University tutors' practicum observation notes: Format and content

Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 233-252

  Bunton, David ^a   Stimpson, Philip ^a   Lopez Real, Francis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847057066     PISSN: 13611267     EISSN: 14699745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1361126022000037060     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AUSTIN, J.L., 1962. How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. CAMERON-JONES, M., and O'HARA, P., 1995. Mentors' perceptions of their roles with students in initial teacher training. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(2): 189–199.
3. GEEN, A., 2001. Debriefing student teachers: improving current practice. Teacher Development, 5(1): 25–38.
4. GLENWRIGHT, P., 1999. The discourse of written teaching practice supervision reports: linking language and methodology. Asia Pacific Journal of Language in Education, 2(2): 57–87.
5. HOBSON, A.J., 2002. Student teachers' perceptions of school-based mentoring in initial teacher training (ITT). Mentoring & Tutoring, 10(1): 5–20.
6. HOLLAND, P.E., 1989. Implicit assumptions about the supervisory conference: a review and analysis of literature. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(4): 362–379.
7. HOPPER, B., 2001. The role of the HEI tutor in initial teacher education school-based placements. Mentoring & Tutoring, 9(3): 211–222.
8. JOHN, P.D., 2001. Winning and losing: a case study of university tutor-student teacher interaction during a school-based practicum. Mentoring & Tutoring, 9(2): 153–168.
9. JOHN, P.D., and GILCHRIST, I., 1999. Flying solo: understanding the post-lesson dialogue between student teacher and mentor. Mentoring and Tutoring, 7(2): 101–111.
10. LOMBARDI, J., 2001. Supervision of student teachers: emerging models and innovative approaches in the USA. Teacher Development, 5(3): 309–321.
11. PARKINSON, B., and DAVIES, S., 1994. “ Peer observation and post-lesson discussion ”. In Language in a Changing Europe (Clevedon, BAAL and Multilingual Matters) Edited by: GRADDOL, D., and THOMAS, S., 73–82.
12. RIKARD, G.L., and VEAL, M.L., 1996. Co-operating teachers: insight into their preparation, beliefs and practices. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 15(3): 279–296.
13. ROBERTS, J., 1992. Face-threatening acts and politeness theory: contrasting speeches from supervisory conferences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(3): 287–301.
14. ROBERTS, J., 1994. Discourse analysis of supervisory conferences: an exploration. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(2): 136–154.
15. SAUNDERS, S., PETTINGER, K., and TOMLISON, P., 1995. Prospective mentors' views on partnership in teacher training. British Educational Research Journal, 21(2): 199–217.
16. SEARLE, J., 1969. Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. SPEAR, M., LOCK, N.D., and MCCULLOCH, M., 1997. The written feedback mentors give to student teachers. Teacher Development, 1(2): 269–280.
18. STIMPSON, P., LOPEZ-REAL, F., BUNTON, D., CHAN, D., SIVAN, A., and WILLIAMS, M., 2000. Better Supervision, Better Teaching, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
19. WAITE, D., 1992. Supervisors' talk: making sense of conferences from an anthropological linguistic perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(4): 349–371.
20. WILLIAMS, E.A., BUTT, G.W., GRAY, C., LEACH, S., MARR, A., and SOARES, A., 1998. Mentors' use of dialogue within a secondary initial teacher education partnership. Educational Review, 50(3): 225–239.
21. ZEICHNER, K.M., LISTON, D.P., MAHLIOS, M., and GOMEZ, M., 1988. The structure and goals of a student teaching program and the character and quality of supervisory discourse. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4(4): 349–362.