Two galactosyltransferases' selection of different binders from the same uridine-based dynamic combinatorial library

Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-4

  Valade, Anne ^a   Urban, Dominique ^a   Beau, Jean Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GALACTOSYLTRANSFERASE; URIDINE DIPHOSPHATE GALACTOSE;

ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN BINDING;

CARBOHYDRATE SEQUENCE; COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; GALACTOSYLTRANSFERASES; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; URIDINE DIPHOSPHATE GALACTOSE;

EID: 33846576895     PISSN: 15204766     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/cc060033w     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lehn, J.-M. Chem. - Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2455.
2. Huc, I.; Nguyen, R. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2001, 4, 109.
3. Rowan, S. J.; Cantrill, S. J.; Cousins, G. R. L.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Stoddart, J. F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898.
4. Cheeseman, J. D.; Corbett, A. D.; Gleason, J. L.; Kazlauskas, R. J. Chem. - Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1708.
5. (a) Huc, I.; Lehn, J.-M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 2106.
6. (b) Bunyapaiboonsri, T.; Ramström, O.; Lohman, S.; Lehn, J.-M.; Peng, L.; Goeldner, M. ChemBioChem 2001, 2, 438.
7. (c) Hochgürtel, M.; Kroth, H.; Piecha, D.; Hofmann, M. W.; Nicolau, C.; Krause, S.; Schaaf, O.; Sonnenmoser, G.; Eliseev, A. V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 3382.
8. (d) Hochgürtel, M.; Biesinger, R.; Kroth, H.; Piecha, D.; Hofmann, M. W.; Krause, S.; Schaaf, O.; Nicolau, C.; Eliseev, A. V. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 356.
9. (e) Bunyapaiboonsri, T.; Ramström, H.; Ramström, O.; Haiech, J.; Lehn, J.-M. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 5803.
10. (f) Congreve, M. S.; Davis, D. J.; Devine, L.; Granata, C.; O'Reilly, M.; Wyatt, P. G.; Jhoti, H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4479.
11. (g) Corbett, A. D.; Cheeseman, J. D.; Kazlauskas, R. J.; Gleason, J. L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2432.
12. (h) Shi, B.; Stevenson R.; Campopiano D. J.; Greaney M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8459.
13. Zameo, S.; Vauzeilles, B.; Beau, J.-M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 965.
14. (a) Qian, X.; Palcic, M. M. In Carbohydrates in Chemistry and Biology; Ernst, B., Hart, G. W., Sinay, P., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000, Vol. 3, pp 293-312.
15. (b) Compain, P.; Martin, O. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 3077.
16. (c) Takayama, S.; Chung, S. J.; Igarashi, Y.; Ichikawa, Y.; Sepp, A.; Lechler, R. I.; Wu, J.; Hayashi, T.; Siuzdak, G.; Wong, C.-H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 401.
17. (d) Kim, Y. J.; Ichikawa, M.; Ichikawa, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5829.
18. For the 3D structure of the β1,4GalT, see: Gastinel, L. N.; Cambillau, C.; Bourne, Y. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 3546.
19. In the course of these studies, information was also provided on the 3D structure of the α1,3GalT, substrates' binding and catalytic mechanism. See: Boix, E.; Zhang, Y.; Swaminathan, G. J.; Brew, K.; Acharya, K. R. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 28310.
20. Sinnott, M. L. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90, 1171.
21. Vaghefi, M. M.; Bernacki, R. J.; Dalley, N. K.; Wilson, B. E.; Robins, R. K. J. Med. Chem. 1987, 30, 1383.
22. (b) Murata, S.; Ichikawa, S.; Matsuda, A. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 5837 and references therein.
23. Ballell, L.; Young, R. J.; Field, R. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1109.
24. For a recent disclosure of a static uridine-based library targeting the N-acetyl-α-galactosaminyltransferases, see: Hang, H. C.; Yu, C.; Ten Hagen, K. G.; Tian, E.; Winans, K. A.; Tabak, L. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 337.
25. Biet, T.; Peters, T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4189.
26. Jones, G. H.; Taniguchi, M.; Tegg, D.; Moffatt, J. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 1309.
27. Lee, R. T.; Lee, Y. C. Carbohydr. Res. 1974, 37, 193.
28. Newcomb, M.; Timko, J. M.; Walba, D. M.; Cram, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 6392.
29. Scheytza, H.; Rademacher, O.; Reissig, H.-U. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2373.
30. Wang, Z.; Reibenspies, J.; Motekaitis, R. J.; Martell, A. E. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1995, 1511.
31. We have previously checked that each enzyme was still active after 9 or 13 days only under these buffer conditions, and for the study with the DCL members, we have kept those conditions (buffer, pH) that are optimal for the activity of each enzyme.
32. Unfortunately, all attempts to identify all the members of the library by LC/MS or LC/evaporative light scattering methods failed. For monitoring a glycopeptide DCL by ESI-MS, see: Hotchkiss, T.; Kramer, H. B.; Doores, K. J.; Gamblin, D. P.; Oldham, N. J.; Davis, B. G. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4264.
33. Although the α1,3GalT was able to induce amplifications with an unusually small concentration (1.6 μM), 10 times more of the β1,4GalT (16 μM) was needed to detect amplifications.
34. 2 (20 mM) without the enzyme. The resulting mixtures (100 μL) were equilibrated at ambient temperature for 9 days. Aliquots (20 μL) were removed and diluted with acetic acid (10 μL).