Finite Element Analysis Study of the Effect of Superstructure Material on Stress Distribution in an Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 19-27

  Sertgöz, Atilla ^a  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; DENTAL ALLOY;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ELASTICITY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MATERIALS TESTING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0030621894     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-848.
2. Davis DM, Rimrott R, Zarb CA. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses: Part 2. The effect of adding acrylic resin or porcelain to form the occlusal superstructure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:275-280.
3. Meijer HA, Kuiper H, Starmans FJM, Bosman F. Stress distribution around the dental implants. Influence of suprastructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:96-102.
4. Lewinstein I, Banks-Sills L, Eliasi R. Finite element analysis of a new system (IL) for supporting an implant-retained cantilever prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1995;10:355-366.
5. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 8. St Louis: Mosby, 1989:84.
6. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:165-169.
7. Lundgren D, Falk H, Laurell L. The influence of number and distribution of occlusal cantilever contacts on closing and chewing forces in dentition with implant-supported fixed prostheses occluding with complete dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:277-283.
8. Kazazoglu E, Heath MR, Müller F. A simple test for determination of the preferred chewing side. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:723-724.
9. Kamposiora H, Papavasiliou G, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Finite element analysis estimates of cement microfracture under complete veneer crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:435-441.
10. Williams KR, Watson CJ, Murphy WM, Scott J, Gregory M, Sinobad D. Finite element analysis of fixed prosthesis attached to osseointegrated implants. Quintessence Int 1990;21:563-570.
11. Ismail YH, Pahountis LN, Fleming JF. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional finite element analysis of a blade implant. Int J Oral Implant 1987;4:25-31.
12. Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Bosman F, Steen WHA. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided two implants. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:147-157.
13. Zarb GA, Jansson T. Prosthodontic procedures. In: Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985:241-282.
14. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
15. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Brånemark P-I, Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of a totally edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359.
16. Hulterström M, Nilsson U. Cobalt-chromium as a framework material in implant-supported fixed prostheses: A 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:449-454.
17. Langer B, Sullivan DY. Osseointegration: Its impact on the interrelationship of periodontics and restorative dentistry: Part II. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1989;9:165-184.
18. Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J Biomech 1975;8:393-405.
19. Cibirka RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, Stohler CS. Determining the force absorption quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:361-364.
20. Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. Biomechanical aspects of two different implant-prosthetic concepts for edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:188-198.
21. Jemt T, Lindén B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Bran̊emark implants: From prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7: 40-44.
22. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-276.
23. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutively implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:949-956.
24. Philips RW. Science of Dental Materials, ed 9. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1991:369.