219.
11. MASLAND, R. (1969). Visual motion perception: Experimental modification. Science, 165, 819-821.
12. MATHER, G., VERSTRATEN, F. [A. J.], & ANSTIS, S. [M.] (EDS.) (1998). The motion after-effect: A modern perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. McCARTHY, J. E. (1993). Directional adaptation effects with contrast modulated stimuli. Vision Research, 33, 2653-2662.
14. McGRAW, P. V., WHITAKER, D., SKILLEN, J., & CHUNG, S. T. (2002). Motion adaptation distorts perceived visual position. Current Biology, 12, 2042-2047.
15. MORGAN, M. J. (1980). Spatiotemporal filtering and the interpolation effect in apparent motion. Perception, 9, 161-174.
16. MOULDEN, B. (1980). After-effects and the integration of patterns of neural activity within a channel. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 290, 39-55.
17. NISHIDA, S., ASHIDA, H., & SATO, T. (1994). Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test. Vision Research, 34, 2707-2716.
18. NISHIDA, S., & JOHNSTON, A. (1999). Influence of motion signais on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature, 397, 610-612.
19. NISHIDA, S., & SATO, T. (1995). Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vision Research, 35, 477-490.
20. RAMACHANDRAN, V. S., & ANSTIS, S. M. (1990). Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges. Perception, 19, 611-616.
21. SNOWDEN, R. J. (1998). Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Current Biology, 8, 1343-1345.
22. SNOWDEN, R. J., & MILNE, A. B. (1997). Phantom motion aftereffects -evidence of detectors for the analysis of optic flow. Current Biology, 7, 717-722.
23. SPIGEL, I. M. (1960). The effects of differential post-exposure illumination on the decay of a movement after-effect. Journal of Psychology, 50, 209-210.
24. SPIGEL, I. M. (1962). Contour absence as a critical factor in the inhibition of the decay of a movement aftereffect. Journal of Psychology, 54, 221-228.
25. SPIGEL, I. M. (1964). The use of decay inhibition in an examination of central mediation in movement aftereffects. Journal of General Psychology, 70, 241-247.
26. SWANSTON, M. T., & WADE, N. J. (1992). Motion over the retina and the motion aftereffect. Perception, 21, 569-582.
27. THOMPSON, P., & WRIGHT, J. (1994). The role of intervening patterns in the storage of the movement aftereffect. Perception, 23, 1233-1240.
28. VERSTRATEN, F. A. J., FREDERICKSEN, R. E., GRÜSSER, O. J., & VAN DE GRIND, W. A. (1994). Recovery from motion adaptation is delayed by successively presented orthogonal motion. Vision Research, 34, 1149-1155.
29. VERSTRATEN, F. A. J., FREDERICKSEN, R. E., VAN WEZEL, R. J. A., LANKHEET, M. J. M., & VAN DE GRIND, W. A. (1996). Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: Evidence for two mechanisms. Vision Research, 36, 421-424.
30. VON GRÜNAU, M., & DUBÉ, S. (1992). Comparing local and remote motion aftereffects. Spatial Vision, 6, 303-314.
31. WADE, N. J. (1994). A selective history of the study of visual motion aftereffects. Perception, 23, 1111-1134.
32. WADE, N. J., SPILLMANN, L., & SWANSTON, M. T. (1996). Visual motion aftereffects: Critical adaptation and test conditions. Vision Research, 36, 2167-2175.
33. WADE, N. J., SWANSTON, M. T., & DE WEERT, C. M. (1993). On interocular transfer of motion aftereffects. Perception, 22, 1365-1380.
34. WEISSTEIN, N., MAGUIRE, W., & BERBAUM, K. (1977). A phantom-motion aftereffect. Science, 198, 955-958.
35. WHITAKER, D., McGRAW, P. V., & PEARSON, S. (1999). Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects. Vision Research, 39, 2999-3009.
36. WHITNEY, D. (2002). The influence of visual motion on perceived position. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 211-216.
37. WHITNEY, D., & CAVANAGH, P. (2000). Motion distorts visual space: Shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 954-959.
38. WOHLGEMUTH, A. (1911). On the after-effect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology, 1(Supp.), 1-117.
39. WRIGHT, M. J., & JOHNSTON, A. (1985). Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect. Vision Researches, 25, 1947-1955.
40. ZAIDI, Q., & SACHTLER, W. L. (1991). Motion adaptation from surrounding stimuli. Perception, 20, 703-714.