"I'll speak in proper slang": Language ideologies in a daily editing activity

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 100-131

  Godley, Amanda J ^a   Carpenter, Brian D ^a   Werner, Cynthia A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b 5111 Wesley W Posvar Hall ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846601833     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/RRQ.42.1.4     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. ALIM, H.S. (2005). Critical language awareness in the United States: Revisiting issues and revising pedagogies in a resegregated society. Educational Researcher, 34(7), 24-31.
2. ALVERMANN, D.E., YOUNG, J.P., GREEN, C., & WISENBAKER, J.M. (1999). Adolescents' perceptions and negotiations of literacy practices in after-school read and talk clubs. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 221-264.
3. ANDREWS, R., TORGERSON, C., BEVERTON, S., LOCKE, T., LOW, G., ROBINSON, A., ET AL. (2004). The effect of grammar teaching (syntax) in English on 5 to 16 year olds' accuracy and quality in written composition. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
4. ATWELL, N. (1998). In the middle: New understanding about writing, reading, and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
5. BAKHTIN, M.M. (2004). Dialogic origin and dialogic pedagogy of grammar: Stylistics in teaching Russian language in secondary school. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(6), 12-49.
6. BALL, A. (1995). Text design patterns in the writing of urban African American students: Teaching to the cultural strengths of students in multicultural settings. Urban Education, 30, 253-289.
7. BALL, A., WILLIAMS, J., & COOKS, J. (1997). An Ebonics-based curriculum: The educational value. The NEA Higher Education Journal, 13, 39-50.
8. BANNAN-RITLAND, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21-24.
9. BAUGH, J. (1995). The law, linguistics, and education: Educational reform for African American language minority students. Linguistics and Education, 7, 87-105.
10. BEASON, L. (2001). Ethos and error: How business people react to errors. College Composition and Communication, 53, 33-64.
11. BLOOME, D. (1994). Response to McCarthey: On the nature of language in classroom literacy research. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 232-240.
12. BLOOME, D., CARTER, S., CHRISTIAN, B., OTTO, S., & SHUART-FARIS, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. BLOOME, D., KATZ, L., & CHAMPION, T. (2003). Young children's narratives and ideologies of language in classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 205-223.
14. BRADDOCK, R., LLOYD-JONES, R., & SCHOER, L. (1963). Research in written composition. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
15. BROUGHTON, M.A., & FAIRBANKS, C.M. (2002). Stances and dances: The negotiation of subjectivities in a reading/language arts classroom. Language Arts, 79, 288-296.
16. BURBULES, N. (2000). The limits of dialogue as a critical pedagogy. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), Revolutionary pedagogies: Cultural politics, education, and the discourse of theory (pp. 251-273). New York: Routledge.
17. COBB, P., CONFREY, J., DISESSA, A., LEHRER. R., & SCHAUBLE, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
18. COLLEGE BOARD. (2006). The writing portion of the Scholastic Aptitude Test. Retrieved August 10, 2006, from http://www.college-board.com/student/ testing/sat/about/sat/writing.html
19. COPE, B., & KALANTZIS, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
20. CROSS, J.B., DEVANEY, T., & JONES, G. (2001). Pre-service teachet attitudes towards differing dialects. Linguistics and Education, 12, 211-227.
21. DAILY ORAL LANGUAGE: GRADES 1-12. (2006). Wilmington, MA: Great Source Education Group. Retrieved April 24, 2006, from
22. DELPIT, L.D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 280-298.
23. DELPIT, L.D. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: New Press.
24. DELPIT, L., & DOWDY, J.K. (Eds.). (2002). The skin that we speak: Thoughts on language and culture in the classroom. New York: New Press.
25. DUFF, P.A. (2002). The discursive co-construction of knowledge, identity, and difference: An ethnography ot communication in the high school mainstream. Applied Linguistics, 23, 289-322.
