Chickens use visual cues in social discrimination: An experiment with coloured lighting

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 62, Issue 2-3, 1999, Pages 233-242

  D'Eath, R B ^a   Stone, R J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agonistic behaviour; Chicken social behavioural; Light; Recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033557209     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00216-0     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allee W.C., Collias N.E., Lutherman C.Z. Modification of the social order in flocks of hens by the injection of testosterone propionate. Physiol. Zool. 12:1939;412-440.
2. Appleby, M.C., Hughes, B.O., Elson, H.A., 1992. Poultry production systems: behaviour, management and welfare, C.A.B International.
3. Boshouwers F.M.G., Nicaise E. Artificial light sources and their influence on physical activity and energy expenditure of laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:1993;11-19.
4. Bradshaw R.H. Conspecific discrimination and social preference in the laying hen. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 33:1992;69-75.
5. Bradshaw R.H., Dawkins M.S. Slides of conspecifics as representatives of real animals in laying hens (Gallus domesticus). Behav. Proc. 28:1993;165-172.
6. Candland D.S. Discriminability of facial regions used by the domestic chicken in maintaining the social dominance order. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 69:1969;281-285.
7. Craig J.V., Biswas D.K., Guhl A.M. Agonistic behaviour influenced by strangeness, crowding and heredity in female domestic fowl (Gallus gallus). Anim. Behav. 17:1969;498-506.
8. Dawkins M.S. From an animal's point of view: motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behav. Brain. Sci. 13:1990;1-61.
9. Dawkins M.S. How do hens view other hens? The use of lateral and binocular visual fields in social recognition. Behaviour. 132:1995;591-606.
10. Dawkins M.S. Distance and social recognition in hens: implications for the use of photographs as social stimuli. Behaviour. 133:1996;1-18.
11. D'Eath, R.B., 1996. Social recognition of flockmates in laying hens. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, UK.
12. D'Eath R.B., Dawkins M.S. Laying hens do not discriminate between video images of conspecifics. Anim. Behav. 52:1996;903-912.
13. Guhl A.M. Social inertia and social stability in chickens. Anim. Behav. 16:1968;219-232.
14. Guhl A.M., Allee W.C. Some measurable effects of social organisation in flocks of hens. Physiol. Zool. 17:1944;320-347.
15. Guhl A.M., Ortman L.L. Visual patterns in the recognition of individuals among chickens. Condor. 55:1953;287-298.
16. Harrison P., McGinnis J., Schumaier G., Lauber J. Sexual maturity and subsequent reproductive performance of white leghorn chickens subjected to different parts of the light spectrum. Poult. Sci. 48:1969;878-883.
17. Maier R.A. The role of the dominance-submission ritual in social recognition of hens. Anim. Behav. 12:1964;59.
18. Manser C.E. Effects of lighting on the welfare of domestic poultry: a review. Anim. Welfare. 5:1996;341-360.
19. McGinnis, J., 1967. Effect of colored lights on growing pullets and laying hens. Pacific Poultryman, 24-44.
20. Milinski M., Bakker T.C.M. Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitised males. Nature. 344:1990;330-333.
21. Newberry R.C., Hunt J.R., Gardiner E.E. Influence of light intensity on behavior and performance of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 67:1988;1020-1025.
22. Nicol, C.J., 1997. Environmental choices of farm animals. In: Forbes, J.M., Lawrence, T.L.J., Rodway, R.G., Varley, M.A. (Eds.), Animal Choices. Occasional Publication No. 20 BSAS, pp. 35-43.
23. North, M.O., Bell, D.D., 1990. Commercial Chicken Production Manual, 4th edn. Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York.
24. Nuboer, J.F.W., 1993. Visual ecology in poultry houses. In: Savory, C.J., Hughes, B.O. (Eds.), Proceedings IVth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, pp. 39-44.
25. Nuboer J.F.W., Coemans M.A.J.M., Vos J.J. Artificial lighting in poultry houses: are photometric units appropriate for describing illumination intensities? Br. Poult. Sci. 33:1992;135-140.
26. Prayitno D.S., Phillips C.J.C. Equating the perceived intensity of coloured light to hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 38:1997;136-141.
27. Pyrzak R., Snapir N., Goodman G., Perek M. The effect of light wavelength on the production and quality of eggs of the domestic hen. Theriogenology. 28:1987;947-960.
28. Ryan C.M.E. Concept formation and individual recognition in the domestic chicken. Behav. Anal. Lett. 2:1982;213-220.
29. Schumaier G., Harrison P.C., McGinnis J. Effect of colored fluorescent light on growth, cannibalism, and subsequent egg production of single comb white leghorn pullets. Poult. Sci. 47:1968;1599-1602.
30. Williams C., McGibbon W.H. An analysis of the peck-order of the female domestic fowl Gallus domesticus. Poult. Sci. 35:1956;969-976.
31. Wood-Gush, D.G.M., 1971. The Behaviour of the Domestic Fowl. Heinemann, London.