Temporal dependencies in resolving monocular and binocular cue conflict in slant perception

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 14, 2000, Pages 1869-1885

  Allison, R S ^a   Howard, I P ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cue interaction; Inclination; Perspective; Slant; Stereopsis; Temporal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0034077299     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00034-1     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Allison R.S., Howard I.P., Rogers B.J., Bridge H. Temporal aspects of slant and inclination perception. Perception. 27:1998;1287-1304.
2. Andersen G.J., Braunstein M.L., Saidpour A. The perception of depth and slant from texture in three dimensional scenes. Perception. 27:1998;1087-1106.
3. Anstis S.M., Howard I.P., Rogers B. A Craik-Cornsweet illusion for visual depth. Vision Research. 18:1978;213-217.
4. Backus B.T., Banks M.S. Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception. 28:1999;217-242.
5. Banks M., Backus B. Extra-retinal and perspective cues cause the small range of the induced effect. Vision Research. 38:1998;187-194.
6. Braunstein M.L. Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 78:1968;247-253.
7. Braunstein M.L., Andersen G.J. Shape and depth perception from parallel projections of three-dimensional motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance. 10:1984;749-760.
8. Brookes A., Stevens K.A. The analogy between stereo depth and brightness. Perception. 18:1989;601-614.
9. Buckley D., Frisby J.P. Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges. Vision Research. 33:1993;919-933.
10. Bülthoff H.H., Mallot H.A. Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading. Journal of Optical Society of America, A. 5:1988;1749-1757.
11. Cutting J.E., Millard R.T. Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 113:1984;198-216.
12. Dosher B.A., Sperling G., Wurst S.A. Tradeoffs between stereopsis and proximity luminance covariance as determinants of perceived 3D structure. Vision Research. 26:1986;973-990.
13. Epstein W., Morgan-Paap C.L. The effect of level of depth processing and degree of informational discrepancy on adaptation to uniocular image magnification. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 102:1974;585-594.
14. Frisby J.P., Buckley D., Wishart K.A., Porril J., Gårding J., Mayhew J.E.W. Interaction of stereo and texture cues in the perception of three-dimensional steps. Vision Research. 35:1995;1463-1472.
15. Gibson J. The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology. 63:1950;367-384.
16. Gibson J., Gibson E. Continuous perspective transformation and the perception of rigid motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 54:1957;129-138.
17. Gillam B. Changes in the direction of induced aniseikonic slant as a function of distance. Vision Research. 7:1967;777-783.
18. Gillam B. Perception of slant when perspective and stereopsis conflict: experiments with aniseikonic lenses. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 78:1968;299-305.
19. Gillam B. Stereoscopic slant reversals: a new kind of 'induced' effect. Perception. 22:1993;1025-1036.
20. Gillam B, Lawergren B. The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory. Perception and Psychophysics. 34:1983;121-130.
21. Gillam B., Ryan C. Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception. 21:1992;427-439.
22. Gillam B., Flagg T., Finlay D. Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing. Perception and Psychophysics. 36:1984;559-564.
23. Gillam B., Chambers D., Russo T. Postfusional latency in slant perception and the primitives of stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 14:1988;163-175.
24. Howard I.P., Kaneko H. Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination. Vision Research. 34:1994;2505-2517.
25. Howard I.P., Rogers B.J. Binocular vision and stereopsis. 1995;Oxford University Press, New York.
26. Johnston E.B., Cumming B.G., Parker A.J. Integration of depth modules: stereopsis and texture. Vision Research. 33:1993;813-826.
27. Julesz B. Foundations of cyclopean perception. 1971;University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Kaneko H., Howard I.P. Relative size disparities and the perception of surface slant. Vision Research. 36:1996;1919-1930.
29. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., Young M.J. Measurement and modelling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Research. 35:1995;389-412.
30. Mayhew J., Longuet-Higgins H.C. A computational model of binocular depth perception. Nature. 297:1982;376-378.
31. Mitchison G.J., McKee S.P. Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception. Vision Research. 30:1990;1781-1791.
32. Mitchison G.J., Westheimer G. Viewing geometry and gradients of horizontal disparity. Blakemore C. Vision: coding and efficiency. 1990;302-309 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Ogle K.N. Induced size effect. I.A new phenomenon in binocular space-perception associated with the relative sizes of the images of the two eyes. AMA Archives of Ophthalmology. 20:1938;604-623.
34. Ono M.E., Rivest J., Ono H. Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 12:1986;331-337.
35. Oyama T. Perceived size and perceived distance in stereoscopic vision and an analysis of their causal relations. Perception and Psychophysics. 16:1974;175-181.
36. Regan D., Beverley K.I. Some dynamic features of depth perception. Vision Research. 13:1973;2369-2379.
37. Rogers B.J., Bradshaw M.F. Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis. Nature. 361:1993;253-255.
38. Rogers B.J., Graham M.E. Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research. 22:1982;216-270.
39. Ryan C., Gillam B. Cue conflict and stereoscopic surface slant about horizontal and vertical axes. Perception. 23:1994;645-658.
40. Ullman, S. (1979) The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge: MIT Press.
41. Sedgewick H.A. Space perception. Boff K.R., Kaufman L., Thomas J.P. Handbook of human perception and performance, ch. 21. 1986;1-57 Wiley, New York.
42. Stevens K.A. Slant-tilt: the visual encoding of surface orientation. Biological Cybernetics. 46:1983;183-195.
43. Stevens K.A., Brookes A. Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces. Vision Research. 28:1988;371-386.
44. Stevens K.A., Lees M., Brookes A. Combining binocular and monocular curvature features. Perception. 20:1991;425-440.
45. Ullman S. The interpretation of visual motion. 1979;MIT Press, Cambridge.
46. Van Ee R., Erkelens C.J. Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception. Vision Research. 36:1996;45-51.
47. Van Ee R., Erkelens C.J. Anisotropy in Werner's Binocular Depth-contrast effect. Vision Research. 36:1996;2253-2262.
48. Van Ee R., Erkelens C.J. Temporal aspects of stereoscopic slant estimation: an evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory. Vision Research. 38:1998;3871-3882.
49. Van Ee R., Erkelens C.J. The influence of large scanning eye movements on stereoscopic slant estimation of large surfaces. Vision Research. 39:1999;467-479.
50. Wallach H., Bacon J. Two forms of retinal disparity. Perception and Psychophysics. 19:1976;375-382.
51. Wallach H., O'Connell D. The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 45:1953;205-217.
52. Young M.J., Landy M.S., Maloney L.T. A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Research. 33:1993;2685-2696.
53. Youngs W.M. The influence of perspective and disparity cues on the perception of slant. Vision Research. 16:1976;79-82.