26. DYSON, A.H. (2004). Diversity as a "handful": Toward retheorizing the basics. Research in the Teaching of English, 39, 210-214.
27. EAGLETON, T. (1991). Ideology: An introduction. London: Verso.
28. ELEMENTS OF LITERATURE. (2005). Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
29. ELEMENTS OF LITERATURE: DAILY ORAL GRAMMAR TRANSPARENCIES AND WORKSHEETS. (2005). Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Retrieved April 24, 2006, from http://go.hrw. com/resources/go_mk/la/laeol1-7/dogramma.pdf
30. ELLEY, W.B., BARHAM, I.H., LAMB, H., &WYLLIE, M. (1979). The role of grammar in a secondary school curriculum. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
31. EMERSON, R.M., FRETZ, R.I., & SHAW, L.L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. FAIRCLOUGH, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
33. FAIRCLOUGH, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
34. FISH, S. (2005, May 31). Devoid of content. The New York Times Online. Rettieved May 31, 2005, from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/ 05/31/opinion/31fishhtml
35. GAL, S. (1989). Language and political economy. Annual Review of Anthropology, 18, 345-367.
36. GAL, S. (1998). Multiplicity and contention among language ideologies. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies (pp. 317-331). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37. GEE, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor & Francis.
38. GEE, J.P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.
39. GEE, J.P., & GREEN, J.L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119-169.
40. GODLEY, A. (2004). Applying Bakhtin's "Dialogic Origin and Dialogic Pedagogy of Grammar" to current research on literacy and grammar instruction. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(6), 54-59.
41. GODLEY, A.J. (2005, October 3). How widespread is Daily Oral Language? Message posted to Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar, archived at http://listserv.muohio.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A0=ATEG
42. GUTIERREZ, K.D. (1994). How talk, context, and script shape contexts for learning: A cross-case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education, 5, 335-365.
43. HAIRSTON, M. (1981). Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions respond to lapses in usage. College English 43, 794-806.
44. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (2002). On grammar. London: Continuum.
45. HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (2003). On language and linguistics. London: Continuum.
46. HAUSSAMEN, B., BENJAMIN, A., KOLLN, M., & WHEELER, R. (2003). Grammar alive! A guide for teachers. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
47. HILLOCKS, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English/ERIC.
48. HUCKIN, T.N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. The Journal of TESOL France, 2(2), 95-111.
49. INTERNATIONAL READING ASSOCIATION & NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF ENGLISH. (1996). Standards for the English language arts. Newark, DE; Urbana, IL: Authors.
50. JORDAN, J. (1988). Nobody mean more to me than you and the future life of Willie Jordan. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 363-376.
51. KOLLN, M. (1981). Closing the books on alchemy. College Composition and Communication, 32, 139-151.
52. KRAUTHAMER, H.S. (1999). Spoken language interference patterns (SLIPs) in written English. New York: Peter Lang.
53. LADSON-BILLINGS, G. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching, Theory Into Practice, 31, 312-320.
54. LANEHART, S.L. (2002). Sista, speak!: Black women kinfolk talk about language and literacy. Austin: University of Texas Press.
55. THE LANGUAGE OF LITERATURE. (2006). Boston: McDougal, Littell.
56. LEE, C.D. (2000). Signifying in the Zone of Proximal Development. In C.D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literary research (pp. 191-225). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
57. LEE, H. (1960). To kill a mockingbird. New York: Warner.
58. LU, M.Z. (2004). An essay on the work of composition: Composing English against the order of fast capitalism. College Composition and Communication, 56, 16-50.
59. LUKE, A. (2004). The trouble with English. Research in the Teaching of English, 39, 85-95.
60. MEHAN, H. (1982). The structure of classroom events and their consequences for student performance. In P. Gilmore & A.A. Glatthorn (Eds.), Children in andout of school (pp. 59-87). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
61. MILROY, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5/4, 530-555.
62. MINCHEW, S.S., & MCGRATH, V.R. (2001). Lasting benefits of cooperative editing for remedial freshmen composition students: A follow-up study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 25, 591-606.
