Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 54, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 215-234

  Hughes, B O ^a   Carmichael, N L ^a   Walker, A W ^b   Grigor, P N ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b ADAS BOXWORTH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agonistic interactions; Domestic fowls; Large flocks; Recognition; Social structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030775699     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01177-X     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Al-Rawi, B. and Craig, J.V., 1975. Agonistic behavior of caged chickens related to group size and area per bird. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 2: 69-80.
2. Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O. and Elson, H.A., 1992. Poultry Production Systems: Behaviour, Management and Welfare. Wallingford, CAB International.
3. Banks, E.M., Wood-Gush, D.G.M., Hughes, B.O. and Mankovich, N.J., 1979. Social rank and priority of access to resources in domestic fowl. Behav. Processes, 4: 197-209.
4. Bradshaw, R.H., 1992. Conspecific discrimination and social preference in the laying hen. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 33: 69-75.
5. Candland, D.K., Taylor, D.B., Dresdale, L., Leiphart, J.M. and Solow, S.P., 1969. Heartrate, aggression and dominance in the domestic chicken. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 56: 1069-1073.
6. Craig, J.V. and Bhagwat, A.L., 1974. Agonistic and mating behavior of adult chickens modified by social and physical environments. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 1: 57-65.
7. Craig, J.V. and Guhl, A.M., 1969. Territorial behaviour and social interactions of pullets kept in large flocks. Poult. Sci., 48: 1622-1628.
8. Craig, J.V., Biswas, D.K. and Guhl, A.M., 1969. Agonistic behaviour influenced by strangeness, crowding and heredity in female domestic fowl (Gallus gallus). Anim. Behav., 17: 498-506.
9. Dawkins, M.S., 1982. Elusive concept of preferred group size in domestic hens. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 8: 365-376.
10. Douglis, M.B., 1948. Social factors influencing the hierarchies of the domestic hen: interactions between residents and part-time members of organized flocks. Physiol. Zool., 21: 147-182.
11. Freire, R., 1995. Variation in pre-laying behaviour of hens: implications for control and motivation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
12. Genstat, 1993. Procedure Library Manual Release 3(1). Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station.
13. Grigor, P.N., 1993. Use of space by laying hens: social and environmental implications for free range systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
14. Grigor, P.N., Hughes, B.O. and Appleby, M.C., 1995. Social inhibition of movement in domestic hens. Anim. Behav., 49: 1381-1388.
15. Guhl, A.M., 1953. Social behaviour of the domestic fowl. Tech. Bull. Kans. Agric. Exp. Stn., 73: 1-48.
16. Hansen, I., 1994. Behavioural expression of laying hens in aviaries and cages: frequencies, time budgets and facility utilisation. Br. Poult. Sci., 35: 491-508.
17. Hughes, B.O., 1977. Selection of group size by individual laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci., 18: 9-18.
18. Hughes, B.O. and Wood-Gush, D.G.M., 1977. Agonistic behaviour in domestic hens: the influence of housing method and group size. Anim. Behav., 25: 1056-1062.
19. Hughes, B.O., Wood-Gush, D.G.M. and Morley Jones, R., 1974. Spatial organization in flocks of domestic fowls. Anim. Behav., 22: 438-445.
20. Jenner, T.D., 1995. Environmental effects on the behaviour of laying hens: spacing and space restrictions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.
21. Keeling, L.J. and Savenije, B., 1995. Flocks of commercial hens: organised groups or collections of individuals? In: Proceedings of the 29th Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology. Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, Potters Bar, pp. 187-188.
22. King, M.G., 1965. The effect of social context on dominance capacity of domestic hens. Anim. Behav., 13: 132-133.
23. Martin, P. and Bateson, P.P.G., 1986. Measuring Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. McBride, G., 1958. The measurement of aggressiveness in the domestic hen. Anim. Behav., 6: 87-91.
25. McBride, G., 1964. Social discrimination and subflock structure in the domestic fowl. Anim. Behav., 12: 264-267.
26. McBride, G., 1970. The social control of behaviour in fowls. In: B.M. Freeman and R.F. Gordon (Editors), Aspects of Poultry Behaviour. British Poultry Science, Edinburgh, pp. 3-13.
27. McBride, G. and Foenander, F., 1962. Territorial behaviour in flocks of domestic fowl. Nature, 194: 102.
28. McBride. G., Parer, I.P. and Foenander, F., 1969. The social organisation and behaviour of the feral domestic fowl. Anim. Behav. Monogr., 2(3): 127-181.
29. McLean, K.A., Baxter, M.R. and Michie, W., 1986. A comparison of the welfare of laying hens in battery cages and in a perchery. Res. Dev. Agric., 3: 93-98.
30. O'Keefe, T.R., Graves, H.B. and Siegel, H.S., 1988. Social organisation in caged layers: the peck order revisited. Poult. Sci., 67: 1008-1014.
31. Polley, C.R., Craig, J.V. and Bhagwat, A.L., 1974. Crowding and agonistic behavior: a curvilinear relationship. Poult. Sci., 53: 1621-1623.
32. Siegel, H.S. and Siegel, P.B., 1961. The relationship of social competition with endocrine weights and activity in male chickens. Anim. Behav., 9: 151-158.
33. Widowski, T.M. and Duncan, I.J.H., 1994. Do domestic fowls form groups when resources are unlimited? In: Proceedings of the 28th Congress of the International Society for Animal Ethology. ISAE, Foulum, Denmark, p. 141.
34. Williams, G.C., Siegel, P.B. and Gross, W.B., 1977. Social strife in cockerel flocks during the formation of peck rights. Appl. Anim. Ethol., 3: 35-45.