Missing data imputation in breast cancer prognosis

Proceedings of the Fourth IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages 323-328

  Jerez, José M ^a   Molina, Ignacio ^a   Subirats, José L ^a   Franco, Leonardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Artificial neural networks; Breast cancer; Missing data imputation; Prognosis

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; DATA HANDLING; DATA RECORDING; DATA REDUCTION; MEDICAL COMPUTING; NEURAL NETWORKS;

BREAST CANCER; MISSING DATA IMPUTATION; PROGNOSIS; REAL DATASETS;

TUMORS;

EID: 33847242638     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. P.D. Allison. Missing data. Sage Pub., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.
2. E. Biganzoli, P. Boracchi, D. Coradini, M. Daidone, and E. Marubini. Prognosis in node-negative primary breast cancer: a neural network analysis of risk profiles using routinely assessed factors. Ann Oncol, 14:1484-1493, 2003.
3. E. Biganzoli, P. Boracchi, L. Mariani, and E. Marubini. Feed forward neural networks for the analysis of censored survival data: A partial logistic regression approach. Stat Med, 17:1169-1186, 1998.
4. P. Boracchi, E. Biganzoli, and E. Marubini. Modelling cause-specific hazards with radial basis function artificial neural networks: application to 2233 breast cancer patients. Stat Med, 20:3677-3694, 2001.
5. S. Brown, A. Branford, and W. Moran. On the use of artificial neural networks for the analysis of survival data. IEEE Trans Neu Net, 8:1071 -1077, 1997.
6. H. Burke, P. Goodman, D. Rosen, D. Henson, J. Weinstein, F. Harrel, J. Marks, D. Winchester, and D. Bostwick. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer, 79, 1997.
7. D. Cox. Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc, 34:187-202, 1972.
8. M. De Laurentis, S. De Placido, A. Bianco, G. Clark, and P. Ravdin. A prognostic model that makes quantitative estimates of probability of relapse for breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res, 5:4133-4139, 1999.
9. M. De Laurentis and P. Ravdin. A technique for using neural network analysis to perform survival analysis of censored data. Cancer Lett, 77:127-138, 1994.
10. S. Dreiseitl and L. Ohno-Machado. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. J Biomed Inf, 35:352-359, 2002.
11. Hosmer D.W. and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley, 2000.
12. B.S. Everitt. An R and S-Plus Companion to Multivariate Analysis. Springer, New York, 2005.
13. D. Faraggi, R. Simon, E. Yaskil, and A. Kramar. Bayesian neural network models for censored data. Biometrica J., 5:519-532, 1997.
14. R. Golden. Mathematical Methods for Neural Network Analysis and Design. MIT Press, 1996.
15. J. Hanley and B. McNeil. The meaning and use of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve. Radiology, 143:29-36, 1982.
16. J.G. Ibrahim, M.H. Chen, and S.R. Herring. Missing-data methods for generalised linear models: A comparative review. J Am Stat Assoc, 100(469):332-326, 2005.
17. J. Jerez, J. Górnez, G. Ramos, J. Muñoz, and E. Alba. A combined neural network and decision trees model for prognosis of breast cancer relapse. Artif Intell Med, 27:45-63, 2003.
18. J.M. Jerez, L. Franco, E. Alba, A. Llombart-Cussac, A. Lluch, N. Ribelles, B. Munrriz, and M. Martn. Improvement of breast cancer relapse prediction in high risk intervals using artificial neural networks. Br Can Res Tr, in press, 2005.
19. J.H. Jihn and J. Sedransk. Effect on secondary data analysis of common imputation methods. Soc Method, 19:213-241, 1989.
20. J. Kaiser. The effectiveness of hot-deck procedures in small samples. In Proc. Ann. Meeting of the Am. Statistical Assoc., 1983.
21. G. Kalton and D. Kasprzyk. Imputing for missing survey responses. In proceedings of the section on survey research methods, pages 22-31. Am Stat Assoc, 1982.
22. K. Liestol and P. Andersen. Updating of covariates and choice of time origin in survival analysis: problems with vaguely defined disease states. Stat Med, 21:3701-3714, 2002.
23. R.J. Little and D.B. Rubin. Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2002.
24. M. Lundin, J. Lundin, H. Burke, S. Toikkanen, Pylkken, and H. Joensuu. Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer. Oncology, 57:281-286, 1999.
25. C. Manski. Partial identification with missing data: concepts and findings. Int J Aprox Rea, 39(2-3): 151-165, 2005.
26. L. Ohno-Machado. A comparison of cox proportional hazards and artificial neural network models for medical prognosis. Comput Biol Med, 27:55-65, 1997.
27. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2005. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
28. P. Ravdin and G. Clark. A practical application of neural network analysis for predicting outcome of individual breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 22:285-293, 1992.
29. R. Ripley, A. Harris, and L. Tarassenko. Neural network models for breast cancer prognosis. Neural Comput. Appl., 7:367-375, 1998.
30. D. Rubin. Multiple imputation after +18 years. J Am Stat Assoc, 91:473-489, 1996.
31. D. Rubin. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley & Sons Inc., 2004.
32. J.L. Schafer. Missing data. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1997.
33. J.L. Schafer and J.W. Graham. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7:147-177, 2002.