63. MOLL, L. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132-141.
64. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF ENGLISH. (1995). SLATE starter sheet #3: On the teaching of grammar. Urbana, IL: Author.
65. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF ENGLISH. (2004). 2005 NCTE Annual Convention call for proposals. Urbana, IL: Author.
66. NATIONAL STUDY GROUP FOR THE AFFIRMATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF ACADEMIC ABILITY. (2004). All students reaching the top: Strategies for closing academic achievement gaps. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
67. NEW LONDON GROUP. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
68. NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT OF 2001, Pub. L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. (2002). Retrieved August 4, 2006, from http://www.ed. gov/policy/elsec/leg/ esea02/index.html
69. NOGUCHI, R.R. (1991). Grammar and the teaching of writing: Limits and possibilities. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
70. NYSTRAND, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
71. OGBU, J. (1999). Beyond language: Ebonics, proper English, and identity in a Black-American speech community. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 147-184.
72. OXFORD DICTIONARY OF LINGUISTICS (1997). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
73. POMERANTZ, A. (2002). Language ideologies and the production of identities: Spanish as a resource for participation in a multilingual marketplace. Multilingua, 21, 275-302.
74. RICKFORD, J.R. (1999). African American Vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
75. ROGERS, R., MALANCHARUVIL-BERKES, E., MOSLEY, M., HUI, D., & JOSEPH, G.O. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 365-416.
76. SAVILLE-TROIKE, M. (1989). The ethnography of communication: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Basil Blackwell.
77. SCHLEPPEGRELL, M. (2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12, 431-459.
78. SCHLEPPEGRELL, M., ACHUGAR, M., & OTEÍZA T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 67-93.
79. SCHWORM, P. (2005, April 3). War of the words: In class, grammar rears its ugly head. The Boston Globe. Retrieved April, 5, 2005, from http://boston.com
80. SILVERSTEIN, M. (1998). Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 27, 401-426.
81. SMITHERMAN, G. (1977). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
82. SPEICHER, B.L., & BIELANSKI, J.R. (2000). Critical thoughts on teaching Standard English. Curriculum Inquiry, 30, 147-169.
83. STRASSER, T. (1981). The Wave. New York: Dell Laurel-Leaf.
84. STREET, B.V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
85. SWEETLAND, J. (2002). Unexpected but authentic use of an ethnically-marked dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 514-536.
86. TIMELESS VOICES, TIMELESS, THEMES: TEACHING RESOURCES: DAILY LANGUAGE PRACTICE (GOLD LEVEL). (1999). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
87. TIMELESS VOICES, TIMELESS THEMES. (2003). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
88. WASSINK, A.B., & CURZAN, A. (2004). Addressing ideologies around African American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 32, 171-185.
89. WEAVER, C. (1996). Teaching grammar in context. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
90. WELLS, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-38.
91. WHEELER, R.S., & SWORDS, R. (2004). Codeswitching: Tools of language and culture transform the dialectally diverse classroom. Language Arts, 81, 470-480.
92. WHITTINGHAM, J.L. (2003). The effectiveness of Daily Oral Language at the elementary level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
93. WOLFRAM, W., ADGER, C.T., & CHRISTIAN, D. (1999). Dialects in schools and communities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. WOOLARD, K.A., & SCHIEFFELIN, B.B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55-82.
95. WORTHAM, S. (2001). Language ideology and educational research. Linguistics and Education, 12, 253-259.
96. WRITER'S CHOICE. (2005). Columbus, OH: McGraw Hill/Glencoe.
97. YOUNG, J.P. (2000). Boy talk: Critical literacy and masculinities. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 312-337.
98. ZERNIKE, K. (2004, November 7). Modifying the subject. The New York Times Online. Retrieved November 7, 2004, from http://www. nytimes.com/2004/11/ 07