Cue combination and the effect of horizontal disparity and perspective on stereoacuity

Spatial Vision

Volumn 20, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 107-138

  Zalevski, Anna M ^a   Bruce Henning, G ^b   Hill, N Jeremy ^c  

^a Department of Experimental Psychology ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Experimental Psychology   (United Kingdom)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cue combination; Stereoacuity

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL TESTS;

CUE COMBINATION; CUE WEIGHTING; STEREOACUITY;

DEPTH PERCEPTION;

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

CUES; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 33847084652     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856807779369706     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allison, R. S. and Howard, I. P. (2000). Temporal dependencies in resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception, Vision Research 40, 1869-1885.
2. Andersen, E. E. and Weymouth, F. W. (1923). Visual perception and the retinal mosaic: I. Retinal mean local sign: an explanation of the fineness of binocular perception of distance, Amer. J. Phys. 64, 561-594.
3. Backus, B. T. and Banks, M. S. (1999). Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception, Perception 28, 217-242.
4. Berry, R. N. (1948). Quantitative relations among Vernier, real depth, and stereoscopic depth acuities, J. Exper. Psych. 38, 708-721.
5. Bourdon, B. (1900). L'acuité steréoscopique, Revue Philosophique 49, 74-78.
6. van Ee, R. and Erkelens, C. J. (1998). Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception: an evaluation and extension of Howard and Keneko's theory, Vision Research 38, 3871-3882.
7. van Ee, R., Banks, M. S. and Backus, B. T. (1999). An analysis of binocular slant contrast, Perception 28, 1121-1145.
8. van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C. J. and Erkelens, C. J. (2002). Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants, Journal of Vision 2, 597-607.
9. van Ee, R., Adams, W. J. and Mamassian, P. (2003). Bayesian modelling of perceived slant in bi-stable stereoscopic perception, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 20, 1398-1406.
10. Epstein, W. (1966). Perceived depth as a function of relative height under three background conditions, J. Exper. Psychol. 72, 335-338.
11. Epstein, W. and Landauer, A. H. (1969). Size and distance judgments under reduced conditions of viewing, Perception and Psychophysics 6, 169-272.
12. Ernst, M. O. and Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion, Nature 415, 429-433.
13. Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S. and Bülthoff, H. H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception, Nature Neuroscience 3, 69-73.
14. Gillam, B. (1968). Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses, J. Exper. Psychol. 78, 299-305.
15. Gillam, B. and Ryan, C. (1992). Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception, Perception 21, 427-439.
16. Gillam, B. and Ryan, C. (1993). Stereoscopic slant reversals: a new kind of 'induced' effect, Perception 22, 1025-1036.
17. Gogel, W. C. (1969). The absolute and relative size cues to distance, Amer. J. Psychol. 82, 228-234.
18. Green, D. M. and S wets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Wiley, New York.
19. Hillis, J. M., Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S. and Landy, M. S. (2002). Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses, Science 298, 1627-1630.
20. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S. and Banks, M. S. (2006). Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination, Journal of Vision 4, 967-992.
21. Howard, H. J. (1919). A test for the judgment of distance, Amer. J. Ophthalmol. 2, 656-675.
22. Howard, I. P. (2002). Depth perception, in: Stevens Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Pashler, H. and Yantis, S. (Eds), Vol. VI, pp. 77-120. Wiley, New York.
23. Jacobs, R. A. (1999). Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth, Vision Research 39, 3621-3629.
24. Knill, D. C. and Saunders, J. (1999). Humans optimally weight stereo and texture cues to estimate surface slant, Journal of Vision 2, 3621-3629.
25. Knill, D. C. and Saunders, J. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant, Vision Research 43, 2539-2558.
26. Kumar, T. and Glaser, D. A. (1992). Shape analysis and stereopsis for human depth perception, Vision Research 32, 499-512.
27. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnson, E. B. and Young, M. (1995). Measurement and the modelling of depth cue combination: in defence of weak fusion, Vision Research 35, 389-412.
28. McKee, S. P. (1983). The spatial requirements for fine stereoacuity, Vision Research 23, 191-198.
29. Mitchison, G. J. and Westheimer, G. (1984). The perception of depth in simple figures, Vision Research 24, 1063-1073.
30. Ogle, K. N. (1953). Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth perception from double images, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 43, 906-913.
31. Ono, H. (1967). Difference threshold for stimulus length under simultaneous and nonsimultaneous viewing conditions, Perception and Psychophysics 2, 201-207.
32. Oruç, I., Maloney, L. T. and Landy, M. S. (2003). Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error, Vision Research 43, 2451-2468.
33. Papoulis, A. and Pillai, S. U. (2002). Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, Boston.
34. Richards, W. (1970). Stereopsis and stereoblindness, Experimental Brain Research 10, 380-388.
35. Richards, W. (1971). Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 61, 410-414.
36. Rosas, P., Wichmann, F. A. and Wagemans, J. (2004). Some observations on the effects of slant and texture type on slant-from-texture, Vision Research 44, 1511-1535.
37. Rosas, P., Wagemans, J., Ernst, M. O. and Wichmann, F. A. (2005). Texture and haptic cues in slant discrimination: reliability-based cue weighting without statistically optimal cue combination, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 22, 801-809.
38. Ryan, C. and Gillam, B. (1994). Cue conflict and stereoscopic surface slant about horizontal and vertical axes, Perception 23, 645-658.
39. Sato, M. and Howard, I. P. (2001). Effects of disparity-perspective cue conflict on depth contrast, Vision Research 41, 415-426.
40. Schlosberg, H. (1950). A note on depth perception, size constancy, and related topics, Psychol. Rev. 57, 314-317.
41. Sivia, D. S. (1996). Data Analysis: A Bayesian Tutorial, 1st edition. The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
42. Stevens, K. A. and Brookes, A. (1988). Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces, Vision Research 28, 371-386.
43. Strang, G. (1988). Linear Algebra and Its Applications. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San Diego, CA.
44. Vollmerhausen, R. H. and Daggers, R. G. (2000). Analysis of Sampled Imaging Systems. SPIE Press, Washington, DC.
45. Werner, H. (1937). Dynamics in binocular depth perception, Psychological Monographs 49, 1-127.
46. Westheimer, G. (1979). The spatial sense of the eye, Ivestig. Ophthalmol. Visual Science 18, 893-912.
47. Westheimer, G. and McKee, S. P. (1978). Stereoscopic acuity for moving retinal images, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 68, 450-455.
48. Wichmann, F. A. and Hill, N. J. (2001a). The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness-of-fit, Perception and Psychophysics 63, 1293-1313.
49. Wichmann, F. A. and Hill, N. J. (2001b). The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling, Perception and Psychophysics 63, 1314-1329.
50. Young, M. J., Landy, M. S. and Maloney, L. T. (1993). A perturbation analyssis of deppth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues, Vision Research 33, 2685-2696.
51. Youngs, W. M. (1976). The influence of perspective and disparity cues on the perception of slant, Vision Research 16, 79-82.
52. Zalevski, A. M. (2004). Some determinants of the loss in relative depth with closed configurations. D.Phil, thesis, Oxford.