Breast cancer: Importance of spiculation in computer-aided detection

Radiology

Volumn 215, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 703-707

  Vyborny, Carl J ^a   Doi, Takeshi ^b   O'Shaughnessy, Kathryn F ^b   Romsdahl, Harlan M ^b   Schneider, Alexander C ^b   Stein, Alan A ^b  

^a Dept of Radiol LaGrange Mem Hosp ^*  (United States)

^b R2 Technology Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Breast neoplasms, diagnosis; Cancer screening; Computers, diagnostic aid

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST;

EID: 0034038706     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn38703     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Sickles, EA. Breast masses: mammographic evaluation. Radiology 1989; 173:297-303.
2. D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. Mammographic feature analysis. Semin Roentgenol 1993; 28:204-230.
3. Tabar L, Dean PB. Teaching atlas of mammography. 2nd ed. Stuttgart, Germany: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1985; 15-136.
4. Franquet T. Spiculated lesions of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:841-852.
5. Kopans DB. Analyzing the mammogram. In: Breast imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1998; 302-304.
6. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617.
7. Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson ARM, et al. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognostic factors. Radiology 1996; 199:811-817.
8. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 111 missed cancers later detected by screening mammography (abstr). Radiology 1999; 213(P):240.
9. Kegelmeyer WP, Pruneda JM, Bourland PD, Hillis A, Riggs MW, Nipper, ML. Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. Radiology 1994; 191: 331-337.
10. Parr T, Astley S, Boggis C. The detection of stellate lesions in digital mammograms. In: Gale AG, Astley SM, Dance DR, Cairns AY, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1994; 231-239.
11. Karssemeijer N. Recognition of stellate lesions in digital mammograms. In: Gale AG, Astley SM, Dance DR, Cairns AY, eds. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1994; 211-219.
12. Zhang M, Giger ML. Automated detection of spiculated lesions and architectural distortions in digitized mammograms. In: Loew MH, ed. Proceedings of medical imaging 1995: image processing. Vol 2434. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE, 1995; 846-854.
13. te Brake GM, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. Radiology 1998; 207:465-471.
14. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection in the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215: 554-562.
15. American College of Radiology. Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998; 167-175.
16. Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 146:661-663.
17. Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999; 211:845-850.
18. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166:773-778.
19. Harvey JA, Fajardo LL, Innis CA. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:1167-1172.
20. Schmidt RA, Nishikawa RM, Osnis RB, Schreibman KL, Giger ML, Doi K. Computerized detection of lesions missed by mammography. In: Doi K, Giger ML, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, eds. Digital mammography '96. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science, 1997; 105-110.
21. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996; 276:33-38.