The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-7

  Faure, Julie C ^a   Rieffe, Carolien ^b   Maltha, Jaap C ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; DENTAL CARE; EYE; FACE; FACE ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; FOREHEAD; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; EYE; FACE; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; FOREHEAD; HUMANS; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; PILOT PROJECTS; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY;

EID: 0036482265     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/24.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baldwin B C 1980 Appearance and esthetics in oral health. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 8: 244-256
2. Berscheid E 1980 An overview of the psychological effects of physical attractiveness. In: Lucker G, Ribbens K, McNamara J A (eds) Psychological aspects of facial form. University of Michigan Press, Michigan, pp. 1-25
3. Berscheid E, Walster E 1974 Physical attractiveness. In: Berkowitz S (ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology, Volume 6. Academic Press, New York
4. Bull R, Rumsey N 1998 The social psychology of facial appearance. Springer Verlag, New York
5. Cox N H, van der Linden FPGM 1971 Facial harmony. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 175-183
6. Cunningham M R 1986 Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 925-935
7. Cunningham M R, Barbee A P, Pike C L 1990 What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 61-72
8. Dion K K, Berscheid E, Walster E 1972 What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 24: 285-290
9. Evans R, Shaw W 1987 Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. European Journal of Orthodontics 9: 314-318
10. Feingold A 1990 Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: a comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 981-993
11. Feinman S, Gill G W 1977 Sex differences in physical attractiveness preferences. Journal of Social Psychology 105: 43-52
12. Franzoi S L, Herzog M E 1987 Judging physical attractiveness: what body aspects do we use? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13: 19-33
13. Gangestad S W, Thornhill R, Yeo R A 1994 Facial attractiveness, developmental stability and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology 15: 73-85
14. Grammer K, Thornhill R 1994 Human facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology 108: 233-242
15. Howells D J, Shaw W C 1985 The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attractiveness for the epidemiologic use. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 402-408
16. Johnston V S, Franklin M 1993 Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology 14: 183-199
17. Keating C F 1985 Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Social Psychology Quarterly 48: 61-70
18. Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw W 1995 The influence of incisor malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. European Journal of Orthodontics 17: 505-512
19. Kowner R 1996 Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgement in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22: 662-765
20. Langlois J H, Roggman L A 1990 Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science 1: 115-121
21. Langlois J H, Roggman L A, Musselman L 1994 What is average and what is not average about attractive faces. Psychological Science 5: 214-220
22. Lew K K 1993 Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 21: 31-35
23. Lundström A, Woodside D G, Popovich F 1987 Panel assessment of facial profile related to mandibular growth direction. European Journal of Orthodontics 9: 271-278
24. Lundström A, Popovich F, Woodside G 1989 Panel assessment of the facial frontal view as related to mandibular growth direction. European Journal of Orthodontics 11: 290-297
25. Meerdink J, Garbin C P, Leger D W 1990 Cross-gender perceptions of facial attributes and their relation to attractiveness: do we see them differently than they see us? Perception and Psychophysics 448: 227-233
26. Peerlings R H J 1992 Orthodontie en dento-faciale esthetiek. PhD Thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
27. Peerlings R H J, Kuijpers-Jagtman A M, Hoeksma J B 1995 A photographic scale to measure facial aesthetics. European Journal of Orthodontics 17: 101-109
28. Perrett D I, May K A, Yoshikawa S 1994 Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368: 239-242
29. Riggio R E, Widaman K F, Tucker J S, Salinas C 1991 Beauty is more than skin deep: components of attractiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 12: 423-439
30. Shaw W C 1981 The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. American Journal of Orthodontics 79: 399-415
31. Shaw W C, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles C R 1985 The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. American Journal of Orthodontics 87: 21-26
32. Smit A de, Dermaut L 1984 Soft-tissue profile preference. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 67-73
33. Soh G, Lew K 1992 Assessment of orthodontic treatment needs by teenagers in an Asian community in Singapore. Community Dental Health 9: 57-62
34. Thornhill R, Gangestad S W 1993 Human facial beauty: averageness, symmetry and parasite resistance. Human Nature 4: 237-269