Ductal carcinoma in situ: Computer-aided detection in screening mammography

Radiology

Volumn 241, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 689-694

  Pai, Vidya R ^a   Gregory, Nancy E ^a   Swinford, Ann E ^a   Rebner, Murray ^a  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COMPUTER AIDED DETECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING TEST;

BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33846672965     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413051366     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:687-693.
2. Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, et al. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 2003;228:851-856.
3. Astley SM, Gilbert FJ. Computer-aided detection in mammography. Clin Radiol 2004;59:390-399.
4. Quek ST, Thng CH, Khoo JBK, Koh WL. Radiologists' detection of mammographic abnormalities with and without a computer-aided detection system. Australas Radiol 2003;47:257-260.
5. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi JD, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554-562.
6. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-786.
7. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Burke P, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1645-1649.
8. Ho WT, Lam PW. Clinical performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in detecting carcinoma in breasts of different densities. Clin Radiol 2003;58:133-136.
9. Taylor CG, Champness J, Reddy M, Taylor P, Potts HW, Given-Wilson R. Reproducibility of prompts in computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer. Clin Radiol 2003;58:733-738.
10. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001;219:192-202.
11. Zheng B, Ganott A, Britton CA, et al. Soft-copy mammographic readings with different computer-assisted detection cuing environments: preliminary findings. Radiology 2001;221:633-640.
12. Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Scott Soo M. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1083-1088.
13. Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, Willison KM. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? initial experience. Radiology 2004;232:578-584.
14. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study. Clin Radiol 2001;56:150-154.
15. Karssemeijer N, Otten JDM, Verbeek AL, et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003;227:192-200.
16. Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Brenner RJ. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology 2004;230:811-819.
17. D'Orsi CJ. Computer-aided detection: there is no free lunch [editorial]. Radiology 2001;221:585-586.
18. Petrick N, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Helvie MA, Paquerault S, Hadjiiski LM. Breast cancer detection: evaluation of a mass-detection algorithm for computer-aided diagnosis-experience in 263 patients. Radiology 2002;224:217-224.
19. Zheng B, Hardesty LA, Poller WR, Sumkin JH, Golla S. Mammography with computer-aided detection: reproducibility assessment-initial experience. Radiology 2003;228:58-62.
20. Vyborny CJ, Doi T, O'Shaughnessy KF, Romsdahl HM, Schneider AC, Stein AA. Breast cancer: importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection. Radiology 2000;215:703-707.
21. Evans WP, Warren Burhenne LJ, Laurie L, O'Shaughnessy KF, Castellino RA. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic characteristics and computer-aided detection. Radiology 2002;225:182-189.