Radiologists' detection of mammographic abnormalities with and without a computer-aided detection system

Australasian Radiology

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 257-260

  Quek, S T ^a   Thng, C H ^a   Khoo, J B K ^a   Koh, W L ^a  

^a DIVISION OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Breast; Computer aided detection; Mammogram; Mass; Microcalcifications

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST LESION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0141539578     PISSN: 00048461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2003.01173.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Chia KS, Seow A, Lee HP, Shanmugaratnam K. Cancer Incidence in Singapore 1993-97. Singapore Cancer Registry, Singapore, 2000.
2. Feig SA. Increased benefit from shorter screening mammography intervals for women ages 40-49 years. Cancer 1997; 80: 2035-9.
3. Feig SA, D'Orsi CJ, Hendrick RE et al. American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171: 29-33.
4. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Chen HH et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results from the Swedish Two-County Trial. Cancer 1995; 75: 2507-17.
5. Asbury D, Boggis CR, Sheals D, Threlfall AG, Woodman CB. NHS breast screening programme: is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable? Br Med J 1996; 313: 1369-70.
6. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994; 191: 241-4.
7. Anderson ED, Muir BB, Walsh JS, Kirkpatrick AE. The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. Clin Radiol 1994; 49: 248-51.
8. Warren RM, Duffy SW. Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. Br J Radiol 1995; 68: 958-62.
9. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 150-54.
10. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219: 192-202.
11. Roehrig J, Castellino RA. The promise of computer aided detection in digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 1999; 31: 35-9.
12. Field S. Breast screeening issues - a study on workforce, funding, ligitation and morale in the NHS Breast Screening Programme. Newsl R Coll Radiol 1998; 54: 12-14.
13. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215: 554-62.
14. Garvican L, Field S. A pilot evaluation of the R2 image checker system and users' response in the detection of interval breast cancers on previous screeening films. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 833-7.