The ideal of facial beauty: A review;Das faziale Schönheitsideal: Ein Literaturüberblick

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 6-16

  Hönn, Mirjam ^a   Göz, Gernot ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Averageness; Distinguishing features; Ideal of facial beauty; Symmetry

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; CEPHALOMETRY; ESTHETICS; FACE; GENDER; HUMAN; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STANDARD;

ANTHROPOMETRY; BEAUTY; BEAUTY CULTURE; BIOMETRY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 33846496697     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-007-0604-6     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Van 't Hof MA. Assessment of dental and facial aesthetics in adolescents. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:399-405.
2. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972;62:296-309.
3. Auger TA, Turley PK. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: A photographic analysis. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1999;14:7-18.
4. Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980;8:244-56.
5. Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol [Amst] 2004;117:313-32.
6. Berg R. Orthodontic treatment - yes or no? A difficult decision in some cases. A contribution to the discussion. J Orofac Orthop 2001;62:410-21.
7. Bernstein IH, Lin TD, McClellan P. Cross- vs. within-racial judgments of attractiveness. Percept Psychophys 1982;32:495-503.
8. Berscheid E. An overview of the psychological effects of physical attractiveness. In Lucker G, RKMJ, ed. Psychological aspects of facial form. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1980:1-25.
9. Björk A. The face in profile. Swed Dent J 1947;5:40-4.
10. Broadbent BH. A new X-ray technique and its application to orthodontia. Angle Orthod 1931;1:45-53.
11. Broadbent BH. Bolton standards and technique in orthodontic practice. Angle Orthod 1937;7:209-12.
12. Broadbent BH. The face of the normal child. Angle Orthod 1937;7:183-9.
13. Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. J Endocrinol Invest 2003;26:45-8.
14. Choe KS, Sclafani AP, Litner JA, et al. The Korean American woman's face: Anthropometric measurements and quantitative analysis of facial aesthetics. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:244-52.
15. Cunningham MR, Barbee AP, Pike CL. What do women want? Facial metric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990;59:61-72.
16. Downs WB. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis. Am J Orthod 1952;38:162-9.
17. Downs WB. Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 1956;26:191-5.
18. Edler RJ. Background considerations to facial aesthetics. J Orthod 2001;28:159-68.
19. Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987;9:314-8.
20. Farkas LG. Accuracy of anthropometric measurements: Past, present, and future. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1996;33:10-8.
21. Faure JC, Rieffe C, Maltha JC. The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:1-7.
22. Grammer K, Thornhill R. Human [Homo sapiens] facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol 1994; 108:233-42.
23. Hönn M, Dietz K, Godt A, et al. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66:187-96.
24. Iwawaki S, Eysenck HJ, Gotz KO. A new Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test [VAST]: II. cross-cultural comparison between England and Japan. Percept Mot Skills 1979;49:859-62.
25. Jarabak JR, Fizzel JA. Technique and treatment with light-wire edgewise appliances. 2nd ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1972:29-94.
26. Jefferson Y. Skeletal types: Key to unraveling the mystery of facial beauty and its biologic significance. J Gen Orthod 1996;7:7-25.
27. Johnston VS FM. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethol Sociobiol 1993;14:183-99.
28. Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, et al. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:505-12.
29. Kerr WJ, O'Donnell JM. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990;17:299-304.
30. Landes CA, Bitsakis J, Diehl T, et al. Introduction of a three-dimensional anthropometry of the viscerocranium. Part I: measurement of craniofacial development and establishment of standard values and growth functions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002;30:18-24.
31. Langlois JH, Roggman LA, Musselman L. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychol Sci 1994;5:214-20.
32. Langlois JH, Roggman LA, Casey RJ, et al. Infant preferences for attractive faces: Rudiments of stereotype? Dev Psychol 1987;23:363-9.
33. Lew KK. Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:31-5.
34. Mealey L, Bridgstock R, Townsend GC. Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: A monozygotic co-twin comparison. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999;76:151-8.
35. Michiels G, Sather AH. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1994;9:43-54.
36. Mueser KT, Grau BW, Sussman S, et al. You are only as pretty as you feel: Facial expression as a determinant of physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984;46:469-78.
37. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1995;1:67-81.
38. Peerlings RH, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Hoeksma JB. A photographic scale to measure facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:101-9.
39. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Castles DL, et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 1999;399:741-2.
40. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 1998;394:884-7.
41. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 1994;368:239-42.
42. Phillips C, Tulloch C, Dann C. Rating of facial attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;20:214-20.
43. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:963-9.
44. Porter JP. The average African American male face: An anthropometric analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:78-81.
45. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis: C.V. Mosby, 2000.
46. only because of their symmetry? Psychol Sc 1999;10:52-8.
47. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric synthesis. Am J Orthod 1960;46: 647-63.
48. Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 1968;54:272-89.
49. Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982;81:351-70.
50. Sarver DM. The face as the determinant of the treatment choice. In McNamara JA,KK, ed. Frontiers of dental and facial esthetics Michigan: An Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan, 2001:19-54.
51. Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc Biol Sci 1999;266:1913-7.
52. Schlosser JB, Preston CB, Lampasso J. The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:17-24.
53. Sergl HG, Lautenbach B. Über den Wert ästhetischer Normen im Rahmen der Profilbeurteilung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1984;45:87-100.
54. Sergl HG, Zentner A, Krause G. An experimental study of the esthetic effect of facial profiles. J Orofac Orthop 1998;59:116-26.
55. Shackelford TK, Larsen RJ. Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. J Pers Soc Psychol 1997;72:456-66.
56. Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119: 464-71.
57. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in for you and me. Am J Orthod 1953;39:729-33.
58. Stenvik A, Espeland L, Linge BO, et al. Lay attitudes to dental appearance and need for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:271-7.
59. Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proc Biol Sci 1995;261: 111-6.
60. Symons D. The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.
61. Tatarunaite E, Playle R, Hood K, et al. Facial attractiveness: A longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:676-82.
62. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci 1999;3:452-60.
63. Treu G. Durchschnittsbild und Schönheit [composite pictures and beauty]. Zeitschrift für Aesthetik und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 1914;9:433-48.
64. Tulloch C, Phillips C, Dann C. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1993;8:171-9.
65. Udry J. Structural correlates of feminine beauty preferences in Britain and the U.S.: A comparison. Sociol Soc Res 1965;49:330-42.
66. Ward RE, Jamison PL. Measurement precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: Implications and suggestions for clinical applications. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1991;11:156-64.
67. Zaidel DW, Aarde SM, Baig K. Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces. Brain Cogn 2005; 57:261-3.