Comparative analysis of torsional and bending stresses in two mathematical models of nickel-titanium rotary instruments: ProTaper versus ProFile

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 15-19

  Berutti, Elio ^a,b   Chiandussi, Giorgio ^a   Gaviglio, Ivan ^a   Ibba, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ELASTICITY; ENDODONTICS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; THEORETICAL MODEL; TORQUE;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NICKEL; PLIABILITY; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM; TORQUE;

EID: 0038137043     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200301000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Walia H, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endodon 1988;14:346-51.
2. Camps JJ, Pertot WJ. Torsional and stiffness properties of nickel-titanium K-files. Int Endod J 1995;28:239-43.
3. Glosson CR, Hallor RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine driven and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endodon 1995;21:146-51.
4. Schäfer E. Root canal instruments for manual use: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol 1997;13:51-64.
5. Serene TP, Adams JD, Saxena A. Nickel-titanium instruments applications in endodontics. St. Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, 1995.
6. Camps JJ, Pertot WJ, Levallois B. Relationship between file size and stiffness of nickel titanium instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;11:270-3.
7. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL. The finite element method. London: McGraw-Hill, 1989.
8. Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
9. Wang FE, Pickart SJ, Alperia HA. Mechanism of the TiNi martensitic transformation and the crystal structures of TiNi-II and TiNi-III phases. J Appl Phys 1972;43:97-112.
10. Otsuka K, Shimuzi K. Pseudoelasticity and shape memory effects in alloy. Int Met Rev 1986;31:93-114.
11. Wayman CM. Shape memory alloys. Materials Res Soc Bull 1993;18:49-56.
12. Walia H, Costas J, Brantley W, Gerstein H. Torsional ductility and cutting efficiency of the Nitinol file [Abstract]. J Endodon 1989;15:174.
13. Andreasen GF, Morrow RE. Laboratory and clinical analyses of Nitinol wire. Am J Orthod 1978;73:142-51.
14. Thompson SA. An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry. Int Endod J 2000;33:297-310.
15. Hodgson DE, Wu MH, Bierman RJ. Shape memory alloys. In: Davis JR, ed. Metals handbook. vol. 2, Properties and selection: nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 1990.
16. Kavanagh D, Lumley PJ. An in vitro evaluation of canal preparations using ProFile 0.04 and 0.06 taper instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998;14:16-20.
17. Bryant ST, Dummer PMH, Pitoni C, Bourba M, Moghal S. Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canal. Int Endod J 1999;32:155-64.
18. Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Vulcain JM. Impact of two theoretical cross-sections on torsional and bending stresses of nickel-titanium root canal instrument models. J Endodon 2000;26:414-7.
19. Turpin YL, Chagneau F, Bartier O, Cathelimeau G, Vulcain JM. Impact of torsional and bending inertia on root canal instruments. J Endodon 2001;27:333-6.
20. Machtou P, Martin D. Utilisation raisonnée des ProFile. Clinic 1997;18:253-9.