Assistive technology in the reading clinic: Its emerging potential

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 140-145

  McKenna, Michael C ^a,c   Walpole, Sharon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c 212 Ruffner Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846614574     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.42.1.6     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. ADAMS, M.J. (2006). The promise of automatic speech recognition for fostering literacy growth in children and adults. In M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, R. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 109-128). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. ANDERSON-INMAN, L., & HORNEY, M.A. (1998). Transforming text for at-risk readers. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world(pp. 15-43). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. BALAJTHY, E. (2005). Text-to-speech software for helping struggling readers. Reading Online. Retrieved May 20, 2006, from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/balajthy2/ index.html
4. BALAJTHY. E., REUBER, K., & ROBINSON, C. (2001). Teachers' use of technology in a reading clinic. Reading Online. Retrieved May 20, 2006, from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/ balajthy/index.html
5. BECK, J. (2002). Emerging literacy through assistive technology. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 44-48.
6. BRUCE, B.C., & HOGAN, M.P. (1998). The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 269-281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. DALTON, B., & STRANGMAN, N. (2006). Improving struggling readers' comprehension through scaffolded hypertexts and other computer-based literacy programs. In M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, R. Kieffer, &c D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 75-92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. DUKE, N.K., SCHMAR-DOBLER, E., & ZHANG, S. (2006). Comprehension and technology. In M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, R. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 317-326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. EDYBURN, D. (2002). Measuring assistive technology outcomes: Key concepts. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 53-55.
10. EDYBURN, D. (2003). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in writing. Journal of Special Education Technology, 18, 60-64.
11. EDYBURN, D. (2004). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in reading. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19, 60-64.
12. ERVIN, R.A., RADFORD, P.M., BERTSCH, K., PIPER, A.L., EHRHARDT, K.E., & POLING, A. (2001). A descriptive analysis and critique of the empirical literature on school-based functional assessment. School Psychology Bulletin, 30, 193-210.
13. FUCHS, D., & FUCHS, L.S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
14. GERSTEN, R., & DIMINO, J.A. (2006). RTI (Response to Intervention): Rethinking special education for students with reading difficulties (yet again). Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 99-108.
15. GOUGH, P.B., & TUNMER, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
16. HECKER, L., BURNS, L., ELKIND, J., ELKIND, K., & KATZ, L. (2002). Benefits of assistive reading software for students with attention deficit disorders. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 243-272.
17. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, Pub. L. 108-446 (2004). Retrieved May 20, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/speced/guia/idea/idea2004.html
18. JONES, K.M., & WICKSTROM, K.F. (2002). Done in sixty seconds: Further analysis of the brief assessment model for academic problems. School Psychology Review, 31, 554-568.
19. KLINGNER, J.K., & EDWARDS, P.A. (2006). Cultural considerations with Response to Intervention models. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 108-117.
20. LEONG, C.K. (1995). Effects of on-line reading and simultaneous DECtalk auding in helping below-average and poor readers comprehend and summarize text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 101-116.
21. MACARTHUR, C.A. (2005). The effects of new technologies on writing and writing processes. In C.A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 248-262). New York: Guilford.
22. MACARTHUR, C.A., FERRETTI, R.P., OKOLO, C.M., & CAVALIER, A.R. (2001). Technology applications for students with literacy problems: A critical review. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 275-301.
23. MCENEANEY, J.E., LOSE, M.K., & SCHWARTZ, R.M. (2006). A transactional perspective on reading difficulties and Response to Intervention. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 117-128.
24. MCKENNA, M.C. (1998). Electronic texts and the transformation of beginning reading. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 45-59). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. MCKENNA, M.C., REINKING, D., & BRADLEY, B.A. (2003). The effects of electronic trade books on the decoding growth of beginning readers. In R.M. Joshi, C.K. Leong, & B.L.J. Kaczmarek (Eds.), Literacy acquisition: The role of phonology, morphology, and orthography (pp. 193-202). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
26. MCKENNA, M.C., REINKING, D., & LABBO, L.D. (1999). The role of technology in the reading clinic: Its past and potential. In D.H. Evensen & P.B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Reconsidering the role of the readingclinic in a new age of literacy (Vol. 6 of Advances in Reading/Language Arts, pp. 347-364). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
27. MCKENNA, M.C., & STAHL, S.A. (2004). Assessment for reading instruction. New York: Guilford.
28. RAPP, W.H. (2005). Using assistive technology with students with exceptional learning needs: When does an aid become a crutch? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 193-196.
29. ROSE, D.H., HASSELBRING, T.S., STAHL, S., & ZABALA, J. (2005). Assistive technology and universal design for learning: Two sides of the same coin. In D. Edyburn, K. Higgins, & R. Boone (Eds.), Handbook of special education technology research and practice (pp. 507-518). Whitefish Bay, WI: Knowledge by Design.
30. SALOMON, G., & PERKINS, D.N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113-142.
31. SALOMON, G., PERKINS, D.N., & GLOBERSON, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 2-9.
32. SMITH, R.O. (2000). Measuring assistive technology outcomes in education. Diagnostique, 25, 273-290.
33. STAHL, S.A., KUHN, M.R., & PICKLE, J.M. (1999). An educational model of assessment and targeted instruction for children with reading problems. In D.H. Evensen & P.B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Reconsidering the role of the reading clinic in a new age of literacy (Vol. 6 of Advances in Reading/Language Arts, pp. 249-272). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
34. STANOVICH, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71.
35. STANOVICH, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
36. VINSONHALER, J.F., WEINSHANK, A.B., WAGNER, C.C., & POLIN, R.M. (1983). Diagnosing children with educational problems: Characteristics of reading and learning disabilities specialists, and classroom teachers. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 134-164.
37. WALPOLE, S., & MCKENNA, M.C. (2007). Differentiated reading instruction for small groups: Research-based strategies for grades K-3. New York: Guilford.
38. WATTS, E.H., O'BRIAN, M., & WOJCIK, B.W. (2004). Four models of assistive technology consideration: How do they compare to recommended educational assessment practices? Journal of Special Education Technology, 19, 43-56.
39. WISE, B.W., & OLSON, R.K. (1994). Computer speech and the remediation of reading and spelling problems. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 207-220