Shared cognition as a product of, and precursor to, shared identity in negotiations

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 187-199

  Swaab, Roderick ^a,e   Postmes, Tom ^b   Van Beest, Ilja ^c   Spears, Russell ^d  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Multiparty negotiation; Shared cognition; Social dilemmas; Social identity

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; CODEPENDENCY (PSYCHOLOGY); COGNITION; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEGOTIATING; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 33846516792     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167206294788     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (1999). Negotiation processes and outcomes in prosocially and egoistically motivated groups. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 385-402.
2. Beersma, B., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Integrative and distributive negotiation in small groups: Effects of task structure, decision rule, and social motive. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 227-252.
3. Bouas, K. S., & Komorita, S. S. (1996). Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1144-1150.
4. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 221-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Caporeal, L., Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., & Van der Kragt, A. (1989). Selfishness examined: Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Behavioral and Brain Science, 12, 683-699.
6. Carnevale, P., & Isen, A. M. (1986). The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 1-13.
7. Carnevale, P. J. D., Pruitt, D. G., & Seilheimer, S. (1981). Looking and competing: Accountability and visual access in integrative bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 111-120.
8. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
9. Dawes, R. M., Van der Kragt, A. J., & Orbell, J. M. (1988). Not me or thee but we: The importance of group identity in eliciting cooperation in dilemma situations: Experimental manipulations. Acta Psychologica, 68, 83-97.
10. Dawes, R. M., Van der Kragt, A. J., & Orbell, J. M. (1990). Cooperation for the benefit of us - not me, or my conscience. In J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Carnevale, P. (2003). Motivational bases for information processing and strategy in negotiation and conflict. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35). New York: Academic Press.
12. De Dreu, C. K. W., Weingart, L. R., & Kwon, S. (2000). Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A meta-analytic review and test of two theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 889-905.
13. Ellemers, N., & Rink, F. (in press). Identity in work groups: The beneficial and detrimental consequences of multiple identities and group norms for collaboration and group performance. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 22). New York: Elsevier Science.
14. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage Ltd.
15. Hinsz, V. B. (1995). Mental models of groups as social system: Considerations of specification and assessment. Small Group Research, 26, 200-233.
16. Hogg, M. A. (1996). Intragroup processes, group structure and social identity. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 65-94). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heineman.
17. Hollingshead, A. (1998a). Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 423-442.
18. Hollingshead, A. (1998b). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
19. Hollingshead, A. (2001). Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1080-1089.
20. Hollingshead, A. B., & Brandon, D. P. (2003). Potential benefits of communication in transactive memory systems. Human Communication Research, 29, 607-615.
21. Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Kerr, N. L., & Kaufman-Gililand, C. M. (1994). Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 513-529.
23. Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
24. Kramer, R. M., Pommerenke, P., & Newton, E. (1993). The social context of negotiation: Effects of social identity and interpersonal accountability on negotiator decision making. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37, 633-654.
25. LeBon, G. (1895). The crowd: A study of the popular mind. London: Ernest Benn.
26. Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating factor of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.
27. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Littlepage, G., Robinson, W., & Reddington, K. (1997). Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 133-147.
29. Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C. S., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3-13.
30. Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 971-986.
31. McDougall, W. (1921). The group mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Hutchinson, K. J., & Grace, D. M. (1995). Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 237-256.
33. Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. Thompson, J. Levine, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 57-84). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 117-133.
36. Morris, M., Nadler, J., Kurtzberg, T., & Thompson, L. (2002). Schmooze or lose: Social friction and lubrication in e-mail negotiations. Group Dynamics, 6, 89-100.
37. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Murnighan, K., Babcock, L., Thompson, L., & Pillutla, M. (1999). The information dilemma in negotiations: Effects of experience, incentives, and integrative potential. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 313-339.
39. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
40. Ouwerkerk, J., de Gilder, D., & de Vries, N. K. (2000). When the going gets tough, the tough get going: Social identification and individual effort in intergroup competition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1550-1559.
41. Pinkley, R. L. (1995). "Fixed pie" al la mode: Information availability, information processing, and the negotiation of suboptimal agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 101-112.
42. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 1-42.
43. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
44. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1999). Social identity, normative content, and "deindividuation" in computer-mediated groups. In N. Ellemers & R. Spears (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 164-183). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
45. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, T., & Novak, R. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763.
46. Pruitt, D. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
47. Raudenbusch, S., Bryk, A., & Congdon. (2001). Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling (Version 5.05) [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
48. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Ltd.
49. Swaab, R. I., Postmes, T., Neijens, P., Kiers, M. H., & Dumay, A. C. M. (2002). Multi-party negotiation support: The role of visualization's influence on the development of shared mental models. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19.
50. Swaab, R. I., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2004). Attraction, identification and motivation in small group negotiations. Paper presented at the International Association for Conflict Management, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
51. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. New York Academic Press, 15.
52. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
53. Thompson, L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 27, 161-179.
54. Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 3, 278-302.
55. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
56. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
57. Valley, K. L., Thompson, L., Gibbons, R., & Bazerman, M. H. (2002). How communication improves efficiency in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 38, 127-155.
58. Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2005). Do-no-harm in coalition formation: Why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 609-617.
59. Van Beest, I., Van Dijk, E., & Wilke, H. (2003). The excluded player in coalition formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 237-247.
60. Van Boven, L., & Thompson, L. (2003). A look into the mind of the negotiator: Mental models in negotiation. Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations, 6, 387-404.
61. Van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Social identity and group performance: Identification as the key to group-oriented efforts. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 29-42). New York: Psychology Press.
62. Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-208). New York: Springer.
63. Worchel, S., Rothberger, H., Day, A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and individual productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389-413.